TABLE 1.
Summary statistics for RNA sequencing dataa
| Species | No. of reads (million) | % mapped | % fungal | % detected | % detected (>10) | Cor (±mac) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C. albicans | 16.8–23.3 | 99.0–99.1 | 97.1–99.0 | 95.4–96.8 | 89.8–92.2 | 1.00/1.00 |
| C. dubliniensis | 15.5–22.9 | 98.3–99.0 | 94.8–99.0 | 97.9–99.3 | 92.3–95.7 | 1.00/0.94 |
| C. tropicalis | 15.3–24.8 | 92.9–97.8 | 83.4–97.8 | 96.1–98.2 | 90.1–93.6 | 0.94/1.00 |
| C. parapsilosis | 15.3–20.5 | 99.2–99.5 | 98.1–99.3 | 99.1–99.5 | 96.1–97.6 | 0.99/0.99 |
| L. elongisporus | 14.2–57.8 | 98.0–98.4 | 96.5–98.3 | 97.3–98.5 | 92.0–96.1 | 0.93/0.99 |
| C. lusitaniae | 15.1–20.0 | 99.0–99.0 | 95.3–99.0 | 96.9–98.1 | 90.2–93.1 | 0.99/1.00 |
a
For each species, number of reads passing quality filters, the percentage mapped to mouse or fungal genomes, the percentage mapped to fungal genomes, and the percentage of genes detected by at least one or 10 reads are shown, with intervals indicating range across samples. Spearman correlation coefficients of transcript abundance between replicates for each species and each condition (with or without macrophages) [Cor (±mac)] are also provided, with all intersample correlations provided in Fig. S1B.