Skip to main content
The Journal of Reproduction and Development logoLink to The Journal of Reproduction and Development
editorial
. 2021 Oct 7;67(6):337–339. doi: 10.1262/jrd.2021-090

Unilateral twin pregnancy: A non-infectious factor required for the etiological diagnosis of abortion in dairy herds

Fernando LÓPEZ-GATIUS 1,2, Irina GARCIA-ISPIERTO 1,3, Christian HANZEN 4
PMCID: PMC8668370  PMID: 34615839

Abstract

Twin pregnancies are classified into bilateral (one fetus in each uterine horn: 44%) and unilateral (both fetuses in the same uterine horn, right or left: 56%). The incidence of abortion during mid- to late gestation is approximately 1% in cows carrying bilateral twins and more than 40% in cows carrying unilateral twins. In this period, abortion seems most commonly associated with infectious agents. However, although this imbalanced abortion rate may imply that unilateral twin pregnancy is a non-infectious abortion factor, few available data can describe the cause of abortions in twin pregnancies. The current findings suggest that unilateral twin pregnancy is a non-infectious factor required for the etiological diagnosis of abortion in dairy herds.

Keywords: Double ovulation, Infectious abortion, Non-infectious abortion, Timing of abortion

Introduction

A high incidence of abortion may have devastating consequences on dairy herd profitability [1]. Significant pregnancy losses due to non-infectious causes occur during the first 60 days of gestation [2,3,4,5], whereas infections are more common causes of abortion during mid- to late gestation [6,7,8,9]. Twin pregnancy, a main non-infectious factor associated with pregnancy loss during the first trimester of gestation [4], is classified into bilateral (one fetus in each uterine horn: 44%) and unilateral (both fetuses in the same uterine horn, right or left: 56%) [10]. It was recently reported that more than 40% of cows carrying unilateral twins on Day 60 may suffer abortion during the second or third trimester of gestation [10, 11]. This article focuses on the poor control of twin pregnancies within clinical reproductive control programs and places particular emphasis on their effects against the maintenance of pregnancy at the mid-gestation. The authors propose unilateral twin pregnancy as an additional non-infectious factor required for the etiological diagnosis of abortion in dairy herds.

Problem of twin pregnancies in dairy herds

The first problem with twin pregnancy is diagnostic accuracy. Although the embryo can be detected by ultrasound between Days 25 and 30 of gestation [12], the period in which pregnancy diagnosis is usually performed in herds, the accuracy of a twin pregnancy diagnosis is lower until Day 30 [4]. The embryo is close to the endometrium from Day 25 to 30 and often difficult to find, particularly in cases of a single pregnancy in older cows [13] or twin pregnancies [4]. In contrast, from Day 30 onwards, making a pregnancy diagnosis is easier because the embryos are surrounded by fluid [13]. Further efforts should be made to identify twins in cows with two or more corpora lutea at the time of pregnancy diagnosis, particularly when two corpora lutea are present in the same ovary. Assessment of the presence of twins or singletons on Day 60 of gestation would be appropriate since placentation is fully established [12, 14] and the chances of fetal loss are much lower [2].

Spontaneous embryo reduction has been described in twin pregnancies in cows that remain pregnant, with an incidence of 6.2% [15], 11.2% [16], and 28.4% [17]. Interestingly, most cases of single-embryo mortality in twins occur before Days 36–42 of gestation and rarely occur after Day 60 [15]. This means that the fate of pregnancies involving live twins on Day 60 is twin birth or abortion.

The incidence and timing of abortion in dairy cows carrying twins was reported for a study population of 1194 cows [10]. The presence of live twins was determined by transrectal ultrasonography between 55 and 61 days of gestation, and the pregnancy was confirmed 60 days later. Abortion was recorded in 23.3% (278/1194) of cows before Day 260 of pregnancy: 1.3% (7/522) in bilateral and 40.3% (271/672) in unilateral twin pregnancies. The mean date of abortions was Day 174 of gestation (range, 135–249). Pregnancy was also monitored in a further study of 615 unilateral multiple pregnancies until abortion or parturition with similar results [11]. The abortion rate before 260 days of gestation in cows maintaining live twins at 58–64 days after insemination was 42.6% and the average time to abortion was 176 days (range, 122–251 days) [11]. Only cows testing seronegative for Neospora caninum were included in both studies [10, 11]. In previous clinical trials of the same herds, the abortion rate for Neospora-seropositive cattle during the second and third trimesters of gestation was 30% [18, 19], whereas only 1.9% (heifers plus parous cows [18]) and 4.2% (parous cows [19]) of their seronegative partners aborted. In these herds, cows were brucellosis-free, vaccination programs were undertaken to prevent bovine viral diarrhea, and infectious bovine rhinotracheitis, brucellosis, and neosporosis were tested for annually [18, 19].

Preventing infections and confirming non-infectious abortions in dairy herds is not easy. However, the latter studies were performed in well-managed herds subjected to efficient vaccination programs against infectious agents. In this context, abortions of unilateral twin pregnancies should not be considered of infectious cause [10, 11]. The fact that only 1.3% of cows carrying bilateral twins aborted [10] reinforces this assumption. Conversely, a cow factor may provide a good explanation. Mechanical stress due to a lack of space in the case of unilateral twins could add to the metabolic stress of high milk production and perhaps explain why the risk of abortion was higher in the middle than at the end of the lactation period. In fact, using cows that aborted from 215 to 249 days of gestation as reference, the odds ratio for abortion during the period of 135 to 154 days of gestation was 3 (43% of aborting cows; P < 0.0001) [10].

Hence, the negative economic impact of twin pregnancy is not only attributable to losses incurred during the first trimester of gestation; this impact may be larger because of the incidence of cows suffering abortion during the second or third trimester of gestation.

Significance and impact of twinning

Twinning is not desirable in dairy herds, as it compromises a cow’s subsequent health and productive lifespan. In essence, twin births increase the risk of reproductive disorders such as dystocia, perinatal mortality, retained fetal membranes, metritis, and longer calving to conception interval [20,21,22,23]. Both a higher culling rate and reduced mean production lifespan (by 200 days) have been reported for cows delivering twins versus singletons [21, 22]. The twinning rate can reach 12% in some herds [24], and the economic impact of twinning is likely to rise. Genetics appears to be a major regulatory factor for twinning rates. An analysis of data involving 37,174 sires showed that those born after 1990 had a higher incidence of twins (5.6%) than those born before 1981 (4.6%) [25]. In an epidemiological study of 52,362 lactations, the rate of twinning increased from 1.4% in 1983 to 2.4% in 1993, with a concurrent increase in milk production as the single most important reason for this increase [26]. Genetic progress and improvements in nutrition and management practices linked to a continuous increase in milk yield suggest that the twinning rate is set to increase further over the years to come.

Concluding remarks

In the setting of dairy herds under ever-increasing pressure to improve efficiency, twin pregnancies clearly reduce profitability. A substantial peak in losses, normally exceeding 30% of pregnancies, occurs before Day 60 of gestation, when placentation is completed in the cow [12, 14]. Such losses are likely the result of the high sensitivity of placentation to any type of stress [2,3,4,5]. Following this peak, the first abortion of unilateral twin pregnancies may be registered at the start of the fifth month, the period when abortion is extensively associated with infectious agents. Interest in twin pregnancies during the first trimester of gestation is growing [4, 27]. However, data describing the proportion of twin pregnancies that ultimately result in twins are scarce [10, 11]. A high incidence of abortions in the middle of gestation is probably the single most important factor affecting herd profitability. The risk assessment of abortion is a component of the dairy industry policy. Since the fate of twin pregnancies in which both embryos are alive on Day 60 is either twin birth or abortion, the assessment of live unilateral twins on Day 60 of gestation has considerable clinical implications for the risk assessment of subsequent abortion. Overall, we may reasonably conclude that unilateral twin pregnancies should be considered a non-infectious factor required for the etiological diagnosis of abortion during mid- to late gestation in dairy herds.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Ana Burton for her assistance with English editing.

References

  • 1.Cabrera VE. A simple formulation and solution to the replacement problem: a practical tool to assess the economic cow value, the value of a new pregnancy, and the cost of a pregnancy loss. J Dairy Sci 2012; 95: 4683–4698. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ball PJH. Late embryo and early fetal mortality in the cow. Anim Breed Abstr 1997; 65: 167–175. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Grimard B, Freret S, Chevallier A, Pinto A, Ponsart C, Humblot P. Genetic and environmental factors influencing first service conception rate and late embryonic/foetal mortality in low fertility dairy herds. Anim Reprod Sci 2006; 91: 31–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.López-Gatius F, García-Ispierto I. Ultrasound and endocrine findings that help to assess the risk of late embryo/early foetal loss by non-infectious cause in dairy cattle. Reprod Domest Anim 2010; 45(Suppl 3): 15–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ealy AD, Seekford ZK. Symposium review: Predicting pregnancy loss in dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci 2019; 102: 11798–11804. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Anderson ML. Infectious causes of bovine abortion during mid- to late-gestation. Theriogenology 2007; 68: 474–486. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Yoo HS. Infectious causes of reproductive disorders in cattle. J Reprod Dev 2010; 56(Suppl): S53–S60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Reichel MP, Wahl LC, Hill FI. Review of diagnostic procedures and approaches to infectious causes of reproductive failures of cattle in Australia and New Zealand. Front Vet Sci 2018; 5: 222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wolf-Jäckel GA, Hansen MS, Larsen G, Holm E, Agerholm JS, Jensen TK. Diagnostic studies of abortion in Danish cattle 2015–2017. Acta Vet Scand 2020; 62: 1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Garcia-Ispierto I, López-Gatius F. Abortion in dairy cattle with advanced twin pregnancies: Incidence and timing. Reprod Domest Anim 2019; 54(Suppl 4): 50–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.López-Gatius F, Garcia-Ispierto I, Hunter RHF. Twin pregnancies in dairy cattle: Observations in a large herd of Holstein-Friesian dairy cows. Animals (Basel) 2020; 10: 2165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Curran S, Pierson RA, Ginther OJ. Ultrasonographic appearance of the bovine conceptus from days 20 through 60. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1986; 189: 1295–1302. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hughes EA, Davies DAR. Practical uses of ultrasound in early pregnancy in cattle. Vet Rec 1989; 124: 456–458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Riding GA, Lehnert SA, French AJ, Hill JR. Conceptus-related measurements during the first trimester of bovine pregnancy. Vet J 2008; 175: 266–272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.López-Gatius F, Hunter RHF. Spontaneous reduction of advanced twin embryos: its occurrence and clinical relevance in dairy cattle. Theriogenology 2005; 63: 118–125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Silva-Del-Río N, Colloton JD, Fricke PM. Factors affecting pregnancy loss for single and twin pregnancies in a high-producing dairy herd. Theriogenology 2009; 71: 1462–1471. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.López-Gatius F, García-Ispierto I, Hunter RHF. Factors affecting spontaneous reduction of corpora lutea and twin embryos during the late embryonic/early fetal period in multiple-ovulating dairy cows. Theriogenology 2010; 73: 293–299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.López-Gatius F, Pabón M, Almería S. Neospora caninum infection does not affect early pregnancy in dairy cattle. Theriogenology 2004; 62: 606–613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.López-Gatius F, Santolaria P, Almería S. Neospora caninum infection does not affect the fertility of dairy cows in herds with high incidence of Neospora-associated abortions. J Vet Med B Infect Dis Vet Public Health 2005; 52: 51–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Nielen M, Schukken YH, Scholl DT, Wilbrink HJ, Brand A. Twinning in dairy cattle: A study of risk factors and effects. Theriogenology 1989; 32: 845–862. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Bicalho RC, Cheong SH, Galvão KN, Warnick LD, Guard CL. Effect of twin birth calvings on milk production, reproductive performance, and survival of lactating cows. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2007; 231: 1390–1397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Andreu-Vázquez C, Garcia-Ispierto I, Ganau S, Fricke PM, López-Gatius F. Effects of twinning on the subsequent reproductive performance and productive lifespan of high-producing dairy cows. Theriogenology 2012; 78: 2061–2070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Sawa A, Jankowska M, Neja W, Krężel-Czopek S. Effect of single and multiple pregnancies and calf sex on parturition process and perinatal mortality. Ann Anim Sci 2014; 14: 851–858. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Silva del Río N, Stewart S, Rapnicki P, Chang YM, Fricke PM. An observational analysis of twin births, calf sex ratio, and calf mortality in Holstein dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci 2007; 90: 1255–1264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Johanson JM, Bergert PJ, Kirkpatrick BW, Dentine MR. Twinning rates for North American Holstein sires. J Dairy Sci 2001; 84: 2081–2088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kinsel ML, Marsh WE, Ruegg PL, Etherington WG. Risk factors for twinning in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 1998; 81: 989–993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.López-Gatius F, Andreu-Vázquez C, Mur-Novales R, Cabrera VE, Hunter RHF. The dilemma of twin pregnancies in dairy cattle. A review of practical prospects. Livest Sci 2017; 197: 12–16. [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Reproduction and Development are provided here courtesy of The Society for Reproduction and Development

RESOURCES