Table V:

Comparison of combined blind and supervised learning using (P1) versus explicit addition of blind and supervised learning using (P2) for the mask in Fig. 2a. Training was performed using 4198 knee slices from the fastMRI Knee dataset. Bold digits indicate that B+S method performed significantly better than the explicit blind + supervised method under paired t-test (P < 0.005).

Recon. Method	Explicit Blind + Supervised	Proposed Blind + Supervised
SSIM	0.938	0.946
PSNR (dB)	34.29	35.53
HFEN	0.495	0.443