Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 11;21:482. doi: 10.1186/s12883-021-02505-0

Table 2.

Univariate and multivariable analysis of risk factors for poor functional outcomes after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage with intraventricular hemorrhage

Univariate analysis Multivariable analysis
Parameter Good outcome (n=38) Poor outcome (n=29) P-value OR (95% CI) P-value
Age (years) 55.9 ± 11.3 74.5 ± 8.9 <0.001 1.561 (1.126–2.162) 0.007
Female 33 (86.8) 22 (75.9) 0.200
Initial H-H grade <0.001 227.296 (1.715–30119.199) 0.030
1-3 33 (86.8) 6 (20.7)
4-5 5 (13.2) 23 (79.3)
SAH thickness 0.173
Thin (<1mm) 16 (42.1) 12 (41.4)
Thick (>1mm) 22 (57.9) 17 (58.6)
Location of aneurysm 0.200
Anterior circulation 33 (86.8) 22 (75.9)
Posterior circulation 5 (13.2) 7 (24.1)
DIND 3 (7.9) 3 (10.3) 0.526
Delayed infarction 2 (5.3) 7 (24.1) 0.030 5310.632 (3.209–8788298.374) 0.023
Shunt-dependent hydrocephalus 6 (15.8) 14 (48.3) 0.004 0.025 (0–4.957) 0.171
Initial mGS 10.6 ± 5.4 16.8 ± 5.7 <0.001 1.632 (1.015–2.622) 0.043
IVH CCR (%) 67.4 ± 29.1 28.3 ± 24.0 <0.001 0.941 (0.890–0.994) 0.029

Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation or number (%).

OR odds ratio; CI confidence interval; H-H Hunt & Hess; SAH subarachnoid hemorrhage; CHC chronic hydrocephalus; DIND delayed ischemic neurologic deficiet; mGS modified Graeb score; IVH intraventricular hemorrhage; CCR intraventricular clot clearance rate