Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan;12(1):608–617. doi: 10.21037/qims-21-143

Table 2. MRI features of the analyzed liver metastases.

Variables rHGP (n=12) Non-rHGP (n=41) P value
D (cm) 3.62±2.85 2.79±1.91 0.363
Da (cm) 3.93±2.91 2.80±1.90 0.227
ΔD (cm) 0.31±0.43 0.00±0.19 0.001
Number of CRLM, n (%) 0.740
   Single 4 (33.33) 18 (43.90)
   Multiple (≥2) 8 (66.67) 23 (56.10)
Tumor margin after enhancement, n (%) >0.999
   Sharp 3 (25.00) 11 (26.83)
   Unclear 9 (75.00) 30 (73.17)
Rim enhancement, n (%) <0.001
   Yes 12 (100.00) 19 (46.34)
   No 0 (0.00) 22 (53.66)
Perilesional parenchymal enhancement, n (%) 0.058
   Yes 9 (75.00) 18 (43.90)
   No 3 (25.00) 23 (56.10)

Non-rHGP: including the desmoplastic histopathological growth pattern and the pushing histopathological growth pattern; D: the longest tumor diameter on precontrast T1WI; Da: the longest tumor diameter on arterial phase images; ΔD: the tumor diameter difference between the precontrast and arterial phase images. MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; rHGP, replacement histopathological growth pattern; CRLM, colorectal liver metastasis; T1WI, T1-weighted images.