Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Drug Discov Today Technol. 2021 Jul 9;39:49–56. doi: 10.1016/j.ddtec.2021.06.006

Table 1.

DIA quantitative proteomics of DMEs and drug transporters.

Proteins of interest Sample Method features Normalization method Major findings and implications Ref.
CYPs HLM Label-free; relative quantification; multiplex Normalized to β-galactosidase tryptic peptides The protein abundance correlated better with enzyme activity than mRNA for most CYPs. [24]
CYPs HLM and microsomes of HepG2, Hep3B, and Huh7 cells Label-free; relative quantification; multiplex Normalized to the internal standard bovine serum albumin The results measured by DIA were highly correlated with those obtained with PRM (r2=0.87–0.90). The expression levels of most DMEs in the hepatic cell lines were lower than those in human liver tissues. [15]
CESs, UGTs, CYPs HLS9 Label-free; absolute quantification; multiplex Total protein in the sample Broader coverage than DDA-TPA; the results were comparable to those obtained from labeling and targeted methods. [16]
DMEs, transporters HLM, HLS9 The differences in the protein concentrations of DMEs and transporters between HLM and HLS9 were profiled. [26]
DMEs, transporters HLM, HIM, HKM Labeling; absolute quantification; large-scale multiplex Stable isotope-labeled internal standard peptides DIA was capable of multiplex quantifying proteins with accuracy comparable to targeted methods. [17]
Uptake transporters Human hepatic membrane proteins extraction Total protein in the sample The quantification results obtained with the DIA method was consistent with the measurements from a targeted method and data from the literature. [18]
DMEs, transporters Mice liver and kidney fractions Label-free and relative quantification for DIA; Labeling and absolute quantification for PRM Stable isotope-labeled internal standard peptides for PRM Two rounds of proteomics analysis: a DIA study for identifying proteins that differentially expressed between the control and the model groups; a PRM study for quantifying the expression changes of proteins identified by the DIA analysis. [23]

HLM: Human liver microsomes; HIM: Human intestine microsomes; HKM: Human kidney microsomes; HLS9: Human liver S9 fractions; CYP: cytochrome P450; UGT: uridine-diphosphate glucuronosyl transferase; TPA: total protein approach; MRM: multiple reaction monitoring; SRM: selected reaction monitoring; DIA: data independent acquisition; PRM: parallel reaction monitoring.