Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Dec 14.
Published in final edited form as: Appl Ergon. 2020 May 8;87:103139. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103139

Table 5:

Pain Symptom Comparison by Exposure and Intervention Usage Groups*

Measure Exposure / Intervention Usage Groups All Interventions Ergonomic Material Handling Only (Anti-fatigue Mats Excluded)
N Surveys Mean Effect of Intervention** N Surveys Mean Effect of Intervention**
NASS-Pain Frequency > 0 1 592 58.3% −46.8% (−100.4%, 6.9%) 554 56.1% 52.5% (101.3%,3.7%)
2 172 73.3% 162 71.6%
3 56 66.1% 53 66.0%
4 148 79.1% 146 78.8%
NASS-Neuro Frequency > 0 1 592 40.9% −9.1% (−90.3%, 72%) 554 39.2% −14.3% (−94.1%, 65.4%)
2 172 57.0% 162 54.9%
3 56 48.2% 53 49.1%
4 148 57.4% 146 56.9%
DASH-Disability Frequency > 0 1 592 52.4% −31.7% (−92.4%, 29%) 554 51.1% −17.2% (−93.9%, 59.5%)
2 172 54.1% 162 54.3%
3 56 55.4% 53 52.8%
4 148 62.2% 146 61.6%
DASH-Work Frequency > 0 1 592 26.2% −2.1% (−86.8%, 82.6%) 554 25.1% −7.1% (−90.1%, 75.9%)
2 172 31.4% 162 30.3%
3 56 28.6% 53 28.3%
4 148 40.5% 146 40.4%
Annual Upper Extremity Symptom Frequency > 0 1 197 58.9% 86.6% (−96.6%, −47.9%) 183 57.9% 88% (−105.1%, −70.9%)
2 57 52.6% 53 50.9%
3 21 42.9% 20 40.0%
4 68 79.4% 67 79.1%
Annual Low Back Symptom Frequency > 0 1 197 34.5% −59.2% (−89.4%, 57.5%) 183 33.9% 63.9% (−115.4%, −12.4%)
2 57 45.6% 53 45.3%
3 21 57.1% 20 55.0%
4 68 58.8% 67 59.7%
NASS-Pain Severity Scaled 1 592 16.1 −7% (−19.3%, 7.2%) 554 15.8 −9.8% (−23.2%, 3.6%)
2 172 17.7 162 17.4
3 56 16.7 53 16.8
4 148 19.6 146 19.6
NASS-Neuro Severity Scaled 1 592 8.3 0% (−19.4%, 24.1%) 554 8.2 −6.3% (−27.1%, 14.6%)
2 172 9.3 162 9.1
3 56 9.2 53 9.3
4 148 9.3 146 9.3
DASH-Disability Severity 1 592 7.9 28.8% (−46.2%, −5.7%) 554 7.5 30.1% (−50.1%, −10.1%)
2 172 8.9 162 8.6
3 56 8.2 53 7.3
4 148 11.4 146 11.4
DASH-Work Severity 1 592 6.5 39.9% (−58.8%, −12.1%) 554 6.2 44.7% (−66.5%, −22.9%)
2 172 7.5 162 7.2
3 56 7.4 53 7.6
4 148 11.8 146 11.9
*

One company performing seasonal work was not included.

**

Based on comparing Groups 2 and 4, with 95th percentile confidence intervals shown

• Group 1: Least Exposed

• Group 2: Highly Exposed Intervention User

• Group 3: Highly Exposed Other

• Group 4: Highly Exposed Body User