Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 3;53:101044. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2021.101044

Table 2.

Demographics of the sample.

Baseline 2 Year FU p
n 8086 5957
interview_age (months), mean (SD) 119.21 (7.52) 143.22 (7.76) < 0.001
sex = M, n (%) 4158 (51.4) 3203 (53.8) 0.006
household.income, n (%) < 0.001
 [< 50 K] 2215 (27.4) 1381 (23.2)
 [> =50 K & < 100 K] 2311 (28.6) 1687 (28.3)
 [> =100 K] 3560 (44.0) 2889 (48.5)
high.educ, n (%) 0.461
 < HS Diploma 291 (3.6) 215 (3.6)
 HS Diploma/GED 599 (7.4) 462 (7.8)
 Some College 2029 (25.1) 1421 (23.9)
 Bachelor 2197 (27.2) 1612 (27.1)
 Post Graduate Degree 2970 (36.7) 2247 (37.7)
race.4level, n (%) 0.366
 White 5460 (68.2) 4094 (69.3)
 Black 1042 (13.0) 714 (12.1)
 Asian 171 (2.1) 119 (2.0)
 Other/Mixed 1330 (16.6) 978 (16.6)
ethnicity, n (%) 0.269
 hisp = Yes (%) 1583 (19.6) 1121 (18.8)
rel_group_id (twin status), n (%) 0.847
 Singleton (1) 7433 (91.9) 5464 (91.7)
 Twin (2) 643 (8.0) 484 (8.1)
 Triplet (3) 10 (0.1) 9 (0.2)

Demographic data a shown for age in months (mean, (SD)), sex at birth, household income, parental education, self-declared race, endorsement of Hispanic ethnicity and self-declared twin/triplet status (n, (%)). These factors are stratified by time point: baseline and 2-year FU. There were significant differences in income and sex at birth for those who had 2-year FU data in Release 4.0 indicative of differences in the demographics of participants as they were recruited. Participants recruited earlier in the study were more likely to have higher household income and be born male. All of these variables are controlled for in all statistical analyses to account for this. Variable names from the tabulated data release are included in the table for replication.