Table 3. Explanatory Sequential Joint Display: A Summary of Quantitative and Qualitative Findings and Mixed Methods Meta-Inferences in an Evaluation of a Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support Intervention in Rural Guatemala, 2018–2020.
| RE-AIM Dimension | Quantitative Findings | Qualitative Findings | Meta-Inferences |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reach | • 16% of participants were men, while approximately 50% of people with diabetes in the population were men • Participants had worse HbA1c and blood pressure compared with overall diabetes population |
Barriers to enrollment of men: • Prioritization of work • Culture of machismo • DSMES not perceived as beneficial • Desire to received something of material value for time (also found for women) |
Future DSMES interventions may have trouble reaching total diabetes population without • Prioritizing at-work men • Addressing the culture of machismo • Integrating education more clearly within the broader structures of clinical diabetes care |
| Effectiveness | Improvements in clinical and psychometric outcomes: • HbA1c, blood pressure • Diabetes knowledge, diabetes distress, self-care activities |
Principal mechanisms that led to effectiveness: • Personalized nature of study visits • Cultural and linguistic acceptability • Family and community support |
DSMES programs benefit from: • Patient-centered care • Family and community inclusion |
| Adoption | • Most (95%) participants were recruited from health centers or by Wuqu’ Kawoq staff and programs • All health facilities that were approached agreed to participate, although few patients were referred |
• Intervention was only partially adopted by health centers • Pre-intervention trainings may help increase health facility involvement |
• Public and private health facilities were willing to participate in the DSMES program • Minimal participation in settings without direct involvement of study staff • Special attention to integrating health facilities may be necessary |
| Implementation | Mean visit duration: • Home visits (71 min) • Telephone visits (41 min) |
• More difficult to implement telephone visits than home visits • Overall high levels of patient satisfaction with telephone visits |
Future interventions should carefully consider tradeoffs between at-home and telephone visits |
| Maintenance | Direct intervention costs were US$90.19 per participant | Both participants and health center staff expressed desire to continue the intervention | There is interest in sustaining DSMES from: • Patients • Health workers • Health facility leadership However, important financial and time constraints exist |
Abbreviations: DSMES, diabetes self-management education and support; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin A1c; RE-AIM, reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance.