Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 15;14:103. doi: 10.1186/s12284-021-00544-2

Table 2.

Integrated LTG QTLs after substitution mapping

QTL Donor code Chr Interval (cM) Length (cM) a* R2 (%)*
qLTG1 W14 1 123.1–139.8 16.7 − 0.17 ± 0.01 29.0 ± 0.6
qLTG2 W08, W09 2 102.7–132.9 30.2 0.11 ± 0.01 19.5 ± 0.8
qLTG3a W06 3 22.7–29.3 6.6 0.17 ± 0.01 33.0 ± 3.2
qLTG3b W17 3 108.6–125.0 16.4 − 0.10 ± 0.01 19.2 ± 5.8
qLTG4 W06 4 67.7–80.6 12.9 − 0.16 ± 0.03 28.5 ± 3.8
qLTG5 W01, W11 5 113.9–116.5 2.6 0.14 ± 0.01 28.4 ± 0.5
qLTG6 W23, W27 6 0.7–17.3 16.6 0.10 ± 0.07 19.5 ± 15.0
qLTG7a W06 7 18.5–28.5 10.0 − 0.22 ± 0.09 39.4 ± 3.7
qLTG7b W05 7 55.8–80.4 24.6 − 0.24 ± 0.08 39.9 ± 8.9
qLTG8a W06 8 36.5–43.0 6.5 0.15 ± 0.02 26.9 ± 4.4
qLTG8b W06 8 82.6–91.7 9.1 0.16 ± 0.01 31.0 ± 3.7
qLTG9 W27 9 48.0–65.1 17.1 − 0.21 ± 0.01 34.2 ± 6.0
qLTG11a W06 11 39.8–59.3 19.5 0.15 ± 0.01 31.3 ± 1.3
qLTG11b W17 11 81.9–97.3 15.4 − 0.19 ± 0.07 34.1 ± 9.7

*a = average additive effect of the QTL from different SSSLs; R2 (%) = average additive effect contribution (%) of the QTL from different SSSLs