Table 3.
Summary of findings: | ||||||
Effect of bariatric surgery on circulating levels of oxidized low-density lipoproteins in obese patients | ||||||
Patient or population: obese patients Setting: - Intervention: bariatric surgery Comparison: - | ||||||
| ||||||
Outcome no. of participants (studies) | Relative effect (95% CI) | Anticipated absolute effects (95% CI) | Certainty | What happens | ||
Difference | ||||||
| ||||||
Ox_LDL levels (ox-LDL) assessed with: ELISA/Mercodia/immunodiagnostic/OxiSelect follow-up: range 6 months to 7 years no. of participants: 470 (11 observational studies) | — | The mean ox-LDL levels were 0 | — | 0 (0 to 0) | ⨁⨁◯◯ Lowa,b,c |
|
∗The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI). CI: confidence interval | ||||||
| ||||||
GRADE working group grades of evidence High certainty: we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect. Moderate certainty: we are moderately confident in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different. Low certainty: our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: the true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect. Very low certainty: we have very little confidence in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect. |