Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 11;38(4):639–652. doi: 10.5114/biolsport.2021.101602

TABLE 1.

Description of the flywheel devices, monitoring technologies, real-time mechanical variables and training outcomes

Study TS Sample ST Exercise Assessment device MI (kg m 2) Volume per exercise (F/S/R) Real time variables measured CON ECC
Aagaard et al. [28] A 21 elite soccer players HC Single-leg extension Strain gauge, Dynamometer Unclear 1 session x 1 week /
4 x 16
Peak speed,
Peak torque,
Peak power, Torque
Power at 50% of
CON
Yes No
Berg & Tesch [32] A 11 physically active men HC Leg press Strain gauge,
Linear potentiometer,
EMG
? 1 session x 1 week /
1 x 10
Mean force,
Peak force,
Momentary speed,
Mean Power, Mean
Work, EMG
Yes Yes
Tesch et al. [23] C 10 physically active subjects (men = 7 and women = 3) HC Single-leg extension Strain gauge ? 2–3 session x 5 weeks /
4 x 7
Mean force, Peak power Yes Yes
Caruso et al [49] A 31 physically active subjects
(men = 13 and
women = 18)
HC Calf press Force platform,
EMG
? 1 session x 1 week /
3 x 10
Mean work,
Mean power,
EMG
Yes Yes
Chiu &
Salem
[16]
A 11physically active
(men = 5 and women = 6
VC Lunge, Front squat, Push press Force platform,
8-camera optoelectronic motion
capture system
? 1 session x 1 week /
3 x 3
Net joint impulse,
Net join moment,
Net joint power,
Relative impulse
Yes Yes
Pozzo et al. [33] A 9 physically active men HC Single-leg extension Strain gauge, Potentiometer, ? 2 sessions x 1 week /
1 x 30
Momentary torque,
EMG,
CV, iMNF,
ARV
Yes Yes
Tous-Fajardo et al. [50] A 20 male soccer/rugby players HC Leg curl Strain gauge, linear encoder, EMG 0.11,
0.22
1 session / 1 x 6 Peak force
Mean force,
Peak power,
Mean power, Peak speed,
Mean speed,
EMGrms,
EMG-E:C-r
Yes Yes
Norrbrand et al. [27] C 15 physically active men HC Single-leg extension Strain gauge, Linear encoder 0.11 2–3 session x 5 weeks /
4 x 7
Mean speed,
Total work, Peak power, Mean power, Peak force,
Mean force,
Yes Yes
Norrbrand et al. [1] C 9 physically active men HC Single-leg extension EMG 0.11 2–3 session x 5 weeks /
4 x 7
Normalized EMG, EMGrms Yes Yes
Norrbrand et al. [51] A 10 trained men HC Leg press Strain gauge,
Linear encoder,
EMG
0.14 1 session / 5 x 10 Peak force,
Mean force,
Normalized EMG
Yes Yes
Carmona et al. [52] A 10 physically active men VC Half-squat Strain gauge and linear encoder Minimum cone radius 1 session / 7 x 10 Momentary speed,
Momentary force,
Peak power,
Mean power,
Yes Yes
Fernandez-Gonzalo et al. [2] C 32 physically active subjects
(men = 16, women = 16)
HC Leg press Encoder 0.14 2–3 sessions x 6 weeks /
4 x 7
Peak power,
Mean power,
EO (%)
Yes Yes
Coratella et al. [3] A 13 physically active men - Squat Encoder ? 2 sessions / 10 x 10 Peak power, Mean power Yes Yes
Moras et al. [53] A 21 physically active men VC Squat Strain gauge, Linear encoder 0.27 1 session / 6 x 6 Peak force,
Mean force,
Mean speed
Yes Yes
Vázquez-Guerrero et al. [17] A 13 male
national-level sprinters
VC Squat Strain gauge 0.12,
0.27
1 session / 4 x 3 Peak force, Mean force Yes Yes
Martinez-Aranda et al. [26] A 22 physically active subjects
(men = 11 and
women = 11)
HC Single-leg extension Strain gauge, Rotary encoder, 0.0125,
0.025,
0.0375 ,
0.05 ,
0.075 ,
0.1
1 session / 6 x 3 Peak force,
Mean force,
Coupling CON-ECC
time,
SSC,
Momentary torque,
Power (only CON)
Work (only CON)
EO
Yes Yes
Nuñez et al. [18] A 15 rugby players VC High Pull Linear encoder,
Force platform
Maximal cone radius 2 sessions / 6 x 6 Peak speed,
Peak acceleration,
Mean propulsive speed,
Mean propulsive acceleration, Mean force,
Peak force
Yes Yes
Sabido et al. [54] C 18 handball players HC Half-squat, Lunge Rotary encoder 0.05 1 session x 7 weeks /
2 x 8 per exercise
Mean Power, Peak Power Yes Yes
Illera-Domínguez et al. [55] C 10 young resistance
training naive
HC Squat Friction encoder 0.09 2–3 sessions x 4 weeks /
5 x 10
Mean force, Mean power Yes Yes
Sabido et al. [24] A 24 high-level handball players HC Quarter-squat Rotary encoder 0.025,
0.050,
0.075,
0.100
1 session x 4 weeks / days of 4x10 + 1 x15 per load Peak power, E:C-r Yes Yes
Alkner et al. [29] A 8 physically active men HC Leg press Strain gauge,
EMG
0.1105 1 session / 1 x 8 EMG Yes Yes
Carroll et al. [15] A 17 physically active subjects
(men = 16, women = 1)
HC Squat Force plateforms,
EMG
0.01,
0.025,
0.050,
0.060
0.075
0.1
1 session /2 x 13
+
1 session /
1 x 13
Peak force,
Peak velocity
EMG
Yes Yes
Castillo et al. [57] A 24 physically active men HC Half-squat Rotary encoder 0.025,
0.05,
0.075,
0.1
2 sessions x 1 week /
4 x 8
Peak power, Mean power Yes Yes
Maroto-Izquierdo et al. [58] C 10 physically active men HC Single-leg squat Rotary encoder 0.05 2 sessions x 6 weeks / 5 x 3 Peak power Yes Yes
Piqueras-Sanchiz et al. [30] A 20 physically active men (10 per load) HC Lunge Rotary encoder 0.075, 0.1 1 session x 1 week / 4 x 7 Peak power, Mean
power, Mean speed
Yes Yes
Núñez et al. [19] A 22 physically active men HC
VC
Half-squat Force platforms,
Linear encoder
0.11,
0.22,
0.33
2 session x 1 week / 3 x 7 Peak force,
Peak speed, Mean
force, Impulse
Yes Yes
Raya-Gonzalez et al. [20] A 20 young elite soccer players
(U17)
HC Half-squat
Lateral squat
Rotary encoder 0.025
(Half-squat),
0.01
(Lateral squat)
2 session x 1 week / 2 x
6 (per exercise)
Mean power, Peak
power
Yes Yes
Worcester et al. [25] A 9 physically active subjects
(male = 3; female = 6)
HC Squat Rotary encoder 0.05,
0.075,
0.1
1 session x 1 week / 3 x 6 Mean power, Mean force,
Mean speed,
Yes Yes

Note: HC: horizontal cylinder; VC: vertical cone; E:C-r = eccentric:concentric ratio; EO: eccentric overload; CV: conduction velocity; iMNF: instantaneous mean power spectral frequency; ARV: mean rectified value; F/S/R: frequency / sets / repetitions; D: study; CON: concentric; ECC: eccentric; EMG: electromyography; EMGrms: electromyography root mean square; SSC: stretch-shortening cycle; ? = data not provided by authors; MI = moment of inertia.