Table 3.
Comparisons | Leaf blade length | Leaf blade width | Aspect ratio | Circularity | Petiole length | Cupule high | Cupule diameter | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
diff. | P | diff. | P | diff. | P | diff. | P | diff. | P | diff. | P | diff. | P | |
L.bidoupensis – L.blaoensis | 3.92 | 0 | -0.09 | 0.85 | 0.93 | 0 | -0.13 | 0 | 1.39 | 0 | -0.35 | 0 | -0.89 | 0 |
L.bidoupensis – L.licentii | 1.01 | 0.13 | -1.04 | <0.001 | 0.90 | 0 | -0.16 | 0 | 0.31 | 0 | -0.1 | 0.07 | -0.29 | 0 |
L.congtroiensis – L.dahuoaiensis | 4.57 | <0.001 | 2.76 | 0 | -0.45 | <0.001 | 0.11 | 0 | -0.02 | 0.97 | 0.13 | <0.01 | -0.75 | 0 |
L.congtroiensis – L.honbaensis | 5.56 | <0.001 | 3.53 | 0 | -0.09 | 0 | 0.09 | 0 | 0.69 | 0 | - | - | - | - |
L.hongiaoensis – L.vinhensis | -2.39 | <0.001 | -0.29 | 0.26 | -0.43 | <0.001 | 0.08 | <0.001 | -1.85 | 0 | -0.44 | 0 | -0.75 | 0 |
L.hongiaoensis – L.vuquangensis | -3.33 | 0 | -0.58 | <0.001 | -0.20 | 0.09 | 0.02 | 0.55 | -1.29 | 0 | -0.15 | 0.012 | -0.43 | <0.001 |
Note: diff. = mean difference; Bold font indicates statistically significant differences, (-) not available.