Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 22;11(12):e2386. doi: 10.1002/brb3.2386

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Multi‐subject result reveals two types of liars. (a) Results of a similarity analysis between the participants based on classification performance in each of the six DDMs (2 facial muscles × 3 trial events) based on surface electromyography (sEMG) data from the second stage of the experiment (with monetary incentives). A clustering algorithm identified two distinct groups of the participants based on similarity (blue and red squares). The IDs of the two exemplary participants from Figure 2 are highlighted. (b) The number of significant clusters in each of the six DDMs, averaged across the participants of each group. The differences suggest that the blue group's classification mostly relied on data from the eyebrow muscle (CS), and the red group has more classification success using data from the cheek muscle (ZM). (c) The ability of the classification algorithm to detect a participant's deception (measured as maximal classification accuracy) is negatively correlated with the ability of that participant to deceive their human counterpart (Receiver). Each circle represents a participant, colored based on their group belonging (as depicted in (a))