Table 1.
Main category | Subcategory | Description/notes/hypotheses |
---|---|---|
Bibliometric data | ||
Author | Last name, first name | |
Author affiliation | ||
Title | ||
Link/DOI | ||
Year of publication | ||
Year study conducted | (if available) | |
Time frame under study | Years of studies included | |
Country/ies of focus | ||
Setting definition |
HIC MIC LIC |
|
Study method classification |
Qualitative Mixed-methods Document analysis |
Primary vs secondary studies |
Study sample | ||
Objectives/purpose | Stated objectives of the study | |
Policy/reform of focus | ||
Data on stakeholder engagement at key stages of the research process | ||
Funding | Who commissioned and/or funded the PEA? | |
Design | Were stakeholders involved in the design of the study and definition of the research questions? If yes, who/which stakeholders? How were they involved? | |
Is the study a retrospective or prospective design? | ||
What is the envisaged “audience” of the research? | ||
Data collection | Were stakeholders involved in data collection? If yes, who/which stakeholders, and how were they were involved? | For example (who), were stakeholders from other sectors, or non-state stakeholders involved? For example (how), as key informants, or to provide key documentation, etc. |
Data analysis | Were stakeholders involved in data analysis? If yes, who/which stakeholders, and how were they were involved? | For example, brainstorming, feedback of preliminary data and/or “respondent validation” of results with key informants |
Communication/dissemination of findings | How were findings shared and with whom? | Hyp. is that often findings are not disseminated locally, as seen as sensitive |
Did the study include policy-related recommendations for local change? | Versus methodological reflections or recommendations for donors or external actors | |
Monitoring and evaluation of research uptake | Did the study track any uptake or impact of their work/findings? |