Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 9;18:E100. doi: 10.5888/pcd18.210259

Table 3. Explanatory Sequential Joint Display: A Summary of Quantitative and Qualitative Findings and Mixed Methods Meta-Inferences in an Evaluation of a Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support Intervention in Rural Guatemala, 2018–2020.

RE-AIM Dimension Quantitative Findings Qualitative Findings Meta-Inferences
Reach • 16% of participants were men, while approximately 50% of people with diabetes in the population were men
• Participants had worse HbA1c and blood pressure compared with overall diabetes population
Barriers to enrollment of men:
• Prioritization of work
• Culture of machismo
• DSMES not perceived as beneficial
• Desire to received something of material value for time (also found for women)
Future DSMES interventions may have trouble reaching total diabetes population without
• Prioritizing at-work men
• Addressing the culture of machismo
• Integrating education more clearly within the broader structures of clinical diabetes care
Effectiveness Improvements in clinical and psychometric outcomes:
• HbA1c, blood pressure
• Diabetes knowledge, diabetes distress, self-care activities
Principal mechanisms that led to effectiveness:
• Personalized nature of study visits
• Cultural and linguistic acceptability
• Family and community support
DSMES programs benefit from:
• Patient-centered care
• Family and community inclusion
Adoption • Most (95%) participants were recruited from health centers or by Wuqu’ Kawoq staff and programs
• All health facilities that were approached agreed to participate, although few patients were referred
• Intervention was only partially adopted by health centers
• Pre-intervention trainings may help increase health facility involvement
• Public and private health facilities were willing to participate in the DSMES program
• Minimal participation in settings without direct involvement of study staff
• Special attention to integrating health facilities may be necessary
Implementation Mean visit duration:
• Home visits (71 min)
• Telephone visits (41 min)
• More difficult to implement telephone visits than home visits
• Overall high levels of patient satisfaction with telephone visits
Future interventions should carefully consider tradeoffs between at-home and telephone visits
Maintenance Direct intervention costs were US$90.19 per participant Both participants and health center staff expressed desire to continue the intervention There is interest in sustaining DSMES from:
• Patients
• Health workers
• Health facility leadership
However, important financial and time constraints exist

Abbreviations: DSMES, diabetes self-management education and support; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin A1c; RE-AIM, reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance.