Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 29;2016(6):CD006837. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006837.pub3

Dubois 1999.

Methods Randomization and treatment allocation method: not stated
Blinding of outcome assessment: no
Blinding of participants: no
Study period: not stated
Participants Number: 65 enrolled
Inclusion criteria: children 2 to 10 years of age, ASA physical status I to II, scheduled for tonsillectomy, entered the study
Exclusion criteria: not stated
Interventions All groups received 0.3 mg/kg midazolam rectally
Anaesthesia was induced by face mask and open circuit without carbon dioxide absorber according to
Group 1: 2%, 4%, 6%, 7% sevoflurane in 100% O2
Group 2: 7% sevoflurane in 100% O2
Group 3: 7% sevoflurane in 50% N2O and 50% O2
Outcomes Quality of mask acceptance
Degree of airway obstruction during induction
Quality of tracheal intubation
Time to loss of eyelash reflex
Time to obtain central pupils
Time to intubation
Adverse events (coughing, apnoea, laryngospasm, bronchospasm, secretions, vomiting, dysrhythmia, agitation and oxygen desaturation < 95%)
End‐tidal gas concentration
Systolic and diastolic arterial pressure, heart rate, oxygen saturation
Notes Location: France
Setting: operating room
Source of funding: not stated
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Information insufficient to permit judgement
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Information insufficient to permit judgement
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Quote: "trainee was in charge of recording induction events and monitoring parameters"
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk No missing data
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Study authors reported all planned outcomes