Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 13;11:23806. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-03325-5

Table 1.

Frequencies of unmodified sequences at candidate off-target sites analyzed by deep sequencinga.

Piglet MSTN_OT1 (%) MSTN_OT2 (%) MSTN_OT3 (%)
Controlb 22,986/23,492 (97.85) 27,329/27,649 (98.84) 22,216/22,512 (98.69)
#1 17,469/17,785 (98.22) 18,918/19,165 (98.71) 13,355/13,495 (98.96)
#2 20,386/20,833 (97.85) 18,798/19,049 (98.68) 16,906/17,143 (98.62)
#3 20,346/20,739 (98.11) 19,799/20,038 (98.81) 18,951/19,193 (98.74)
#4 22,710/23,187 (97.94) 18,717/18,928 (98.89) 19,321/19,592 (98.62)
#5 19,655/20,030 (98.13) 21,168/21,429 (98.78) 19,918/20,152 (98.84)
#6 17,406/17,702 (98.33) 21,302/21,529 (98.95) 12,042/12,167 (98.97)
#7 17,653/17,978 (98.19) 20,003/20,250 (98.78) 20,341/20,550 (98.98)
#8 19,605/20,006 (98.0) 21,832/22,117 (98.71) 11,236/11,351 (98.99)
#9 24,726/25,196 (98.13) 25,132/25,430 (98.83) 19,907/20,157 (98.76)

aThe frequency was defined as the ratio of the number of unmodified reads to the total number of aligned reads.

bA DNA sample derived from a wild-type pig, not subjected to any gene editing technique, was used as the control.