Table 2.
Effects of frequency of remote communication and LDR status on relationship satisfaction.
| Variable | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | SE | b | SE | b | SE | |
| Fixed effects | ||||||
| Intercept | 29.57*** | .25 | 29.69*** | .26 | 29.56*** | .26 |
| LDR status (LDR = 1, GCR = 0) | −.276 | .410 | −.610 | .458 | −.811 | .468 |
| Video calling frequency | .037 | .168 | −.257 | .214 | ||
| Voice calling frequency | .483* | .195 | .827** | .245 | ||
| Texting frequency | .631* | .274 | .104 | .342 | ||
| LDR status X video calling frequency | .712* | .343 | ||||
| LDR status X voice calling frequency | −.832* | .401 | ||||
| LDR status X texting frequency | 1.355* | .566 | ||||
| Estimate | Estimate | Estimate | ||||
| Fit statistics | ||||||
| Adjusted R square | −.001 | .019 | .033 | |||
| F change | .45 | 5.35** | 4.16** | |||
Note. LDR = long-distance relationship; GCR = geographically close relationship.
*p<.05, **p<.01, ***p<.001.