Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 10;21:689. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02641-9

Table 3.

Benefits of Treatment; Results of Meta-Analysis by Outcome for Included Studies (n = 12)

Outcome # studies | N SMD (95% Confidence interval) GRADE rating
Falls (# events) 4 | 224 RR 0.99 (0.60, 1.65)

LOW

downgraded for risk of bias and imprecision

Falls (incidence) 4 | 209 IR 0.90 (0.47, 1.71)

LOW

downgraded for risk of bias and imprecision

Perceived Risk of Falls / Fear of Falling 8 | 263 Medium; −0.73 (−1.10, − 0.36)

MODERATE

downgraded for risk of bias

Balance 9 | 318 Medium; 0.66 (0.19, 1.12)

MODERATE

downgraded for risk of bias

Gait speed and control 6 | 194 Small; 0.26 (0.08, 0.43)

MODERATE

downgraded for risk of bias

TUG 5 | 151 Medium; −0.56 (−0.94, − 0.17)

MODERATE

downgraded for risk of bias

CST 2 | 70 No effect; 0.34 (−1.73, 1.06) VERY LOW downgraded for risk of bias and imprecision

Bold denotes significance p < 0.05; N = total number of participants; SMD standardized mean difference, RR risk ratio, IR incidence rate, TUG timed up and go test, CST chair sit and stand test