. 2009 Feb 3;11(11):663–671. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-4572.2008.00026.x

Table III.

Simple Correlations (Pearson r) Among Predictor Variables and PPL Responses

	Predictors
	Sex^a	Age	Body weight	Percentage body fat	VO_2max (mL/kg/min)	Training status
TG‐AUC_tot	−0.107	−0.164^b	0.296^b	0.255^b	−0.229^b	0.070
TG‐peak_tot	−0.112	−0.160^b	0.272^b	0.223^b	−0.200^b	−0.082
TG‐AUC_inc	−0.217^b	−0.091	0.239^b	−0.007	−0.047	0.033
TG‐peak_inc	−0.269^b	−0.106	0.215^b	−0.030	−0.063	−0.064

Abbreviations: TG‐AUC_inc, incremental area under the triglyceride curve; TG‐AUC_tot, total area under the triglyceride curve; TG‐peak_inc, incremental triglyceride peak response; TG‐peak_tot, triglyceride peak response; VO_2max, maximal oxygen consumption. Postprandial lipemia (PPL) and exercise PPL trials are combined (N=280). ^aFemale sex was associated with a lower PPL response. ^b r values are significant at P≤0.05.