Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan;12(1):333–340. doi: 10.21037/qims-21-55

Table 2. Comparison of aneurysm diameters at 3-, 4-, and 5-year follow-up to paired baseline data.

Time point Baseline diameter [mm, median (IQR)] Follow-up diameter [mm, median (IQR)] Significance
3 years (n=53) 43.5 (42.0–45.5) 43.9 (42.2–45.5) P=0.02
4 years (n=38) 43.0 (42.0–45.4) 43.9 (41.8–45.5) P=0.33
5 years (n=22) 45.0 (42.6–47.0) 45.2 (43.0–48.2) P=0.10

, for patients with multiple scans across the follow-up period, all available scans were compared to baseline imaging; , values with P<0.05 were considered statistically significant. IQR, interquartile range.