Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec;111(12):2227–2238. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2021.306509

TABLE 3—

Intervention Effects (Intent-to-Treat) on Violence at Round 3: Tanzania Adolescent Cash Plus Study, 2019, Iringa and Mbeya Regions of Tanzania

Variables Cash Plus, No. (%) Cash Only, No. (%) b (95% CI)
Male participants
Experienced 236 239
 Emotional violence 58 (25) 77 (32) −0.07 (−0.16, 0.01)
 Physical violence 23 (10) 30 (13) −0.01 (−0.07, 0.05)
 Sexual violence 5 (2) 11 (5) −0.03 (−0.07, 0.01)
Sought help 65 90
 Any 24 (37) 34 (38) 0.00 (−0.17, 0.16)
 Formal 6 (9) 7 (8) 0.01 (−0.07, 0.09)
 Informal 21 (32) 26 (29) 0.05 (−0.10, 0.20)
Perpetrated 236 239
 Emotional violence 10 (4) 13 (5) −0.01 (−0.05, 0.03)
 Physical violence 5 (2) 20 (8) −0.06 (−0.10, −0.02)
Female participants
Experienced 204 225
 Emotional violence 68 (33) 78 (35) −0.01 (−0.11, 0.09)
 Physical violence 26 (13) 28 (12) 0.00 (−0.06, 0.06)
 Sexual violence 5 (2) 15 (7) −0.05 (−0.10, 0.00)
Sought help 83 91
 Any 37 (45) 42 (46) −0.05 (−0.20, 0.10)
 Formal 5 (6) 4 (4) 0.02 (−0.06, 0.10)
 Informal 33 (40) 39 (43) −0.06 (−0.21, 0.10)
Perpetrated 204 225
 Emotional violence 9 (4) 15 (7) −0.02 (−0.08, 0.03)
 Physical violence 11 (5) 10 (4) 0.01 (−0.03, 0.06)

Note. CI = confidence interval. Linear probability models, by gender. Models controlled for age, gender, and stratum (district and village size); only coefficients on treatment indicator are shown. Standard errors are clustered at the community level.