TABLE 2.
Classification of studies | ELF‐EMF treatment | Cell line | Agent co‐used (co‐stressor) | Interaction | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
ELF‐EMF exposure prior to co‐stressor | |||||
Kaszuba‐Zwoinska et al. 10 | Pulsed electromagnetic field | 50 Hz, 45 ± 5 mT, 4 h/stimulation, 3 times in 24 h | Monocytic cell line MonoMac6 | Minocycline puromycin, colchicine, cyclophosphamide, hydrogen peroxide | Diminished amount of apoptotic and necrotic cells; enhanced expression of gene belonging to pro‐apoptotic family of Bcl‐2 and AIF agent (antagonism) |
Harland et al. 210 | Environmental‐level magnetic fields |
60 Hz, 1.2 µT 6 days |
MCF‐7 |
Tamoxifen Melatonin |
Significantly block the growth inhibitory action (antagonism) |
Palumbo et al. 14 | ELF‐EMF | Intermittent 50 Hz, 1 mT; 1 h | Jurkat cells | Anti‐Fas | Significant decrease of anti‐Fas‐induced apoptosis (antagonism) |
Mansourian et al. 16 | Static (DC) magnetic fields | 93.25–159.4 µT; 10 min | Erythroleukaemia K562 | Electrochemotherapy | Can incur resistance of the cells in response to electric pulses (antagonist) |
Falone et al. 196 | ELF‐EMF |
75 Hz, 1 mT 5–10 days |
SH‐SY5Y human neuroblastoma |
H2O2 Doxorubicin |
Reduced vulnerability against both H2O2 and ROS‐generating doxorubicin (antagonism) |
De Nicola et al. 13 | ELF‐EMF | 100 mT,N/A; 4 h | U937 cells | Puromycin | Protect U937 from apoptosis (antagonist) |
Osera et al. 107 | Pulsed EMF |
75 Hz, 2 mT 40 min |
SH‐SY5Y cell line | H2O2 | Protected SH‐SY5Y cell line (antagonist) |
Falone et al. 193 | ELF‐EMF | 75 Hz, 2 mT | SK‐N‐BE(2) neuroblastoma | H2O2 | Reduced vulnerability against H2O2 (antagonist) |
Simultaneous exposure to ELF‐EMF and co‐stressor | |||||
Marcantonio et al. 211 | ELF‐EMF |
50 Hz, 1 mT 24–72 h |
Neuroblastoma BE(2)C | All trans retinoic acid (ATRA) | Decreased cellular proliferation and increased proportion of G0/G1 phase cells (potentiation) |
Kaszuba‐Zwoinska et al. 10 | Pulsed EMF |
50 Hz, 45 ± 5 mT 12 h |
Neuroblastoma (U937) |
Puromycin Cyclophosphamide H2O2 Colchicine |
PEMF protects U937 cells against puromycin‐induced cell death (antagonism) |
Baharara et al. 10 | ELF‐EMF |
50 Hz, 20 mT 2 h |
A2780 ovarian cancer cells | Cisplatin | Increased apoptotic as well as necrotic cells (potentiation) |
Ding et al. 8 | ELF‐EMF |
60 Hz, 5 mT 24 h |
Leukaemia HL‐60 | H2O2 | Changes generated by the ELF‐EMF can make resistant cells sensitive (potentiation) |
Liburdy et al. 191 | DC Fields | 12–50 Hz, 6.5 mT | MCF‐7 | Melatonin | Increased the number of apoptotic and necrotic cells (potentiation) |
Cid et al. 15 | ELF‐EMF |
50 Hz, 10 µT 90 h |
HepG2 | Melatonin | Enhancement of proliferation by blocking melatonin's oncostatic action (antagonism) |
Pirozzoli et al. 12 | ELF‐EMF |
50 Hz, 1 mT 3 days |
Neuroblastoma cell line LAN‐5 | Camptothecin | Enhancement of proliferation by blocking melatonin's oncostatic action (antagonism) |
Brisdelli et al. 17 | ELF‐EMF |
50 Hz, 1 mT 72 h |
K562 cells | Quercetin | Protective effect towards apoptosis only at 24 h exposure (antagonism) |
ELF‐EMF exposure following co‐stressor | |||||
Jian et al. 9 | Intermittent |
100 Hz, 0.7 mT 1–3 h |
BEL‐7402 | X‐ray radiotherapy | Significantly higher apoptosis rates (potentiation) |
Ruiz‐Gomez et al. 212 | Pulsed EMF | 1–25 Hz, 1.5 mT; 1 h | Human colon adenocarcinoma (HCA) |
Vincristine Mitomycin Cisplatin |
Increased cytotoxicity (potentiation) |