Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 15;21:708. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02642-8

Table 6.

The GRADE assessment for the overall certainty of evidence across studies

Quality assessment Number of patients Effect Quality Importance
Number of studies Design Risk of bias Inconsistency Indirectness Imprecision Other considerations Muscle strength Control Relative (95% CI) Absolute
KES subgroup (follow-up 0–24 weeks; Better indicated by lower values)
 17 randomised trials seriousa

serious

(I2 = 75)

no serious indirectness no serious imprecision none 415 394 SMD 0.86 higher (0.55 to 1.16 higher)

⊕ ⊕ OO

LOW

CRITICAL
TUG subgroup (follow-up 0–24 weeks; Better indicated by lower values)
 9 randomised trials seriousb

serious

(I2 = 60)

no serious indirectness no serious imprecision none 279 264 SMD 0.66 lower (0.94 to 0.38 lower)

⊕ ⊕ OO

LOW

CRITICAL
GS subgroup (follow-up 0–24 weeks; Better indicated by lower values)
 17 randomised trials seriousc

serious

(I2 = 87)

no serious indirectness no serious imprecision none 500 465 SMD 0.82 higher (0.43 to 1.21 higher)

⊕ ⊕ OO

LOW

CRITICAL
CS subgroup (follow-up 0–24 weeks; Better indicated by lower values)
 10 randomised trials seriousd

serious

(I2 = 87)

no serious indirectness no serious imprecision none 313 298 SMD 0.11 higher (0.36 lower to 0.57 higher)

⊕ ⊕ OO

LOW

KES knee extension strength, TUG timed up and go, GS gait speed, CS chair stand

a Of the 17 studies, 6 not performed concealed allocation and 9 were not blinded for assessors

b Of the 9 studies, 6 were not blinded for assessors. c Of the 17 studies, 10 were not blinded for assessors. d Of the 10 studies, 6 were not blinded for assessors