Table 6.
Variable (n = 82–112) | Pearson correlation | Multiple regression# | ||||||||||
Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | Model 5 | ||||||||
β | p | β | p | β | p | β | p | β | p | β | p | |
LnCys_1 | 0.21 | 0.024 | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | |||||
LntHcy_1 | 0.38 | 0.000 | 0.25 | 0.051 | 0.24 | 0.039 | 0.25 | 0.042 | 0.27 | 0.033 | 0.26 | 0.043 |
0.24$ | 0.083$ | |||||||||||
LnFe_1∧ | –0.08 | 0.457 | –0.23 | 0.026 | –0.18 | 0.086 | ||||||
–0.22$ | 0.041 $ | |||||||||||
LnSi_1∧ | –0.02 | 0.852 | –0.18 | 0.077 | –0.21 | 0.043 | ||||||
LnPhAcase_1 | 0.14 | 0.163 | 0.21 | 0.036 | 0.23 | 0.022 | ||||||
LnBrain Volume_1 | –0.40 | 0.000 | –0.04$ | 0.771$ | ||||||||
Atrophy rate | 0.34 | 0.002 | 0.28 | 0.012 | 0.18 | 0.067 | 0.32 | 0.005 | 0.28 | 0.012 | 0.23 | 0.040 |
LnTrail_Making_A_1 | 0.52 | 0.000 | 0.31 | 0.002 | 0.35 | 0.000 | 0.33 | 0.001 | 0.35 | 0.000 | 0.34 | 0.001 |
Age | 0.37 | 0.000 | 0.28 | 0.015 | 0.19 | 0.073 | 0.29 | 0.011 | 0.32 | 0.006 | 0.31 | 0.009 |
F = 9.6, | F = 8.8, | F = 8.9, | F = 9.3, | F = 9.1, | ||||||||
p = 0.000, | p = 0.000, | p = 0.000, | p = 0.000, | p = 0.000, | ||||||||
Adjusted | Adjusted | Adjusted | Adjusted | Adjusted | ||||||||
R2 = 0.44 | R2 = 0.46 | R2 = 0.50 | R2 = 0.48 | R2 = 0.47 |
*Ln, natural logarithm; _1, baseline; _2, end of study; NS, not significant. #Adjusted for LnCys_1 and sex. ∧ Fe and Si were not significant when present in models together. $Model with LnBrain Volume_1. Note: Trail_Making_A_2 score indicates worse cognitive performance.