Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 15;2021(12):CD008012. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008012.pub4

Freeman 1986.

Study characteristics
Methods RCT design: 2‐arm parallel‐group trial
Total N randomised: 107
Length of follow‐up: no follow‐up
Analysis: per‐protocol (60 of 107 participants completed the trial)
Participants Location: USA
Number of study centres and setting: patients from 1 hospital
CAD criteria: patients undergoing CABG (assessment method and time to randomisation not specified)
Depression criteria: a score of 13 or greater on the Center for Epidemiological Studies ‐ Depression Scale (CES‐D) or a score of 36 or greater on the Spielberger State Anxiety Inventory (SSAI), or both; presence of clinically significant anxiety or depression was confirmed by a semistructured psychiatric interview
Other entry criteria: under 65 years of age
Exclusion criteria: females of childbearing potential, patients with a history of sensitivity to benzodiazepines, patients with prior or existing evidence of substance abuse, antisocial personality, psychosis, significant uncontrolled systemic disease, cerebral infarction, dementia, or insufficient English
Treatment N: 32 (sex and age distribution unclear)
Control N: 28 (sex and age distribution unclear)
Comparability of groups: treatment group had significantly higher anxiety scores at baseline; no further information regarding group comparability
Interventions Treatment: alprazolam (tablets, 2.5 mg/d at bedtime, maximum dose 4.5 mg/d)
Control: placebo
Duration of treatment: 1 month
Outcomes Review outcomes: depression symptoms (CES‐D score, also Zung Self‐Rating Depression Scale)
Other outcomes: anxiety symptoms (SSAI, Zung Self‐Rating Anxiety Scale), Global Impression Scale, structured psychiatric semistructured interviews (signs and symptoms of psychosis, cognitive dysfunction, depression, anxiety, and somatisation)
Funding Upjohn Company
Notes Mixed study sample (participants with depression and/or anxiety)
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Comment: No details reported
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Comment: No details reported
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk Comment: No details reported
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk Comment: No details reported
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes High risk Comment: Only 60 of 107 patients completed the trial
Comment: 22 early drop‐outs in the alprazolam group (with noncompleters being less distressed than completers preoperatively)
Comment: 25 early drop‐outs in the placebo group (with noncompleters being more distressed than completers preoperatively)
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Comment: No protocol or design paper available
Comment: psychiatric semistructured interviews were performed at all assessment time points (signs and symptoms of psychosis, cognitive dysfunction, depression, anxiety, and somatization) but were not reported
Other bias Unclear risk Comment: unclear if selection bias present. 60% of 459 patients met entrance criteria and 23% were included. "The remainder were excluded from entering the drug trial by semistructured interview or were rendered ineligible because of surgical complications or withdrawal of consent." (p. 39)
Comment: possible baseline imbalance. Treatment group significantly higher anxiety scores at baseline; no further information regarding comparability of groups