Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 1;12:723271. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.723271

Table 2.

Cox proportional hazards regression model of overall survival in the cancer genome atlas cohort.

Variable Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
HR (95% CI) P* HR (95% CI) P*
Age (≥65 vs. <65 years) 1.23 (0.85, 1.78) 0.273
Sex (female vs. male) 1.26 (0.87, 1.84) 0.228
TNM stage (II vs. I) 1.42 (0.87, 2.32) 0.16 1.07 (0.65, 1.76) 0.792
TNM stage (III vs. I) 2.72 (1.78, 4.15) <0.001 2.06 (1.33, 3.21) 0.001
TNM stage (IV vs. I) 5.44 (1.68, 17.6) 0.005 5.35 (1.65, 17.4) 0.005
Histological grade (3–4 vs. 1–2) 1.14 (0.78, 1.67) 0.489
Ishak score (5–6 vs. 0–4) 0.87 (0.5, 1.5) 0.612
Child–Pugh grade (B–C vs. A) 1.66 (0.82, 3.36) 0.159
Alpha fetoprotein (>200 vs. ≤200 ng/ml) 1.01 (0.61, 1.66) 0.979
Risk score (high vs. low) 1.61 (1.45, 1.79) <0.001 1.56 (1.4, 1.74) <0.001

95% CI, 95% confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; TNM, tumor node metastasis stage.

*Statistically significant p values are given in bold, P < 0.05.