Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 2;16:e46. doi: 10.15420/ecr.2021.15

Table 1: Invasive and Non-invasive Testing Approaches to Diagnose Microvascular Angina.

Advantages Disadvantages
Non-invasive Testing
Transthoracic Doppler, contrast echocardiography
  • Easy to perform

  • Minimal risk

  • No radiation

  • Relatively inexpensive

  • Operator-dependent

  • Difficult imaging and poor image quality

  • Limited validation and poor correlation with PET

Cardiac PET
  • The most validated non-invasive tool to diagnose CMD

  • Carries a prognostication value

  • Accurate perfusion quantification

  • Less likely to be affected by renal function

  • Adding CT can allow anatomic assessment of the coronary arteries

  • Not haematocrit-dependent

  • Standard post-processing

  • Radiation exposure

  • Expensive

  • Not widely available

  • Less spatial and temporal resolution compared to CT and CMR

CMR
  • Validated against invasive measurements and cardiac PET

  • Myocardial perfusion semi-quantification

  • No radiation exposure

  • Excellent spatial and temporal resolution

  • Allows tissue characterisation with the same study

  • Expensive

  • Limited prognostication data

  • Complex post processing

  • Not widely available

  • Requires frequent breath holds and longer exam duration

  • Haematocrit-dependent

  • Limited in patients with MRI non-compatible devices

  • Limited in renal failure

Cardiac CT
  • Anatomic coronary data and perfusion data can be obtained in the same study

  • Good spatial and temporal resolution compared to cardiac PET

  • High radiation exposure

  • Higher risk for contrast-induced nephropathy

  • Limited in renal failure

  • Post-processing is complex

  • Haematocrit-dependent

  • Limited validation in patients with MVA

  • Iodinated contrast can cause coronary vasodilation and overestimate myocardial perfusion

Invasive Testing
Coronary function test
  • Confirmatory test to diagnose CMD

  • Accurately identifies different pathways contributing to MVA including CFR, CBF and coronary artery diameter change

  • Provides assessment of other haemodynamic measures such as LVEDP and assesses degree of coronary artery stenosis

  • Carries a prognostication value

  • Standardised protocol

  • Radiation exposure

  • Not widely available

  • Risk of contrast-induced nephropathy in patients with renal failure

  • Requires complex preparation and hospitalisation

CBF = coronary blood flow; CFR = coronary flow reserve; CMD = coronary microvascular dysfunction; CMR = cardiac magnetic resonance; LVEDP = left ventricular end diastolic pressure; MVA = microvascular angina.