Table 4.
The fumigant antagonistic activity of LTM-m against Rhizoctonia solani
| Treatment | Inhibition rate (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| 1st exp. | 2nd exp. | 3rd exp. | Average | |
| LTM-m 2 g | 52 ± 3.5 aa | 20.7 ± 1.8 a | 29 ± 2.6 a | 33.9 ± 4.9 ab |
| LTM-m 5 g | 67 ± 3.5 a | 29.7 ± 3.8 a | 14.7 ± 14.7 a | 37.1 ± 9.0 a |
| LTM-m 10 g | 50 ± 14.0 a | 6.0 ± 4.2 b | 32 ± 16.0 a | 29.3 ± 8.9 a |
| CKc | 0 b | 0 b | 0 a | 0 b |
a
Means (n = 3) in the same column followed by the same letter are not significantly different (P = 0.05) according to least significant difference test (LSD). Values are presented as mean ± SE.
b
Means (n = 9) in the same column followed by the same letter are not significantly different (P = 0.05) according to LSD. Values are presented as mean ± SE.
c
CK: 10 g sterilized sandy soil with 70% (v/v) distilled water.