Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 15;12:74. doi: 10.1186/s13229-021-00476-0

Table 1.

Clinical profile of the sample with biomotion data

Baseline Follow-up
N ASD NT Comparison N ASD NT Comparison
Sex 77F, 205 M 58F, 146 M 70F, 182 M 51F, 122 M
Age (years)

282 ASD

204 NT

17.1 (5.6) 6–31 17.9 (5.6) 6–31 t(1484) =  − 1.649, p = 0.100 213 ASD/152 NT 18.2 (5.5) 8–32 18.5 (5.4) 8–33 t(1363) =  − 0.568, p = 0.571
Full-scale IQ

278 ASD

203 NT

100.0 (18.3) 55–148 107.0 (14.6) 62–142 t(1479) =  − 4.495, p =  < 0.001 N/A N/A N/A N/A
ADOS-2 social affect CSS 237 ASD 6.0 (2.6) 1–10 N/A 145 ASD 5.9 (2.6) 1–10 N/A
ADOS-2 RRB CSS 237 ASD 4.4 (2.7) 1–10 N/A 145 ASD 4.9 (2.7) 1–10 N/A
SRS-2 T-score (parent)

232 ASD

99 NT

71.7 (11.9) 43–95 46.5 (6.9) 37–71 t(1329) = 19.749, p =  < 0.001 83 ASD/54 NT 73.0 (10.9) 43–90 45.6 (6.8) 37–64 t(1135) = 16.529, p =  < 0.001
Vineland socialisation standard score 233 ASD 71.5 (16.2) 20–119 N/A 171 ASD 76.3 (14.5) 30–111 N/A
Vineland communication standard score 237 ASD 75.5 (15.4) 21–122 N/A 176 ASD 75.2 (15.0) 21–108 N/A

Summary values are Mean (Standard Deviation)