Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 24;11:206–217. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.09.022

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

(A) Workflow for evaluating rat skin wound healing and FBR; (B) Macroscopic images of rat skin defects and (C) corresponding analysis; (D) Residual gap images of H&E of rat skin defects and (E) corresponding analysis; (F) The analysis of keratinized layer images of H&E; (G) FBR images of MST Staining of rat subcutaneous implantations and (H) corresponding analysis; (I) Cell infiltration images of H&E of rat skin defects and (J) corresponding analysis. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 by ANOVA for data in (C), (E), (F), (H), and (J). Different letters indicate significant differences.