Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 11;38(4):617–627. doi: 10.5114/biolsport.2021.102932

TABLE 1.

Summary of the study characteristics.

Reference Study design Participants (N) Age (yo; mean ± SD) and sex (M, W) Competitive level Acute effects (Outcomes) Adaptations (Outcomes)
Castillo et al. [26] Parallel study 16 25.6 ± 7.6 yo ND Professional Internal load (RPE) Sprinting (5-, 10-, 15-, 20-, 30- and 40-m)
Aerobic (YYIRT-L1)

Harrison et al. [17] Parallel study 26 13.9 ± 0.3 yo Men Youth Internal load (HR)
External load (BL)
Aerobic (V̇ O2peak; VIFT)
Sprinting (5-, 20-m)
Jumping (CMJ)

Köklü et al. [27] Within-subject repeated measures 18 18.2 ± 0.5 yo Men Youth Internal load (HR, lactate and RPE)
External load (TD; MS) Technical (touches of the ball, passes, tackles, turnover)
-

Paul et al. [25] Parallel study 19 16.2 ± 0.8 yo Men Youth Internal load (HR) Aerobic (VIFT)
Jumping (CMJ)
Change-of-direction (modified L run test)

Rabbani et al. [18] Parallel study 21 23.2–24.1 ± 2.2–3.7 yo Men Semi-professional Internal load (RPE) Aerobic (V IFT)

ND: not described; M: men; W: women; HR: heart rate; RPE: rated of perceived exertion; TD: total distance; HI-MP: high intensity metabolic power; YYIRT-L1: yo-yo intermittent recovery test level 1; m: meters; BL: body load; V̇O2peak: maximal oxygen uptake; VIFT: final velocity at 30–15 intermittent fitness test; CMJ: countermovement jump; MS: maximum speed; SD: standard-deviation