Table 1.

List of HRRs with 0% and 100% Compliance

0%-compliant HRRs (26)	100%-compliant HRRs (20)
AR—Fort Smith	AZ—Sun City
AR—Texarkana	CT—Bridgeport
CA—Salinas	GA—Albany
CA—Ventura	IL—Bloomington
DE—Wilmington	IN—Lafayette
FL—Clearwater	IN—Muncie
FL—Lakeland	KY—Covington
FL—Ormond Beach	KY—Owensboro
FL—St. Petersburg	MI—Dearborn
FL—Tampa	MI—Flint
IA—Cedar Rapids	MI—Petoskey
IA—Waterloo	MI—St. Joseph
IL—Hinsdale	NC—Hickory
LA—Alexandria	NJ—Paterson
MD—Salisbury	PA—Harrisburg
MD—Takoma Park	PA—Lancaster
MS—Meridian	PA—York
NJ—Ridgewood	TN—Johnson City
OH—Elyria	TN—Kingsport
SC—Florence	VA—Winchester
TX—Corpus Christi
VA—Lynchburg
VA—Newport News
VA—Norfolk
VA—Richmond
WA—Yakima

Compliance % is equivalent to the average compliance rating (0 or 1) in the HRR. T tests for comparison of the means between HRRs with 0% compliance vs HRRs with 100% compliance: # of hospitals (5.01 vs 4.05; P = 0.22); HHI (0.54 vs 0.69; P = 0.04); % for-profit hospitals (0.12 vs 0.04; P = 0.15); % government hospitals (0.12 vs 0.10; P = 0.79); % system-affiliated hospitals (0.74 vs 0.79; P = 0.62); % non-urban hospitals (0.71 vs 0.56; P = 0.16); % teaching hospitals (0.30 vs 0.40; P = 0.31); # of discharges (4722 vs 3866; P = 0.52); IT preparedness (0.03 vs 0.02; P = 0.91); profit margin (0.05 vs 0.04; P = 0.68); charge markup (4.95 vs 4.30; P = 0.26); % Medicare discharge (0.38 vs 0.36; P = 0.54), and % Medicaid (0.07 vs 0.05; P = 0.20)