Abstract
Many industrial processes experience the advantages of enzymes which evolved the demand for enzymatic technologies. The enzyme immobilisation technology using different carriers has trustworthy applications in industrial biotechnology as these techniques encompass varied advantages such as enhanced stability, activity along with reusability. Immobilisation onto nanomaterial is highly favourable as it includes almost all aspects of science. Among the various techniques of immobilisation, the uses of nanoparticles are remarkably well perceived as these possess high‐specific surface area leading to high enzyme loadings. The magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) are burgeoning in the field of immobilisation as it possess some of the unique properties such as high surface area to volume ratio, uniform particle size, biocompatibility and particularly the recovery of enzymes with the application of an external magnetic field. Immobilisation of industrially important enzymes onto nanoparticles offers overall combined benefits. In this review, the authors here focus on the current scenario in synthesis and functionalisation of MNPs which makes it more compatible for the enzyme immobilisation and its application in the biotechnological industries.
Inspec keywords: magnetic particles, nanoparticles, enzymes, biotechnology, magnetic fields
Other keywords: magnetic nanoparticles, bioprocessing sector, industrial process, enzymatic technologies, enzyme immobilisation technology, industrial biotechnology, nanomaterial, high‐specific surface area, MNP, enzyme recovery, external magnetic field application, biotechnological industries
1 Introduction
The biotransformation reactions catalysed by the enzymes; the most versatile catalyst in living systems have been used in diverse bioprocess applications largely due to their ability to catalyse the reactions under very mild conditions with a varying degree of substrate specificity. The recovery, reuse, and stability of the enzymes play a vital role for large‐scale applications besides having excellent catalytic properties [1]. The problem of enzyme in making any biocatalysts can be easily solved by their immobilising them [2]. Several approaches including chemical re‐engineering [3], genetic modification of proteins [4], and site‐directed mutagenesis have been reported to improve the enzyme properties [5, 6]. The immobilisation of enzymes onto the solid support improves the stability and recovery which greatly reduces the cost of the process ultimately [7]. The enzyme and the support material have on direct impact on the properties of immobilised enzyme, and their interaction influences the specific chemical, biochemical, and kinetic properties [8].
The conventional immobilisation processes such as covalent and ionic binding, adsorption, entrapment, and encapsulation and offers several disadvantages like poor mass transfer limitation of the reactants, poor dispersibility of the products, limited loading capacity, and minimal recovery of the active enzyme fractions [9]. The advent of nanotechnology and its application in the field of biotechnology has drawn greater attention during the past few decades [10]. The nanobiotechnology involves engineering, construction fabrication, and manipulation of molecules in the 1–10 nm range different approaches for the benefit of biological systems. The enzymes have been immobilised using nanoparticles, encapsulated into hyper branched polymers/dendrimers, and single enzyme nanoparticles [11, 12, 13, 14]. Here in this review we focus on the different methods available for the synthesis and functionalisation techniques involved during the preparation of MNPs which makes it more suitable for the enzyme immobilisation. The application of MNPs for the enhanced the enzymes activity and their applications in the bioprocess industries have been discussed.
1.1 Importance of enzymes and their role in industries
Enzymes have been used since ancient time's traditional biotechnological approaches indirectly yeasts and bacteria for the manufacture of cheese, beer, wine, and vinegar [15]. The isolated‐free enzyme laid its first application in the year 1914 and their proteinaceous nature was proved in 1926 followed by their large‐scale production using microbes in 1960s. Due to the advancement in production technologies, properties of engineered enzyme and their application in various fields have led to the steady growth of industrial enzyme sector. The global market of these industrial enzymes is increasing constantly and it is now worth >2 billion dollars per annum. The production of these enzymes has been improved by the application of biotechnology [16]. The enzyme catalysis is extensively used in pharmaceutical, textile, food, and beverage industries. The versatility of enzymes has attracted more researchers in making benign industrial manufacturing processes [17]. Currently, the application of enzymes in analytical techniques as a biosensor is burgeoning in the field of medical sciences. Industrially produced enzymes are used in the leading industries such as detergents (17%), leather and paper (17%), textiles (8%), and pharmaceuticals (41%) [16, 18] as shown in Table 1.
Table 1.
Applications of various industrially important enzymes
| Industries | Enzymes employed | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| enzymes for detergency and personal care | proteases, carboxypeptidases amylases, lactases, sucrases maltases, lipases |
modification of starch, tissue and fibre stickies and pitch control, removal of stains deinking, drainage improvement |
| textile | alkaline pectinase, cellulases catalases, proteases, lipases | bio scouring of cotton, bio blasting of cotton fabric, treatment and processing of silk and wool |
| paper and pulp industry | amylases, xylanases, cellulases, lipases, esterases | bleaching of paper pulp |
| pharmaceutical | nitrite hydrolase, penicillin G acylase, thermolysin, lipase | organic synthesis of pharmaceutical proteins |
| food |
glucoamylase glucose oxidase, lipase, lipoxygenase |
fruit juice processing, wine making, enhancement of flavours, processing of sugar, production of sweeteners, production of glucose syrups, cheese ripening and increase in yield |
1.2 Enzyme immobilisation and stabilisation of enzymes
‘ Enzymes’ have its own excellent properties such as higher activity, selectivity and specificity. On comparison with the conventional catalysts, enzyme biocatalysts increase the reaction rate without affecting the reaction thermodynamics. Thus, by the use of these properties, the most complex chemical processes may be performed under favourable environmental conditions. However, most of these enzymes are relatively unstable in spite of the production and purification of enzymes is still being expensive. The difficulty of using these enzymes efficiently lies in the recovery of active enzyme and reuse of the enzymes greatly reduces the cost of the enzymes [1, 19]. Moreover, the application of enzymes as biocatalysts has not yet reached a significant level due to their high costs, poor recovery, reusability, less stability over extended pH and temperature, substrate and product inhibition nature [20, 21, 22, 23]. In addition, when compared with the conventional heterogeneous catalysis, the enzyme catalysis is performed under homogeneous conditions. Thus, there is a chance for the enzyme to contaminate the product if it is not be recovered in the active form from the reaction mixtures for reuse. To overcome the above said technical difficulties, immobilisation is the most vibrant technique to increase the success possibilities [24]. An economical industrial process can be achieved by the efficient reutilising of the biocatalyst [2]. The immobilisation capacity and activity recovery are the two important criteria for an efficient immobilisation [25]. Different approaches have been proposed to overcome the limitations conferred by the free enzymes, including chemical re‐engineering [3], genetic modification of proteins [4], and site‐directed mutagenesis which have been reported to improve the enzyme properties [5, 6]. The enzyme immobilisation is considered to be the most successful method to improve the enzyme properties [26, 27, 28]. By means of immobilisation, enzymes are retained either on the surface or on the support matrix [29].
Through immobilisation we can form the heterogeneous enzyme catalyst system by binding with or within the solid supports. Any suitable method should consider the following factors for enzyme immobilisation such as enzyme topology, active site orientation, reaction medium compatibility, operational cost and stability as shown in Fig. 1. The enzyme immobilisation onto the insoluble organic or inorganic carriers has become a vital area in enzyme technology [21]. The immobilisation of enzymes on a matrix is the most frequently used method for the improvement of enzyme activity [7]. The immobilised enzymes are those which are physically confined or localised in a certain defined region of space with retention to their catalytic activities and which can also be recycled efficiently. The most important attribute of an immobilised enzyme is to finally reduce the cost of the process especially for large‐scale applications. The properties of an immobilised enzyme are governed by both the enzyme and the support material used for the immobilisation and this interaction provides specific chemical, biochemical, and kinetic properties [8].
Fig. 1.

Factors considered for the successful immobilisation of enzymes on to support
Several methods have been successfully used for the production of immobilised enzymes as shown in Fig. 2. This may be broadly classified as physical method (weak interactions exist between the support and the enzyme) and chemical method (covalent bonds are formed with the enzyme). Basically, there are four principle techniques for the enzyme immobilisation such as covalent binding, entrapment, and adsorption cross‐linking [9]. Among all the techniques, the industrial applications of biocatalysts are highly supported by the covalent binding [30].
Fig. 2.

Depiction of different methods of immobilisation
(a) Covalent binding, (b) Entrapment, (c) Encapsulation, (d) Adsorption, (e) Ionic binding, (f) Affinity binding, (g) Metal ion binding, E ‐enzyme M‐metal
1.3 Enzyme immobilisation using nanomaterials
The use of nanomaterials as a carrier for enzyme immobilisation has received more attention during the recent years, because of its large specific surface area offering higher enzyme‐loading capacity [31], decreased mass transfer resistance, and increased mechanical resistance [32]. The enzymes have been immobilised using different matrices, encapsulated into hyper branched polymers/dendrimers and single enzyme nanoparticles [11]. The recent review by Ge et al. [3] describes well about the enhancement of enzyme stabilisation by fabricating the nanobiocatalyst using recently developed methods. To meet the advantages, the different nanoparticles have been reported by several researchers for the bioprocess applications such as gold [33, 34, 35], alumina [36], silica [37, 38], cadmium sulphide [39], iron oxide [40, 41].
Crespilho et al. [42] developed a strategy for enzyme immobilisation on layer‐by‐layer dendrimer‐gold nanoparticle electrocatalytic membrane‐incorporating redox mediator to produce nanostructured electrocatalytic membranes using a combination of the three methods. The layer‐by‐layer technique employs poly vinylsulfonic acid layers on indium tin oxide electrodes which were used alternatively for the poly amidoamine dendrimers with cobalt hexacyanoferrates‐modified gold nanoparticles. The film is then used for the immobilisation of glucose oxidase using glutaraldehyde as the cross‐linker and used for biosensing applications. Glucose oxidase monolayer was covalently immobilised on the surface of gold nanoparticles for the fabrication of bio‐conjugate complex. The bio‐conjugates of glucose oxidase/gold nanoparticles can be considered as catalytic nanodevices to construct nanoreactor based on glucose oxidation for the biotechnological purposes. The immobilisation of glucose oxidase onto gold nanoparticles which had better thermostability [43]. Bai et al. [44] developed a glucose biosensor by the immobilisation of IO4 − ‐oxidised‐glucose oxidase on gold nanoparticles‐mesoporus silica composite modified gold electrode with 2‐aminoethanethiol as a cross‐linker. The biosensor exhibited faster response time of <7 s with high sensitivity and conductivity. A novel approach of fabricating gold nanowire for the immobilisation in biosensor applications have also been studied [45]. The gold nanowires were used to immobilise glucose oxidase and the detection of glucose was performed with phosphate buffer and exhibited short response time of 8 s.
Crespilho et al. [46] defined a simple strategy to obtain an efficient bio‐electrochemical enzymatic device in which urease was immobilised on indium tin oxide electrodes. In this, the electrodes were previously modified with an electro active nanostructured membrane containing polyaniline and silver nanoparticles stabilised by polyvinyl alcohol. Chen et al. [47] grafted various carboxylic acids with different alkyl chain lengths on to zirconia nanoparticles for immobilising Pseudomonas cepacia lipase
Cruz et al. [48] described a wide range of surface coverage which allows the detection of optimum conditions for the preparations of immobilisates. It has also been discussed on the impact of structure modifiers on the conformational stability conditions and thereby on immobilisation of enzymes on fumed silica for organic catalysis. Liu et al. [49] reported the covalent attachment of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide to silica nanoparticles for multistep biotransformation. Moreover, silica nanoparticle‐attached glutamate dehydrogenase, lactate dehydrogenase and nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide were prepared and applied to catalyse the coupled reactions for production of α‐ketoglutarate and lactate. The use of nano particle‐attached cofactor promises a new biochemical processing strategy for cofactor‐dependent biotransformation.
1.4 MNPs as a versatile carrier for enzymes in bioprocess applications
In the past few decades, extensive research has been carried on MNPs and has drawn greater attention because of their unique properties. The use of MNPs for immobilisation is extensively studied which allows the easier recovery of the enzymes and retains their residual activity after many cycles. The MNPs are a class of engineered materials that can be manipulated under the influence of an external magnetic field. Also, among various nanoparticles, MNPs have been considered as suitable for immobilisation of enzyme due to their super‐paramagnetic behaviour and low toxicity [50]. Also, MNPs are not completely porous supports which have unique advantage of no external diffusion [51]. They display the property of super‐paramagnetism that offering the advantage of reducing the aggregation of particles. They possess diversified biological applications in the fields of medicine, detection of bacteria, immobilisation of enzymes, hyperthermia, and magnetic resonance imaging. The controlled size of MNPs and the ability to manipulate by an external magnetic field and their super‐paramagnetic properties makes them a valuable tool for many biomedical and biotechnological applications [52, 53, 54]. The enzyme immobilisation with MNPs is burgeoning in the field of enzyme technology [55, 56, 57] and has multifarious industrial applications. Cao et al. [58] elaborated the exploitation of enzyme immobilised the MNPs for the purification of proteins, analyse of food samples, and food engineering. The enhancement of the stability of the enzymes, possibility for modulation of catalytic activity of the enzymes, lower mass transfer resistance, higher enzyme‐loading capacity, and easier recovery of the enzymes with the application of an external magnetic field are some of the excellent features provided by the MNPs when compared with the traditional methods of immobilisation. Koneracká et al. [59] immobilised several clinically significant proteins and enzymes onto MNPs and the immobilised MNPs with the enzymes exhibited no modification or loss in the enzyme activities.
Several materials have been reported for the synthesis of MNPs including cobalt, iron, and nickel. Among these materials, iron oxide including maghemite (γ ‐Fe2 O3) and magnetite (Fe3 O4) nanoparticles are promising for their biocompatibilities, low cost, as well as relatively simple synthetic procedures compared with other magnetic materials. Conventionally, the synthesis of MNPs could be classified into five categories: (i) co‐precipitation, (ii) micro‐emulsion, (iii) thermal decomposition, (iv) hydro thermal, and (v) sol–gel methods [60]. Since it is difficult to immobilise enzymes directly onto the MNPs, suitable functionalisations of MNPs are essential for extending them to suitable applications. Several approaches have been employed to modify these MNPs offering other advantages like protecting particle from undesired aggregation and increasing the stability of the particles more stable. The MNPs with small size possess unique features; like single domain limit, large surface area and enduing the particles with magnetic properties. For applications in bio‐related areas, especially in vivo, in vitro applications, biocompatible MNPs are favourable. which could help to maintain the original bimolecular features of the tissues, cells, and proteins [61, 62].
MNPs are more prefered support matrices for enzymes rendering many advantages such as (i) increased enzyme‐loading capacity and (ii) biocompatibility. The super‐paramagnetic properties enable easier and faster recovery of the enzymes by the application of the external magnetic field thus making the process simpler, inexpensive, and enhanced purity [63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75].
Immobilisation of pectinase was carried out in MNPs and surface‐modified MNPs [13, 14, 76], the comparative study of kinetic parameters revealed that MNPs were the best support for pectinase immobilisation. On comparing various supports (Con A‐Seralose 4B, Alginate beads, Chitosan tethered silica, Composite membranes, Amphiphilic PS‐b‐PAA diblock Copolymers, Silica‐coated chitosan particles), lower K m and higher V max was achieved for the MNPs. It was evident that the increase in V max due to negligible steric hindrance and less diffusional resistance. The decrease in K m value was due to greater affinity of immobilised pectinase to pectin. The synthesised MNPs were extended for real applications such as clarification of Malus domestica juice [14] and enhanced degradation of a textile recalcitrant [76].
1.5 Synthesis and functionalisation of MNPs
Diverse methods have been constantly reported by the researchers for the synthesis of MNPs involving various phases. In general, the physicochemical characteristics of any nanoparticle such as size, dispersity, crystal structure, and morphology are greatly influenced by the mode of synthesis involved [77]. The MNPs produced by the materials in either gas or solid phase with high‐energy requirement are referred to as physical methods (chemical vapour deposition, arc discharge, and annealing) and the synthesis of particles in solution under moderate temperatures are called chemical methods co‐precipitation, thermal decomposition, micro‐emulsion, and hydrothermal synthesis [78, 79].
Chemical vapour deposition is based on the addition of the precursors for layer deposition in the gaseous phase. The layer composition is determined by the parameters of the activating plasma and most notably, the types and the proportions of the gases. The desirable size and morphology of the nanopowders can be achieved by the heat treatment with high purity gas streams [80, 81].
Arc vaporisation works on the principle of gas phase synthesis in which a metal precursor is packed inside a graphite electrode [82, 83, 84]. In this method, the examination of size‐dependent properties of MNPs enabled natural separation at different depths of water [85]. This is not a convenient method for handling large quantities of nanoparticles for coating. Annealing is the solid‐phase synthesis which employs heating at low temperatures to yield. Nanoparticles with the size of 8 nm embedded on amorphous carbon matrix [86].
Micro‐emulsion is a chemical method employing the dispersion of two immiscible liquids under thermodynamically stable isotropic conditions. One or more liquids which consist of nanosized domains are stabilised by interfacial film phenomena using surface‐active compounds [87]. This method is used to synthesise the uniform‐sized MNPs with narrow size distribution. The micro‐emulsion can be prepared as either water‐in‐oil or oil‐in‐water based on which it forms the continuous and dispersed phase. The water‐in‐oil formulation is predominantly used for the synthesis of many nanoparticles and is prepared by mixing water and oil with an amphiphilic surfactant. Some compounds such as Triton X‐100, Igepal CO‐520 and Brij‐97 were also used for the preparation of micro‐emulsions with the base source of ammonium hydroxide, sodium hydroxide and with some added solvents such as acetone and ethanol [88, 89, 90, 91, 92].
By the thermal decomposition method, the MNPs with uniform particle size distribution are synthesised successfully by thermal decomposition method. The precursors include diverse metal‐containing compounds such as organo‐metallic compounds and are more preferable for the synthesis of MNPs. The precursors are allowed to decompose on heating to high temperature or UV irradiation, while the reagents ratios, time, and ageing have been considered to control the morphology and the size of the MNPs [45, 93].
The broad range hydrothermal principle of nanosized particles can be synthesised through. Here, the reaction is carried out in aqueous media under high pressure 2000 psi at 200°C. Recently, some other solvents are also employed for better performances. For instance, nickel ferrite nanoparticles were synthesised using ethylene glycol as a solvent. Continuous hydrothermal and microwave‐hydrothermal are the advanced methods through which specific size, rapid synthesis of MNPs are achieved under low temperature [94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100].
Chemical co‐precipitation method is an easy and convenient way to synthesise MNPs. The reaction is carried out with the aqueous ferrous (Fe2+) and ferric (Fe3+) salt solution by the addition of a base under inert atmosphere at the elevated temperature. The size distribution, shape, and composition depend on the type of salts used (e.g. chlorides, sulphates, and nitrates), ratio of Fe2+ /Fe3+, reaction temperature, pH value, and ionic strength of the media [45, 101, 102].
| (1) |
| (2) |
| (3) |
The details about the synthesis of MNPs through different methods and its analysis are shown in Table 2 [45]. In terms of simplicity in synthesis, co‐precipitation is widely preferred. Considering size and morphology control of the MNPs, thermal decomposition seems to be the best method developed till date. As an alternative, micro‐emulsions can also be used to synthesise mono‐dispersed nanoparticles with various morphologies. However, this method requires large quantities of solvent. Hydrothermal synthesis is relatively less explored method for the preparation of high‐quality MNPs. MNPs prepared from co‐precipitation and thermal decomposition are the best‐studied methods and can be prepared on a large scale. Thus, in order to prevent the above inconveniences, the MNPs are usually functionalised by coating the surface of the particles with the organic compounds [45].
Table 2.
Comparative summary of chemical methods for MNPs synthesis
| Name of synthesis | Reaction condition | Temperature, °C | Time period | Nature of solvent | Capping agents | Size distribution | Shape control | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| co‐precipitation | very simple, ambient conditions | 20–90 | min | water | needed, added during or after reaction | relatively narrow | not good | high/scalable |
| thermal decomposition | complicated, inert atmosphere | 100–320 | h–d | organic compound | needed, added during or after reaction | very narrow | very good | high/scalable |
| micro‐emulsion | complicated, ambient conditions | 20–50 | H | organic compound | needed, added during or after reaction | relatively narrow | good | low |
| hydrothermal synthesis | simple, high pressure | 220 | h–d | water‐ethanol | needed, added during or after reaction | very narrow | very good | medium |
The MNPs generally includes γ ‐Fe2 O3 and Fe3 O4 which are predominantly used for the biological applications as they are biocompatible, non‐toxic than the other MNPs. Although a variety of physical and chemical methods involving various phases have been employed for the synthesis of MNPs, the chemical co‐precipitation method is more advantageous in terms of simplicity and easier surface modification for the immobilisation of enzymes [103]. Hu et al. [104] synthesised six different kinds of ferrites, MeFe2 O4 (Me = Mn, Co, Cu, Mg, Zn, Ni) in nanoscale by co‐precipitation method and analysed for the adsorption–desorption of hexavalent chromium from synthetic wastewater. Furthermore, the effect of magnetic properties on the removal of hexavalent chromium was investigated. A new method for the synthesis of environmental friendly MNPs by ultrasonic chemical co‐precipitation is described by Wu et al. [105]. The resultant nanoparticles were in the range of 15 nm and exhibited super‐paramagnetic effect and hence it can be used for biological applications.
2 Surface modification of MNPs
The surface properties of the synthesised naked MNPs are a major obstacle which greatly influences the amount of immobilised enzymes. The naked MNPs possess hydrophobic surfaces with large surface area lead to the agglomeration and finally results in the formation of clusters. This hinders the enzyme immobilisation and their catalytic activities [106]. The agglomeration of MNPs also has an influence in the loss of super‐paramagnetic behaviour and in the trigger of opsonisation process [107]. Hence, in order to functionalise and modify the porous surface of the MNPs, surface coating and functionalisation of MNPs have been carried out using the compounds such as aminosilanes, chitosan, and carbodiimide. The functionalisation governs the stability, particle size control, and ideal immobilisation of the enzyme over the surface of the MNPs [108, 109, 110]. In situ synthesis methods [111] are present which skips the separate step of functionalisation. However, it is also to be noted that in situ methods produce functionalised nanoparticles of uncontrollable less purity though prepared in a single step.
The enzymes were bound to the matrix through various methods such as surface adsorption, covalent binding, cross‐linking with bifunctional agents such as glutaraldehyde or inclusion in gel phase or encapsulation. When the enzymes bound on to the material's surface, the interaction between them plays a significant role to have a stable and active immobilised enzyme. The nature and linkage between the enzymes and the support matrix are the important factors contributing to the loss of enzyme activity. Hence, many researchers have reported constantly to improve the current state of the art of immobilised systems [112].
The success of immobilisation lies in the availability of diverse functional groups provided by the support material for the attachment of enzymes. The surface of the MNPs is modified to acquire various functional groups for the enzyme immobilisation. This includes several methodologies, of which silanisation, coating with polymers such as chitosan and carbodiimide activation are more popular [113]. Immobilisation of enzyme is also influenced by the porous nature of the MNPs. The porous carriers can support high enzyme loading but it also has high steric hindrances reducing the activity of the immobilised enzyme, whereas the non‐porous carriers involve low enzyme loading but increased activity can be achieved because of less steric hindrances [13, 14].
2.1 Aminosilane coating
The chemical surface modification of MNPs results from the formation of covalent bond that occurs as a result of the reaction of one functional group with another. Some of the compounds form active intermediates with other functional groups rather than being cross‐linked or modified compounds [114, 115]. A second molecule that contains the correct chemical constituent is subsequently coupled with the active ingredient to allow the bond formation to occur. 3‐Aminopropyl triethoxysilane (APTES) is one of such intermediates involved in the surface modification of MNPs. The coating of these silane‐coupling agents on the surface of MNPs offers the high density of functional groups and makes the operation simple [105]. The functional groups designed for specific tasks are anchored as an organic molecule such as APTES as a core shell nanoparticle [116].
Silanes have the general chemical formula as Y–(CH2) n –Si–R3, with Y representing the head group functionality, (CH2) n an alkane chain, and Si–R3 the anchor group by which the silane will be grafted to the oxide surface are bifunctional molecules. The amino group is usually preferred for the binding of different biological groups and this is efficiently provided by the APTES when it is used as the coating material. It is used for the loading of drugs for targeted drug delivery [117]. Recent reports reveal the capability of the aminosilane‐coated MNPs to immobilise the recombinant bacterial enzymes covalently [118].
The hydroxyl groups present on the synthesised MNPs attacks and displaces the ethoxy group (–OC2 H5) on APTES and forms a covalent (–Si–O–) bond. This silanisation covers the surface of the MNPs with the functional amino group (–NH2) forming AMNPS and thus making them available for immobilisation with pectinase [12]. Further, the glutaraldehyde and AMNPs undergoes dehydration to form activated AMNPs, i.e. the reaction between the aldehyde group (–CHO) of glutaraldehyde and the exposed terminal amino group in the functionalised AMNPs. In a similar way, covalent bond is formed between the amino and aldehyde groups of enzyme and glutaraldehyde, respectively, and the mechanisms are shown in Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.

Schematic representation of enzyme immobilisation onto carboxyl group activated AMNPs
2.2 Chitosan coating of MNPs
Chitosan is a cationic polysaccharide formed by the deacetylation of the naturally occurring chitin. Chitin is an unelastic and nitrogenated polysaccharide, found on the walls of the fungi and outer skeleton of arthropodes such as insects, crustaceans and beetles. The natural presence of amino groups in chitosan makes it a cationic polyelectrolyte (pK a ∼6.5) [119, 120]. The chitosan‐based materials have been successfully employed for enzyme immobilisation. They exist in the form of beads, spheres, or membranes because of their high biological activity, antimicrobial property and stability [66, 121]. Due to the strong magnetic dipole–dipole attractions between particles, the MNPs tend to aggregate in liquid media, modify, and increase their stability. Some biocompatible and biodegradable polymers with specific functional groups have been used as stabilisers. Chitosan, known as 2‐amino‐2‐deoxy‐(1 → 4)‐β ‐d ‐glucopyranan, is one of the most widely distributed biopolymers. Moreover, chitosan is a cationic, non‐toxic, biodegradable, and biocompatible polyelectrolyte. Hence, it has been extensively used in the food, cosmetics, pharmaceutical and biotechnological fields for potential applications [115, 122]. Chitosan is considered to be an ideal support material for enzyme immobilisation because of its varied characteristics such as improved mechanical strength potential anti microbial activity, resistance to chemical degradation, reduced interaction between the metal ions and the enzyme [110, 123]. The magnetic carrier is more significant for the preparation of immobilised enzymes and chitosan. Chitosan can be used as a base material for magnetic carriers as it provides the functional groups for the attachment of MNPs.
Biro et al. [124] synthesised macro, micro, and nanosized chitosan particles by different routes and used for the immobilisation of β‐galactosidase that recorded the highest activity with the nanoparticles and exhibited excellent storage stability with macro and micro spheres. The native chitosan membranes and the membranes cross‐linked with glutaraldehyde were also investigated for the immobilisation of lipase. These supports were characterised for the presence of enzymes and have shown lesser enzyme loaded on the membrane compared with the enzyme added [125]. The chitosan nanoparticles prepared by micro‐emulsion using 2.0% acetic acid and 30% tri‐n ‐octylamine as a solvent and precipitant, respectively, yielded 7 nm sized particles with156 mg/g enzyme‐loading capacity. The immobilised lipase was also able to retain 91% activity after five cycles [126]. Hence, the chitosan was also used as the reducing agent for the synthesis of nanoparticles and it also serves as the surface capping agent. The chitosan is used for the MNPs stabilisation to form a hybrid nanocomposite with excellent hydrophilicity and biocompatibility.
Jiang et al. [127] reported the preparation of magnetic chitosan microspheres by reverse phase suspension methodology. Glutaraldehyde was used as a cross‐linking agent for the immobilisation of enzymes which resulted size distribution. The immobilised laccase exhibited its maximal activity at pH 3.with maximum Km and V max than those of free laccase. It also showed an improvement in stability to various parameters such as temperature, reuse, and storage time. A simple and efficient method for the preparation of Fe3 O4 ‐chitosan nanoparticles by co‐precipitation and immobilisation via glutaraldehyde cross‐linking was investigated for lipase immobilisation [128].
The laccase from Pycnoporous anguineus was immobilised on the microspheres by adsorption with glutaraldehyde showed an enhancement in the operational stability. Candida rugosa lipase was immobilised on Fe3 O4 ‐chitosan nanoparticles via carbodiimide activation in which the optimum conditions for the immobilisation and the factors involved in it were derived by response surface methodology [66, 129].
The mechanism of the enzyme attachment onto the chitosan‐coated MNPswere elucidated and the hydroxyl groups on the MNPs and chitosan reacts to form a hydrogen bond and is accompanied by the release of water molecule. The chitosan coat on the MNPs exposes the amino group (NH2) on the surface. This amino activated MNPs reacts with the aldehyde group (–CHO) of glutaraldehyde to form activated CMNPS. The other free aldehyde group in glutaraldehyde forms covalent bonds with amino group of pectinase and thereby immobilisation occurs which is represented in Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.

Schematic representation of enzyme immobilisation onto carboxyl group activated CMNPs
2.3 Silica coating of MNPs
Silica, a chemically inert material, is the most prominent substance for coating without affecting the redox reaction at the core surface. Thus, the silica's surface can easily be functionalised; making the nanoparticles adaptable to many applications. Moreover, the silica coating increases the chemical stability and prevents aggregation of MNPs [130]. The coating material does not disturb the redox reaction at the surface due to the selectivity on the chemical inertness. The schematic representation involved the fabrication of the nanobiocatalyst with the silica functionalised MNPs are shown in Fig. 5. Especially, in silica coating, the reaction between a silanol group and various coupling agents provides a covalent attachment with specific ligands no the surfaces of the MNPs [131]. The silica matrix also acts an anti‐sintering agent and stabilises the maghemite particles. The MNPs with the silica coating renders good stability against organic solvents, anti‐bacterial property, ease in separation and recovery. The aforementioned properties make the surface‐modified MNPs as an ideal carrier for enzyme immobilisation and they also exhibit excellent biocompatibility and hydrophilicity properties [110, 132].
Fig. 5.

Schematic representation of enzyme immobilisation onto carboxyl group activated Amino functionalised silica coated magnetic nanoparticles (ASMNPs)
Wang et al. [133] fabricated cuprous ion‐chelated mesoporous silica MNPs for the immobilisation of laccase where tetraethoxyorthosilicate (TEOS) as the silica source was employed and laccase was adsorbed onto the fabricated nanoparticles with 86.6% residual activity after ten successive cycles of reaction. APTES‐functionalised MNPs were used as the coupling agents for protease for digestion of rape seed meals using 1,4‐phenylenediisothiocyanate as the binding agent [134]. Wang et al. [135] studied the immobilisation of glucose oxidase on novel CoFe2 O4 /SiO2 nanoparticles via cross‐linking with glutaraldehyde. The mono‐dispersed CoFe2 O4 /SiO2 nanoparticles were prepared by a facile route and functionalised CoFe2 O4 /SiO2 nanoparticles with reactive amino groups were synthesised by one‐step method using precursors TEOS and APTES. The immobilised glucose oxidase retained 87% of its initial activity after 7 cycles with the Km value of 14.6 mM. [136]. The silane‐functionalised nanoparticles were used for the immobilisation of glucose oxidase with an enzyme‐loading capacity of 95 mg/g support and were reported to retain 98% activity after 45 d. More excitingly, the immobilised glucose oxidase showed stability at an elevated temperature of 80°C. Recently, the nanosized amine‐functionalised magnetite nanoparticles were synthesised using APTES as a precursor and was used to immobilise Mucor javonicus lipase using glutaraldehyde as a cross‐linking agent [137]. These nanosized magnetite nanoparticles conjugated with lipase were used to catalyse the solvent‐free synthesis of 1,3‐diacylglycerols from various fatty acids. A ten‐fold increase in specific activity and yield >90% has been achieved by using immobilised lipase [138].
3 Surface activation of MNPs for immobilisation of enzymes
3.1 Carbodiimide activation
Due to its simplicity and high efficiency, a method involving the binding through carbodiimide activation has increased in popularity. 1‐Ethyl‐3‐[3‐dimethylaminopropyl] carbodiimide hydrochloride (EDC) is a water‐soluble cross‐linking agent used to couple carboxyl groups to the primary amines. The formation of amine bonds is facilitated by the cross‐linker which activates the carboxyl groups for spontaneous reaction with primary amines (Fig. 6). The cross‐linking of the carbodiimide can be performed in physiological solutions without adding organic solvents as it is water soluble. However, the excess reagent and the cross‐linking by products can be easily removed by washing with water or dilute acids [139]. The coupling of enzymes onto MNPs through carbodiimide has been constantly reported by researchers for immobilising various enzymes due to its simplicity and high efficiency. Talbert and Goddard [112] utilised the carbodiimide chemistry for the covalent attachment of lactase onto carboxylic acid‐functionalised MNPs of 18 nm particle size. The conjugated enzyme showed excellent catalytic activity with Km 2.8 × 103 mol−1 s−1 compared with 2.5 × 103 mol−1 s−1 for free enzyme that also improved recycle efficiency. The immobilised enzyme retained 78% activity after five repeated cycles. Here the activation of the MNPs takes place in two stages. In the first stage, the carboxylic acid groups were modified to create an amino reactive intermediate followed by the addition of mercaptoethanol. It quenches the unreacted EDC that can lead to protein cross‐linking after the subsequent addition of the enzyme. In the second stage, the lactase was covalently conjugated to the nanoparticles through reactive amine groups associated with the enzyme.
Fig. 6.

Schematic representation of carbodiimide activation
The cellulase which has a significant role in ethanol industry has been covalently immobilised on Fe3 O4 via. carbodiimide chemistry to attain the maximum enzyme‐loading capacity and specific activity of 62 IU/mg. This maximum efficiency for enzyme‐to‐support binding was verified at low enzyme loading and the saturation point was confirmed at a weight ratio of 0.02. The immobilised cellulase has also shown a marginal increase in stability over a wider range of temperatures when compared with that of free enzyme and it was also capable of retaining residual activity after six cycles [140].
Sui et al. [141] demonstrated the use of gluconic acid‐functionalised super‐paramagnetic nanoparticles for lipase immobilisation by carbodiimide as the coupling agent. The immobilised enzyme showed an enhancement in the storage stability, pH, and thermal stability than the free lipase. This is mainly due to the carbodiimide which increased the binding efficiency of lipase. The lipase immobilised on MNPs revealed excellent storage stability after 1 month of storage [38]. Kouassi et al. [142] demonstrated the binding of cholesterol oxidase through carbodiimide and achieved 98% binding efficiency.
3.2 Glutaraldehyde activation
Glutaraldehyde is a highly versatile cross‐linking agent widely used in immobilisation (as shown in Figs. 3, 4, 5 [12, 13, 14, 143]). The intermolecular cross‐linking of enzymes by means of bifunctional or multifunctional reagents such as glutaraldehyde, bisadiazobenzidine, or hexamethylenediisocyanate plays a vital role in the immobilisation of enzymes to solid support: This is primarily based on the formation of bonds between enzymes and the matrix through covalent linkage. Using glutaraldehyde for activation enables the nanoparticles to obtain distinct number of reactive arms on the surface [144]. This interaction improves the uniformity, density, and distribution of the immobilised proteins and thereby confers the reproducibility of the surfaces. Ibrahim et al. [145] demonstrated the immobilisation of cyclodextrin glucano transferase from Amphibacillus sp., NPST‐10 onto aminopropyl‐functionalised silica‐coated super‐paramagnetic nanoparticles.
The glutaraldehyde is used along with the chitosan which is used for the functionalisation of MNPs. The amino group on the chitosan reacts with the carboxyl group of glutaraldehyde. Thus, the surface of the activated particles has the carboxyl group of glutaraldehyde. The linkage is formed due to the polymerisation of glutaraldehyde and a bifunctional reagent with several other functional groups and successfully used for the immobilisation of enzymes [146]. This is exceptionally stable at extreme pH and temperatures that facilitate the multipoint covalent attachment [147, 148, 149].
Glutaraldehyde was used for the activation of amino‐functionalised silica‐coated MNPs. The free amino group of amino‐functionalised silica‐coated MNPs reacts with the terminal aldehyde group of glutaraldehyde to form a Schiff base linkage and provides a free terminal aldehyde which can be then condensed with the free amino groups in the enzyme to form a second Schiff base [150, 151]. The increment in the glutaraldehyde concentration has shown a net significant increase of 94.5% in the enzyme binding efficiency with 5% glutaraldehyde. Li et al. [43] has reported a novel route for the immobilisation of trypsin with glutaraldehyde as the cross‐linking agent. In addition, glutaraldehyde extends its advantage in providing atleast five atom spaces between the enzyme and support which has great importance in catalysis [152]. The immobilisation is mediated by the interaction of the aldehyde groups of glutaraldehyde in functionalised MNPs with the amino groups of trypsin. The immobilised enzymes were conveniently applied for the hydrolysis of proteins and complete protein digestion has been achieved in short time (5 min).
3.3 Polymer‐encapsulated MNPs
The polymers are widely used in nanotechnology for the synthesis of organic and inorganic nanoparticles. The polymer‐assisted synthesis of nanoparticles is a very promising technology, as it considerably decreases the reaction temperature and effectively controls the particle size by preventing agglomeration. The polymers also provide a simple, eco‐friendly, cost‐effective process for the production of multifunctional nanoparticles.
Phillipova et al. [153] reviewed the use of magnetic polymer beads and their unique properties. Since the beads have high magnetic susceptibility to an external magnetic field, they can be easily separated from other components of the mixture with the help of magnets. Attachment of specific functional groups or ligands to the shell of beads can make the separation highly selective and hence it can be used in many biological applications. Yong et al. [154] prepared MNPs by the chemical co‐precipitation of Fe3+ and Fe2+ ionsand modified the nanoparticles directly by vinyltriethoxysilicane to introduce reactive groups onto the surface of the particles. Glycidyl methacrylate and methacryloxy ethyltrimethyl ammonium chloride, which were then grafted onto the modified nanoparticles by surface‐initiated radical polymerisation. The functionalised MNPs were used for immobilising lipase by electrostatic adsorption and covalent binding. The properties of the immobilised lipase, such as activity recovery, thermal stability, and reusability were investigated. Further, the applications of polymer‐grafted MNPs were used in the immobilisation of lipase. Brahim et al. [155] studied the kinetics of glucose oxidase immobilised in poly hydroxyl methyl methaacrylate‐hydrogel microspheres in a packed‐bed bioreactor. These hydrogel microspheres are pH responsive thereby influencing the action mechanism of immobilised enzymes. The results thus obtained were further analysed in the form of kinetic equations. Liao et al. [156] immobilised and synthesised a novel MNP functionalised with poly vinyl alcohol for the immobilisation of cellulase by micro‐emulsion technique. The immobilised enzyme is applied to improve the hydrolytic efficiency of microcrystalline cellulose combined with ball millingfor the degradation of cellulose.
4 Immobilisation of industrially important enzymes using MNPs
MNPs have been extensively synthesised and functionalised by different methods and are used for commercial applications in industries. The superparamagnetic particles conjugated with therapeutic enzymes have profound applications in the healthcare industries as diagnostic kits [157]. Table 3 summarises the application of different enzymes immobilised onto the MNPs with the kinetic parameters. The immobilisation of some of the useful enzymes onto the MNPs and its applications are discussed here.
Table 3.
Applications of MNPs for immobilisation of enzymes employed in various bioprocessing sectors
| Enzyme | Nanoparticles used | Kinetic parameters | Applications | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Food industry | ||||
| Mucor javonicus lipase | APTES‐glutaraldehyde‐modified MNPs prepared by chemical co‐precipitation method |
specific activity (U/mg protein) free enzyme: 0.133 immobilised enzyme:1.42 retained 90% activity after 10 cycles. |
conversion of fatty acids to diacyl‐glycerol | [152] |
| α –amylase | MNPs modified with gum Acacia as a steric stabiliser |
Km (µmol/mL/min) free enzyme: 3.4 immobilised enzyme: 5.3 retained 70% activity after 6 cycles |
hydrolysis of starch | [153] |
| lactase | carboxylic acid‐functionalised MNPs by carbodiimide chemistry using EDC and N ‐hydroxysuccimide as coupling agents |
K cat (mol−1 s−1) free enzyme: 2.8 × 103 immobilised enzyme: 2.5 × 103 retained 78% activity after 5 cycles |
analysis of lactose | [108] |
| pectinase | docusate sodium salt‐modified MNPs |
specific activity (U/mg protein) immobilised enzyme:1.98 retained 80% activity after 6 cycles |
hydrolysis of pectin | [154] |
| amyloglucosidase | cross‐linked enzyme‐aggregate MNPs | Km (µmol/min) Free enzyme: 0.148 immobilised enzyme: 0.141 | production of glucose | [155] |
| β ‐galactosidase | con A layered MNPs |
Km (mmol) free enzyme: 2.38 immobilised enzyme: 5.8 |
degradation of starch | [156] |
| porcine pancreatic lipase | sodium dodecyl sulphate‐capped MNPs synthesised by chemical co‐precipitation method |
specific activity (U/mg protein) free enzyme: 4.75 immobilised enzyme: 9.87 retained 90% activity after 5 cycles |
hydrolysis of oils (olive oil) | [157] |
| Chemical industries | ||||
| Thermomyces lanuginose lipase | Fe3 O4 /zinc oxide core shell nanoparticles prepared by chemical co‐precipitation method using APTES and TEOS |
retained 96% activity after 5 cycles no loss in activity after 15 d |
production of chalcone derivatives | [158] |
| GOD | MNPs by chemical co‐precipitation method |
Km (U/g) free enzyme: 640 immobilised enzyme: 780 retained 86% activity after 30 cycles |
deoxygenation of water | [102] |
| GOD | amino‐modified silica‐encapsulated MNPs by microencapsulation method |
Km (mmol) free enzyme: 4.8 × 10−2 immobilised enzyme: 1.6 × 10−1 retained 90% activity after 12 cycles |
production of quinonenmine dye | [132] |
| Candida rugosa lipase | chitosan/MNPs prepared by chemical co‐precipitation methods using EDC and N ‐hydroxysuccimide as coupling agents |
specific activity (U/g protein) immobilised enzyme: 19.96 |
hydrolysis of p–nitrophenylpalmitate | [125] |
| Pharmaceutical industry | ||||
| Candida rugosa lipase | chitosan‐capped MNPs by carbodiimide activation by coupling with EDC | 78% activity retained after five cycles | kinetic resolution of Ibuprofen | [51] |
| penicillin G acylase | silica‐coated MNPs functionalised by ionic liquids containing ethyoxyl groups |
specific activity (U/g protein) immobilised enzyme: 261 retained 62% activity after 10 cycles |
production of β ‐lactam antibiotics | [159] |
| Sensor applications | ||||
| GOD | single enzyme MNPs functionalised with poly (pyrrole N ‐sulphonic acid) by chemical co‐precipitation method |
response time: 4 s detection limit: 0.2 µmol/L shelf life: 30 d |
glucose biosensor | [108] |
| tyrosinase and xanthine oxidase | cyclodextrin‐capped APTES‐coated super‐paramagnetic nanoparticles |
detection limit xanthine oxidase: 22 nmol tyrosinase: 2 µmol |
electrochemical biosensor for detection of cathecol and xanthine | [160] |
| cholesterol oxidase | MNPs |
E a (kJ/mol) free enzyme: 13.6 immobilised enzyme: 9.3 |
analysis of total cholesterol in serum | [136] |
| Enzyme | Nanoparticles used | Kinetic parameters | Applications | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bioremediation of waste water | ||||
| Trametes laccase | Cu2+ ‐chelated magnetised mesoporous MNPs functionalised with 3‐chloro propyl trimethoxysilane and ABTS |
V max (mmol/L min) free enzyme: 0.103 immobilised enzyme: 0.095 retained 72.6% activity after 10 cycles |
degradation of phenol in coking waste water | [161] |
| horse radish peroxidase | Fe3 O4 /chemically reduced graphene oxide nanocomposite |
Km (mmol/L) free enzyme: 10.25 immobilised enzyme: 8.81 retained 70% activity after 10 cycles |
removal of phenolic compounds | [162] |
| Trametes versicolor laccase | bimodal carbon‐based mesoporous magnetic nanocomposite |
residual activity free enzyme: 20% immobilised enzyme: 20% |
degradation of phenols | [61] |
| laccase | poly 4(vinyl pyridine)‐grafted MNPS |
Km (mmol) free enzyme: 0.32 immobilised enzyme: 0.41 retained 59% activity after 5 weeks |
degradation of textile dyes | [163] |
| laccase | chitosan–MNPs |
Km (mmol) free enzyme: 5.69 immobilised enzyme: 10.69 |
bioremediation of environmental pollutants | [164] |
4.1 Lipase
Lipase is a ubiquitous enzyme of considerable importance and industrial potential. They offer as a biocatalyst in a wide range of industrial applications such as in oleochemical, detergent, organic industry, leather industry, environmental management, cosmetic and perfume industries, and many other biomedical applications [165]. It has also been now used in the food industry as a flavour and aroma constituent [166]. The application of lipase as a free enzyme is not favourable for industrial application because of its difficulty to recover and reuse. Also, its poor stability in free form hinders its possibility to withstand many catalytic cycles [167]. This can be overcome by immobilisation of lipase on to various supports [168]. The MNPs has been reported for the immobilisation of lipases from different sources which offer improved stability and recovery [53, 169].
Sui et al. [141] immobilised lipase onto the surface‐modified MNPs by chemical co‐precipitation method through carbodiimide activation. The pH and thermal stability of the lipase was greatly improved than that of the free enzyme. 70% of the initial activity is retained by the MNPs after 30 days. A novel and efficient lipase immobilisation to form chemical cross‐linked enzyme aggregates (CLEAs) by chemical co‐precipitation method using APTES and glutaraldehyde has been reported for the synthesis of 1,3‐diacyl‐glycerol from fatty acids which play a major role in food industry [157].
4.2 Laccase
Laccase, a copper‐containing enzyme, catalyses the oxidation of phenolic and non‐phenolic substrates and other highly recalcitrant environmental pollutants. They have been employed for various bioprocess applications especially in the industrial wastewater treatment [169, 170, 171, 172]. Laccase has been immobilised in various supports including polymers, sepabeads [173], polypyrrole [174], and manganese dioxide nanoparticles decorated with MWCNTS/PANI composite. A novel metal chelating fibrous polymer; poly vinyl pyrrolidone and Cu II were grafted onto the magnetic beads and used for the reversible immobilisation of laccase and used for the degradation of textile dyes at a higher rate [175]. Recent study revealed that laccase immobilisation onto the magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) was found to be highly supported in the acidic pHs [176].
4.3 Pectinase
Pectinase is one of the most important enzyme which catalyses several important industrial processes such as plant fibre processing industry, coffee and tea extraction, extraction of oils and also in waste water treatment [159]. The treatments of waste in industries become difficult because of the degradation‐resistance and high viscous nature of pectin [177]. It also plays a major role in fruit juice processing industries to degrade the pectic substances imparting turbidity and undesirable suspension. A novel method of impregnating pectinase onto the co‐precipitated silica‐coated surface‐modified MNPs using covalently bound amino and carboxyl groups as coupling agents has greatly improved the enzyme activity and storage stability [13, 143].
4.4 Other industrially important enzymes
The immobilisation of lactase onto MNPs is of considerable importance in the biosensor and ingredient processing applications. Talbert and Goddard [112] has covalently immobilised lactase isolated from A. oryzae by carbodiimide activation to functionalise the MNPs. This enzyme conjugated MNPs open a new horizon to produce a simple and effective conjugated lactase system that achieving both particle and enzyme specificity.
The higher immobilisation rate was observed for amylase immobilisation onto acacia gum used as a stabilising agent for catalysing the hydrolysis of starch [161]. The bound amylase demonstrated high catalytic activity and retained its activity after six cycles of reuse which is extremely advantageous to the industry. MNP‐gold core shell nanoparticles has been synthesised and used for the attachment of trypsin and glucose oxidase. The enzymes immobilised by forming CLEAs onto MNPs are also reported [13], amyloglucosidase (AMG) was covalently attached to the MNPs to form a monolayer and was followed by forming CLEAs with free AMG which greatly improved the enzyme activity and stability with respect to temperature and reusability. Recently, the large‐scale production of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles has been studied for clinical uses [177].
5 Conclusions
MNPs‐mediated immobilisation exhibits remarkable enzyme stability for industrially important bioprocesses, product development and also possess properties like reusability and recyclability as they can be subjected to magnetic decantation. By analysing various nano carriers, MNPs have been considered as a suitable carrier for immobilisation of enzyme due to their super‐paramagnetic behaviour, low toxicity and has no external diffusion. The applicability towards easy surface modification, activation and as a carrier for wide range of industrially important enzymes attracts many researchers towards further research. The detailed investigation from the above discussion about the interactions between MNPs and enzyme through various surface activation and modification would pave a limelight to the development of enhanced enzymatic activity.
6 References
- 1. Johannes T. Simurdiak M.R. Zhao H.: ‘Biocatalysis’, in Lee S. (ED.): ‘Encyclopedia of chemical processing’ (Taylor & Francis, New York, 2016), pp. 101 –110 [Google Scholar]
- 2. Sheldon R.A. van Pelt S.: ‘Enzyme immobilisation in biocatalysis: why, what and how’, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2013, 42, pp. 6223 –6235 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Ge J. Lu D. Liu Z. et al.: ‘Recent advances in nanostructured biocatalysts’, Biochem. Eng. J., 2009, 44, pp. 53 –59 [Google Scholar]
- 4. May O. Nguyen P.T. Arnold F.H.: ‘Inverting enantioselectivity by directed evolution of hydantoinase for improved production of L‐methionine’, Nat. Biotechnol., 2000, 18, pp. 317 –320 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Cirino P.C. Arnold F.H.: ‘Protein engineering of oxygenases for biocatalysis’, Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol., 2002, 6, pp. 130 –135 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Bornscheuer U.T. Pohl M.: ‘Improved biocatalysts by directed evolution and rational protein design’, Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol., 2000, 5, pp. 137 –143 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Tischer W. Kasche V.: ‘Immobilized enzymes: crystals or carriers?’, Trends Biotechnol., 1999, 17, pp. 326 –335 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Iyer P.V. Ananthanarayan L.: ‘Enzyme stability and stabilization‐aqueous and non‐aqueous environment’, Process Biochem., 2008, 43, pp. 1019 –1032 [Google Scholar]
- 9. D'Souza S.F.: ‘Immobilized enzyme in bioprocess’, Curr. Sci., 1999, 77, pp. 69 –79 [Google Scholar]
- 10. Lewis R.V. Renugopalakrishnan V.: ‘Bionanotechnology, proteins to nanodevices’ (Springer, 2006) [Google Scholar]
- 11. Hegedus I. Nagy E.: ‘Comparison of the structure and the stability of single enzyme nanoparticles’, Hung. J. Ind. Chem., 2009, 37, pp. 123 –130 [Google Scholar]
- 12. Seenuvasan M. Kumar K.S. Kumar M.A. et al.: ‘Response surface estimation and canonical quantification for the pectin degrading Fe3 O4 ‐SiO2 nanobiocatalyst fabrication’, Int. J. ChemTech. Res., 2014a, 6, pp. 3618 –3627 [Google Scholar]
- 13. Seenuvasan M. Kumar K.S. Malar G.C.G. et al.: ‘Characterization, analysis, and application of fabricated Fe3 O4 ‐chitosan‐pectinase nanobiocatalyst’, Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol., 2014b, 172, pp. 2706 –2719 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Seenuvasan M. Malar G.C.G. Preethi S. et al.: ‘Fabrication, characterization and application of pectin degrading Fe3 O4 ‐SiO2 nanobiocatalyst’, Mater. Sci. Eng. C, 2013a, 33, pp. 2273 –2279 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Kirk O. Borchert T.V. Fuglsang C.C.: ‘Industrial enzyme applications’, Curr. Opin. Biotechnol., 2002, 1, pp. 345 –351 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Sarrouh B. Santos T.M. Miyoshi A. et al.: ‘Up‐to‐date insight on industrial enzymes applications and global market’, J. Bioprocess. Biotech., 2012, 4, pp. 1 –10 [Google Scholar]
- 17. Sojitra U.V. Nadar S.S. Rathod V.K.: ‘Immobilization of pectinase onto chitosan magnetic nanoparticles by macromolecular cross‐linker’, Carbohydr. Polym., 2017, 157, pp. 677 –685 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Chandel A.K. Rudravaram R. Rao L.V. et al.: ‘Industrial enzymes in bio‐industrial sector development: an Indian perspective’, J. Commer. Biotechnol., 2007, 13, pp. 283 –291 [Google Scholar]
- 19. Brena B.M. Viera B.F.: ‘Methods in biotechnology: immobilization of enzymes and cells’ (Humana Press, 2nd edn., 2006) [Google Scholar]
- 20. Rozzell J.D.: ‘Commercial scale biocatalysis: myths and realities’, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 1999, 7, pp. 2253 –2261 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Bickerstaff G.F.: ‘Immobilization of enzymes and cells’, Meth. Biotechnol., 1997, 1, pp. 1 –11 [Google Scholar]
- 22. Faber K.: ‘Biotransformations in organic chemistry: a textbook’ (Springer‐Verlag, 3rd edn., 1997) [Google Scholar]
- 23. Wong C.H. Whitesides G.M.: ‘Enzymes in synthetic organic chemistry’ (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1997) [Google Scholar]
- 24. Mateo C. Palomo J.M. Lorente G.F. et al.: ‘Improvement of enzyme activity, stability and selectivity via immobilization techniques’, Enzyme Microb. Technol., 2007, 40, pp. 1451 –1463 [Google Scholar]
- 25. Xia T. Liu C. Hu J. et al.: ‘Improved performance of immobilized laccase on amine‐functioned magnetic Fe3 O4 nanoparticles modified with polyethylenimine’, Chem. Eng., 2016, 295, pp. 201 –206 [Google Scholar]
- 26. Velde V.F. Lourenco N.D. Pinheiro H.M. et al.: ‘Carrageenan: a food‐grade and biocompatible support for immobilization techniques’, Adv Synth Catal., 2002, 344, pp. 815 –835 [Google Scholar]
- 27. Chaplin M.F. Bucke C.: ‘Enzyme technology’ (Cambridge University Press, 1999) [Google Scholar]
- 28. Bullock C.: ‘Immobilised enzymes’, Sci. Prog., 1995, 78, pp. 119 –134 [Google Scholar]
- 29. Moehlenbrock M.J. Minteer S.D.: ‘Introduction to the field of enzyme immobilization and stabilization’, Methods Mol. Biol., 2017, 1504, pp. 1 –7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Ashjaria M. Mohammadi M. Badri R.: ‘Chemical amination of Rhizopus oryzae lipase for multipoint covalent immobilization on epoxy‐functionalized supports: modulation of stability and selectivity’, J. Mol. Catal. B Enzym., 2015, 115, pp. 128 –134 [Google Scholar]
- 31. Verma M.L. Puri M. Barrow C.J.: ‘Recent trends in nanomaterials immobilised enzymes for biofuel production’, Crit. Rev. Biotechnol., 2014, 14, pp. 1 –12 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Cipolatti E.P. Silva M.J.A. Klein M. et al.: ‘Current status and trends in enzymatic nanoimmobilization’, J. Mol. Catal. B Enzym., 2014, 99, pp. 56 –67 [Google Scholar]
- 33. Xu J. Zeng F. Wu S. et al.: ‘Gold nanoparticles bound on microgel particles and their application as an enzyme support’, Nanotechnology, 2007, 18, p. 265704 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Brennan J.L. Hatzakis N.S. Tshikhudo T.R. et al.: ‘Bionanoconjugation via click chemistry: the creation of functional hybrids of lipases and gold nanoparticles’, Bioconjugate Chem., 2006, 17, pp. 1373 –1375 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Phadtare S. Vinod V.P. Mukhopadhyay K. et al.: ‘Immobilization and biocatalytic activity of fungal protease on gold nanoparticle‐loaded zeolite microspheres’, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 2004, 85, pp. 629 –637 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Li J. Wang J. Gavalas V.G. et al.: ‘Alumina‐pepsin hybrid nanoparticles with orientation‐specific enzyme coupling’, Nano Lett.., 2003, 3, pp. 55 –58 [Google Scholar]
- 37. Wang Y. Caruso F.: ‘Mesoporous silica spheres as supports for enzyme immobilization and encapsulation’, Chem. Mater., 2005, 17, pp. 953 –961 [Google Scholar]
- 38. Dyal A. Loos K. Noto M. et al.: ‘Activity of Candida rugosa lipase immobilized on γ‐Fe2 O3 magnetic nanoparticles’, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2003, 125, pp. 1684 –1685 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Narayanan S.S. Sarkar R. Pal S.K.: ‘Structural and functional characterization of enzyme‐quantum dot conjugates: covalent attachment of CdS nanocrystal to α‐chymotrypsin’, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2007, 111, pp. 11539 –11543 [Google Scholar]
- 40. Herdt A.R. Kim B. Taton T.A.: ‘Encapsulated magnetic nanoparticles as supports for proteins and recyclable biocatalysts’, Bioconjugate Chem., 2007, 18, pp. 183 –189 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Tsang S.C. Yu C.H. Gao X. et al.: ‘Silica‐encapsulated nanomagnetic particle as a new recoverable biocatalyst carrier’, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2006, 110, pp. 16914 –16922 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Crespilho F. Ghica M.E. Florescu M. et al.: ‘A strategy for enzyme immobilization on layer‐by‐layer dendrimer‐gold nanoparticle electrocatalytic membrane incorporating redox mediator’, Electrochem. Commun., 2006, 8, pp. 1665 –1670 [Google Scholar]
- 43. Li Y. Xu X. Deng C. et al.: ‘Immobilization of trypsin on superparamagnetic nanoparticles for rapid and effective proteolysis’, J. Proteome Res., 2007, 6, pp. 3849 –3855 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Bai Y. Yang H. Yang W. et al.: ‘Gold nanoparticles‐mesoporous silica composite used as an enzyme immobilization matrix for amperometric glucose biosensor construction’, Sensor Actuat. B Chem., 2007, 124, pp. 179 –186 [Google Scholar]
- 45. Lu A.H. Salabas E.L. Schth F.: ‘Magnetic nanoparticles: synthesis, protection, functionalization, and application’, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2007, 46, pp. 1222 –1244 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Crespilho F.N. Iost R.M. Travain S.A. et al.: ‘Enzyme immobilization on Ag nanoparticles/polyaniline nanocomposites’, Biosens. Bioelectron., 2009, 24, pp. 3073 –3077 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Chen Y.Z. Ching C.B. Xu R.: ‘Lipase immobilization on modified zirconia nanoparticles: studies on the effects of modifiers’, Process Biochem., 2009, 44, pp. 1245 –1251 [Google Scholar]
- 48. Cruz J.C. Pfromm P.H. Tomich J.M. et al.: ‘Conformational changes and catalytic competency of hydrolases adsorbing on fumed silica nanoparticles: tertiary structure’, Colloid Surf B, 2010, 79, pp. 97 –104 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Liu W. Zhang S. Wang P.: ‘Nanoparticle‐supported multi‐enzyme biocatalysis with in situ cofactor regeneration’, J. Biotechnol., 2009, 139, pp. 102 –117 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Gupta A.K. Gupta M.: ‘Synthesis and surface engineering of iron oxide nanoparticles for biomedical applications’, Biomaterials, 2005, 26, pp. 3995 –4021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Betancor L. Fuentes M. Dellamora‐Ortiz G. et al.: ‘Dextran aldehyde coating of glucose oxidase immobilized on magnetic nanoparticles prevents its inactivation by gas bubbles’, J. Mol. Catal. B Enzym., 2005, 31, pp. 97 –101 [Google Scholar]
- 52. Zeinali S.F. Majidi S Nikzamir N. et al.: ‘Magnetic nanoparticles as potential candidates for biomedical and biological applications’, Artif. Cells Nanomed. Biotechnol., 2015, 23, pp. 1 –10 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Siodmiak T. Borowska M.Z. Marszałł M.P.: ‘Lipase‐immobilized magnetic chitosan nanoparticles for kinetic resolution of (R,S)‐ibuprofen’, J. Mol. Catal. B Enzym., 2013, 94, pp. 7 –14 [Google Scholar]
- 54. Li L. Gao F. Jiang W. et al.: ‘Folic acid‐conjugated superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles for tumor‐targeting MR imaging’, Drug Deliv., 2015, 26, pp. 1 –8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Kuroiwa T. Izuta H. Nabetani H. et al.: ‘Selective and stable production of physiologically active chitosan oligosaccharides using an enzymatic membrane bioreactor’, Process Biochem., 2009, 43, pp. 283 –287 [Google Scholar]
- 56. Pimentel M.C.B. Leao A.B.F. Melo E.H.M. et al.: ‘Immobilization of Candida rugosa lipase on magnetized Dacron: kinetic study’, Artif. Cells Nanomed. Biotechnol., 2007, 35, pp. 221 –235 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Salimi A. Sharifi E. Noorbakhsh A. et al.: ‘Immobilization of glucose oxidase on electrodeposited nickel oxide nanoparticles: direct electron transfer and electrocatalytic activity’, Biosens. Bioelectron., 2007, 22, pp. 3146 –3153 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Cao M. Li Z. Wang J. et al.: ‘Food related applications of magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles: enzyme immobilization, protein purification, and food analysis’, Trend Food Sci. Tech., 2012, 27, pp. 47 –56 [Google Scholar]
- 59. Koneracka M. Kopcansky P. Antalık M. et al.: ‘Immobilization of proteins and enzymes to fine magnetic particles’, J. Magn. Magn. Mater., 1999, 201, pp. 427 –430 [Google Scholar]
- 60. Indira T.K. Lakshmi P.K.: ‘Magnetic nanoparticles‐a review’, Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Nanotechnol., 2010, 3, pp. 1035 –1042 [Google Scholar]
- 61. Mahdavi M. Ahmad M.B. Haron M.J. et al.: ‘Synthesis, surface modification and characterization of biocompatible magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles for biomedical applications’, Molecules, 2013, 18, pp. 7533 –7548 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Shaw S.Y. Chen Y.J. Ou J.J. et al.: ‘Preparation and characterisation of Pseudomonas putida esterase immobilized on magnetic nanoparticles’, Enzyme Microb. Technol., 2006, 39, pp. 1089 –1095 [Google Scholar]
- 63. Wu X. Zhang Y. Wu C. et al.: ‘Preparation and characterization of magnetic Fe3 O4 /CRGO nanocomposites for enzyme immobilization’, Trans. Nonferr. Metal Soc., 2012, 22, pp. 162 –168 [Google Scholar]
- 64. Wu Y. Wang Y. Luo G. et al.: ‘In situ preparation of magnetic Fe3 O4 ‐chitosan nanoparticles for lipase immobilization by cross‐linking and oxidation in aqueous solution’, Bioresour. Technol., 2009, 100, pp. 3459 –3464 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Jiang Y. Guo C. Xia H. et al.: ‘Magnetic nanoparticles supported ionic liquids for lipase immobilization: enzyme activity in catalyzing esterification’, J. Mol. Catal. B Enzym., 2009, 58, pp. 103 –109 [Google Scholar]
- 66. Huang S.H. Liao M.H. Chen D.H.: ‘Direct binding and characterization of lipase onto magnetic nanoparticles’, Biotechnol. Prog., 2003, 19, pp. 1095 –1100 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Ma M. Zhang Y. Yu W. et al.: ‘Preparation and characterization of magnetite nanoparticles coated by amino silane’, Colloid Surf. A, 2003, 212, pp. 219 –226 [Google Scholar]
- 68. Bucak S. Jones D.A. Laibinis P.E. et al.: ‘Protein separation using colloidal magnetic nanoparticles’, Biotechnol. Prog., 2003, 19, pp. 477 –484 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Koneracka M. Kopcansky P. Timko M. et al.: ‘Direct binding procedure of proteins and enzymes to fine magnetic particles’, J. Magn. Magn. Mater., 2002, 252, pp. 409 –411 [Google Scholar]
- 70. Akgol S. Kacar Y. Denizli A. et al.: ‘Hydrolysis of sucrose by inver‐tase immobilized onto novel magnetic polyvinylalcohol microspheres’, Food Chem., 2001, 74, pp. 281 –288 [Google Scholar]
- 71. Tong X.D. Xue B. Sun Y.: ‘A novel magnetic affinity support for protein adsorption and purification’, Biotechnol. Prog., 2001, 17, pp. 134 –139 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Chen J.P. Su D.R.: ‘Latex particles with thermo‐flocculation and magnetic properties for immobilization of α‐chymotrypsin’, Biotechnol. Prog., 2001, 17, pp. 369 –375 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Bahar T. Celebi S.S.: ‘Characterization of glucoamylase immobilized on magnetic poly (styrene) particles’, Enzyme Microb. Technol., 1998, 23, pp. 301 –304 [Google Scholar]
- 74. Mehta R.V. Upadhyay R.V. Charles S.W. et al.: ‘Direct binding of protein to magnetic particles’, Biotechnol. Tech., 1997, 11, pp. 493 –496 [Google Scholar]
- 75. Kobayashi H. Matsunaga T.: ‘Amino‐silane modified superparamagnetic particles with surface‐immobilized enzyme’, J. Colloid Interf. Sci., 1991, 141, pp. 505 –511 [Google Scholar]
- 76. Balaji N. Kumar K.S. Seenuvasan M. et al.: ‘Immobilization of laccase onto micro‐emulsified magnetic nanoparticles for enhanced degradation of a textile recalcitrant’, J. Env. Biol., 2016, 37, pp. 1489 –1496 [Google Scholar]
- 77. Stankic S. Suman S. Haque F. et al.: ‘Pure and multi metal oxide nanoparticles: synthesis, antibacterial and cytotoxic properties’, J. Nanobiotechnol., 2016, 14, p. 73 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Majidi S. Zeinali S.F. Farkhani S.M. et al.: ‘Current methods for synthesis of magnetic nanoparticles’, Artif. Cells Nanomed. Biotechnol., 2014, 1, pp. 1 –13 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Tavakoli A. Sohrabi M. Kargari A.: ‘A review of methods for synthesis of nanostructured metals with emphasis on iron compounds’, Chem. Pap., 2007, 61, pp. 151 –170 [Google Scholar]
- 80. Pierson H.O.: ‘Handbook of chemical vapor deposition: principles, technology and applications’ (William Andrew Inc., 1999) [Google Scholar]
- 81. Sun X. Gutierrez A. Yacaman M.J. et al.: ‘Investigations on magnetic properties and structure for carbon encapsulated nanoparticles of Fe, Co, Ni’, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2000, 286, pp. 157 –160 [Google Scholar]
- 82. Dravid V.P. Host J.J. Teng M.H. et al.: ‘Controlled‐size nanocapsules’, Nature, 1995, 374, p. 602 [Google Scholar]
- 83. Teng M.H. Host J.J. Hwang J.H. et al.: ‘Nanophase Ni particles produced by a blown arc method’, J. Mater. Res., 1995, 10, pp. 233 –236 [Google Scholar]
- 84. Gubin S.P. Koksharov Y.A. Khomutov G.B. et al.: ‘Magnetic nanoparticles: preparation, structure and properties’, Russ. Chem. Rev., 2005, 74, pp. 489 –520 [Google Scholar]
- 85. Ang K.H. Alexandrou I. Mathur N.D. et al.: ‘The effect of carbon encapsulation on the magnetic properties of Ni nanoparticles produced by arc discharge in de‐ionized water’, Nanotechnology, 2004, 15, p. 520 [Google Scholar]
- 86. Wang C.F. Wang J.N. Sheng Z.M.: ‘Solid‐phase synthesis of carbon‐encapsulated magnetic nanoparticles’, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2007, 111, pp. 6303 –6307 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87. Buschow K.H.G.: ‘Hand book of magnetic materials’ (Elsevier, 2006) [Google Scholar]
- 88. Santra S. Tapec R. Theodoropoulou N. et al.: ‘Synthesis and characterization of silica‐coated iron oxide nanoparticles in microemulsion? The effect of nonionic surfactants’, Langmuir, 2001, 17, pp. 2900 –2906 [Google Scholar]
- 89. Liu C. Zou B. Rondinone A.J. et al.: ‘Reverse micelle synthesis and characterization of superparamagnetic MnFe2 O4 spinel ferrite nanocrystallites’, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2000, 104, pp. 1141 –1145 [Google Scholar]
- 90. Dresco P.A. Zaitsev V.S. Gambino R.J. et al.: ‘Preparation and properties of magnetite and polymer magnetite nanoparticles’, Langmuir, 1999, 15, pp. 1945 –1951 [Google Scholar]
- 91. Perez J.A.L. Quintela M.A.L. Mira J. et al.: ‘Advances in the preparation of magnetic nanoparticles by the microemulsion method’, J. Phys. Chem. B, 1997, 101, pp. 8045 –8047 [Google Scholar]
- 92. Lee K.M. Sorensen C.M. Klabunde K.J. et al.: ‘Synthesis and characterization of stable colloidal Fe3 O4 particles in water‐in‐oil microemulsions’, IEEE Trans. Magn., 1992, 28, pp. 3180 –3182 [Google Scholar]
- 93. Kwon S.G. Piao Y. Park J. et al.: ‘Kinetics of monodisperse iron oxide nanocrystal formation by ‘heating‐up’ process’, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2007, 129, pp. 12571 –12584 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94. Gozuak F. Koseoglu Y. Baykal A. et al.: ‘Synthesis and characterization of CoxZn1‐xFe2O4 magnetic nanoparticles via a PEG‐assisted route’, J. Magn. Magn. Mater.., 2009, 321, pp. 2170 –2177 [Google Scholar]
- 95. Wang J. Ren F. Yi R. et al.: ‘Solvothermal synthesis and magnetic properties of size‐controlled nickel ferrite nanoparticles’, J. Alloy Compd., 2009, 479, pp. 791 –796 [Google Scholar]
- 96. Zhu H. Yang D. Zhu L.: ‘Hydrothermal growth and characterization of magnetite (Fe3 O4) thin films’, Surf. Coat. Tech., 2007, 201, pp. 5870 –5874 [Google Scholar]
- 97. Mao B. Kang Z. Wang E. et al.: ‘Synthesis of magnetite octahedrons from iron powders through a mild hydrothermal method’, Mater. Res. Bull., 2006, 41, pp. 2226 –2231 [Google Scholar]
- 98. Giri S. Samanta S. Maji S. et al.: ‘Magnetic properties of α‐Fe2 O3 nanoparticle synthesized by a new hydrothermal method’, J. Magn. Magn. Mater., 2005, 285, pp. 296 –302 [Google Scholar]
- 99. Butter K. Kassapidou K. Vroege G.J. et al.: ‘Preparation and properties of colloidal iron dispersions’, J. Colloid Interf. Sci., 2005, 287, pp. 485 –495 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100. Wang J. Sun J. Sun Q. et al.: ‘One‐step hydrothermal process to prepare highly crystalline Fe3 O4 nanoparticles with improved magnetic properties’, Mater. Res. Bull., 2003, 38, pp. 1113 –1118 [Google Scholar]
- 101. Iida H. Takayanagi K. Nakanishi T. et al.: ‘Synthesis of Fe3 O4 nanoparticles with various sizes and magnetic properties by controlled hydrolysis’, J. Colloid Interf. Sci., 2007, 314, pp. 274 –280 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102. Namboodiri V.V. Varma R.S.: ‘Microwave‐accelerated Suzuki cross‐coupling reaction in polyethylene glycol (PEG)’, Green Chem., 2001, 3, pp. 146 –148 [Google Scholar]
- 103. Yang Z. Si S. Zhang C.: ‘Magnetic single‐enzyme nanoparticles with high activity and stability’, Biochem. Bioph. Res. Co., 2008, 367, pp. 169 –175 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104. Hu J. Lo I.M.C. Chen G.: ‘Comparative study of various magnetic nanoparticles for Cr(VI) removal’, Sep. Purif. Technol., 2007, 56, pp. 249 –256 [Google Scholar]
- 105. Wu S. Sun A. Zhai F. et al.: ‘Fe3 O4 magnetic nanoparticles synthesis from tailings by ultrasonic chemical co‐precipitation’, Mater. Lett., 2011, 65, pp. 1882 –1884 [Google Scholar]
- 106. Mashhadizadeh M.H. Diva M.A.: ‘Drug‐carrying amino silane coated magnetic nanoparticles as potential vehicles for delivery of antibiotics’, J. Nanomed. Nanotechnol., 2012, 3, pp. 1 –7 [Google Scholar]
- 107. Wu W. He Q. Chen H. et al.: ‘Sonochemical synthesis, structure and magnetic properties of air‐stable Fe3 O4 /Au nanoparticles’, Nanotechnology, 2007, 18, pp. 145609 –145613 [Google Scholar]
- 108. Liu X. Ma Z. Xing J. et al.: ‘Preparation and characterization of amino‐silane modified superparamagnetic silica nanoparticles’, J. Magn. Magn. Mater., 2004, 270, pp. 1 –6 [Google Scholar]
- 109. Duran N. Rosa M.A. D'Annibale A. et al.: ‘Applications of laccases and tyrosinases (phenoloxidases) immobilized on different supports: a review’, Enzyme Microb. Technol., 2002, 31, pp. 907 –931 [Google Scholar]
- 110. Kros A. Gerritsen M. Sprakel V.S.I. et al.: ‘Silica‐based hybrid materials as biocompatible coatings for glucose sensors’, Sensor Actuat. B Chem., 2001, 81, pp. 68 –75 [Google Scholar]
- 111. He H. Cai R. Wang Y. et al.: ‘Preparation and characterization of silk sericin/PVA blend film with silver nanoparticles for potential antimicrobial application’, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 2017, 104, pp. 457 –464. doi: 10.1088/1361–6528/aa79e1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112. Talbert J.N. Goddard J.M.: ‘Characterization of lactase‐conjugated magnetic nanoparticles’, Process Biochem., 2013, 48, pp. 656 –662 [Google Scholar]
- 113. Faraji M. Yamini Y. Rezaee M.: ‘Magnetic nanoparticles: synthesis, stabilization, functionalization, characterization, and applications’, J. Iran. Chem. Soc., 2010, 1, pp. 1 –37 [Google Scholar]
- 114. Michalet X. Pinaud F.F. Bentolila L.A. et al.: ‘Quantum dots for live cells, in vivo imaging, and diagnostics’, Science, 2005, 307, pp. 538 –544 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115. Medintz I.L. Uyeda H.T. Goldman E.R. et al.: ‘Quantum dot bioconjugates for imaging, labelling and sensing’, Nat. Mater., 2005, 4, pp. 435 –446 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116. Yamaura M. Camilo R.L. Sampaio L.C. et al.: ‘Preparation and characterization of (3‐aminopropyl) triethoxysilane coated magnetite nanoparticles’, J. Magn. Magn. Mater., 2004, 279, pp. 210 –217 [Google Scholar]
- 117. Smith E.A. Chen W.: ‘How to prevent the loss of surface functionality derived from aminosilanes’, Langmuir, 2008, 24, pp. 12405 –12409 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118. Chen Y. Tsai M. Chi M. et al.: ‘Covalent immobilization of bacillus licheniformis γ‐glutamyl transpeptidase on aldehyde‐functionalized magnetic nanoparticles’, Int. J. Mol. Sci., 2013, 14, pp. 4613 –4628 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119. Okamoto Y. Minami S. Matsuhashi A. et al.: ‘Application of polymeric n‐acetyl‐D‐glucosamine (chitin) to veterinary practice’, J. Vet. Med. Sci., 1993, 55, pp. 743 –747 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120. Chandy T. Sharma C.P.: ‘Chitosan‐as a biomaterial’, Biomater. Artif. Cells Artif. Organs., 1990, 18, pp. 1 –24 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121. Magnin D. Dumitriu S. Magny P. et al.: ‘Lipase immobilization into porous chitosan beads: activities in aqueous and organic media and lipase localization’, Biotechnol. Prog., 2001, 17, pp. 734 –737 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122. Rinaudo M.: ‘Chitin and chitosan: properties and applications’, Prog. Polym. Sci., 2006, 31, pp. 603 –632 [Google Scholar]
- 123. Juang R.S. Wu F.C. Tseng R.L.: ‘Use of chemically modified chitosan beads for sorption and enzyme immobilization’, Adv. Environ. Res., 2002, 6, pp. 171 –177 [Google Scholar]
- 124. Biro E. Nemeth A.S. Sisak C. et al.: ‘Preparation of chitosan particles suitable for enzyme immobilization’, J. Biochem. Biophys. Meth., 2008, 70, pp. 1240 –1246 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125. Orrego C.E. Salgado N. Valencia J.S. et al.: ‘Novel chitosan membranes as support for lipases immobilization: characterization aspects’, Carbohyd. Polym., 2010, 79, pp. 9 –16 [Google Scholar]
- 126. Wu Y. Wang Y. Luo G. et al.: ‘Effect of solvents and precipitant on the properties of chitosan nanoparticles in a water‐in‐oil microemulsion and its lipase immobilization performance’, Bioresour. Technol., 2010, 101, pp. 841 –844 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127. Jiang D.S. Long S.Y. Huang J. et al.: ‘Immobilization of Pycnoporus sanguineus laccase on magnetic chitosan microspheres’, Biochem. Eng. J., 2005, 25, pp. 15 –23 [Google Scholar]
- 128. Liu Y. Jia S. Wu Q. et al.: ‘Studies of Fe3 O4 ‐chitosan nanoparticles prepared by co‐precipitation under the magnetic field for lipase immobilization’, Catal. Commun., 2011, 12, pp. 717 –720 [Google Scholar]
- 129. Kuo C.H. Liu Y.C. Chang C.M.J. et al.: ‘Optimum conditions for lipase immobilization on chitosan‐coated Fe3 O4 nanoparticles’, Carbohyd. Polym., 2012, 87, pp. 2538 –2545 [Google Scholar]
- 130. Zhu X. Wang Y. Leung K. et al.: ‘Enhanced cellular uptake of aminosilane coated superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles in mammalian cell lines’, Int. J. Nanomed., 2012, 7, pp. 953 –964 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131. Ulman A.: ‘Formation and structure of self‐assembled monolayers’, Chem. Rev., 1996, 96, pp. 1533 –1554 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132. Tartaj P. Morales M.D. Verdaguer V.S. et al.: ‘The preparation of magnetic nanoparticles for applications in biomedicine’, J. Phys. D Appl. Phys., 2003, 36, pp. R182 –R197 [Google Scholar]
- 133. Wang F. Guo C. Yang L. et al.: ‘Magnetic mesoporous silica nanoparticles: fabrication and their laccase immobilization performance’, Bioresour. Technol., 2010, 101, pp. 8931 –8935 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134. Jin X. Li J.F. Huang P.Y. et al.: ‘Immobilized protease on the magnetic nanoparticles used for the hydrolysis of rapeseed meals’, J. Magn. Magn. Mater., 2010, 322, pp. 2031 –2037 [Google Scholar]
- 135. Wang H. Huang J. Wang C. et al.: ‘Immobilization of glucose oxidase using CoFe2 O4 /SiO2 nanoparticles as carrier’, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2011, 257, pp. 5739 –5745 [Google Scholar]
- 136. Ashtari K. Khadijeh K. Fasihi J. et al.: ‘Silica‐encapsulated magnetic nanoparticles: enzyme immobilization and cytotoxic study’, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 2012, 50, pp. 1063 –1069 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137. Bruno L.M. Coelho J.S. Melo E.H.M. et al.: ‘Characterization of Mucor miehei lipase immobilized on polysiloxane‐polyvinyl alcohol magnetic particles’, World J. Microb. Biotechnol., 2005, 21, pp. 189 –192 [Google Scholar]
- 138. Abahazi E. Boros Z. Poppe L.: ‘Additives enhancing the catalytic properties of lipase from Burkholderia cepacia immobilized on mixed‐function‐grafted mesoporous silica gel’, Molecules, 2014, 19, pp. 9818 –9837 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139. Sheehan J. Cruickshank P. Boshart G.: ‘A convenient synthesis of water‐soluble carbodiimides’, J. Org. Chem., 1961, 26, pp. 2525 –2528 [Google Scholar]
- 140. Jordan J. Kumar C.S.S.R. Theegala C.: ‘Preparation and characterization of cellulase‐bound magnetite nanoparticles’, J. Mol. Catal. B Enzym., 2011, 68, pp. 139 –146 [Google Scholar]
- 141. Sui Y. Cui Y. Nie Y. et al.: ‘Surface modification of magnetite nanoparticles using gluconic acid and their application in immobilized lipase’, Colloid Surf. B, 2012, 93, pp. 24 –28 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142. Kouassi G.K. Irudayaraj J. McCarty G.: ‘Examination of cholesterol oxidase attachment to magnetic nanoparticles’, J. Nanobiotechnol., 2005, 3, pp. 1 –9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143. Seenuvasan M. Malar G.C.G. Preethi S. et al.: ‘Immobilization of pectinase on to co‐precipitated magnetic nanoparticles for its enhanced stability and activity’, Res. J. Biotech., 2013b, 8, pp. 24 –30 [Google Scholar]
- 144. Singh R.S. Singh R.P. Kennedy J.F.: ‘Immobilization of yeast inulinase on chitosan beads for the hydrolysis of inulin in a batch system’, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 2017, 95, pp. 87 –93 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145. Ibrahim A.S.S. Al‐Salamah A.A. Ei‐Toni A.M. et al.: ‘Immobilisation of cyclodextrin glucanotransferase on aminopropyl‐functionalized silica‐coated superparamagnetic nanoparticles’, Electron. J. Biotech., 2013, 16, pp. 1 –16 [Google Scholar]
- 146. Costa‐Silva T.A. Marques P.S. Souza C.R. et al.: ‘Enzyme encapsulation in magnetic chitosan‐Fe3O4 microparticles’, J. Microencapsul., 2014, 8, pp. 1 –6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147. Barbosa O. Ortiz C. Berenguer‐Murcia A. et al.: ‘Glutaraldehyde in bio‐catalysts design: a useful crosslinker and a versatile tool in enzyme immobilization’, RSC Adv., 2014, 4, pp. 1583 –1600 [Google Scholar]
- 148. Adriano W.S. Mendonca D.B. Rodrigues D.S. et al.: ‘Improving the properties of chitosan as support for the covalent multipoint immobilization of chymotrypsin’, Biomacromolecules, 2005, 9, pp. 2170 –2179 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149. Habeeb A.F.S.A. Hiramoto R.: ‘Reaction of proteins with glutaraldehyde’, Arch. Biochem. Biophys., 1968, 126, pp. 16 –26 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150. Cui Y.J. Li Y.F. Yang Y. et al.: ‘Facile synthesis of amino‐silane modified super paramagnetic Fe3 O4 nanoparticles and application for lipase immobilization’, J. Biotechnol., 2010, 150, pp. 171 –174 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151. Sulek F. Drofenik M. Hubulin M. et al.: ‘Surface functionalization of silica‐coated magnetic nanoparticles for covalent attachment of cholesterol oxidase’, J. Magn. Magn. Mater., 2010, 322, pp. 179 –185 [Google Scholar]
- 152. Singh R.S. Dhaliwal R. Puri M.: ‘Production of high fructose syrup from Asparagus inulin using immobilized exoinulinase from Kluyveromyces marxianus YS‐1’, J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 2007, 34, pp. 649 –655 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153. Philippova O. Barabanova A. Molchanov V. et al.: ‘Magnetic polymer beads: recent trends and developments in synthetic design and applications’, Eur. Polym. J., 2011, 47, pp. 542 –559 [Google Scholar]
- 154. Yong Y. Bai Y. Li Y. et al.: ‘Preparation and application of polymer‐grafted magnetic nanoparticles for lipase immobilization’, J. Magn. Magn. Mater., 2008, 320, pp. 2350 –2355 [Google Scholar]
- 155. Brahim S. Narinesingh D. Elie A.G.: ‘Kinetics of glucose oxidase immobilized in p(HEMA)‐hydrogel microspheres in a packed‐bed bioreactor’, J. Mol. Catal. B Enzym., 2002, 18, pp. 69 –80 [Google Scholar]
- 156. Liao H. Chen D. Yuan L. et al.: ‘Immobilized cellulase by polyvinyl alcohol/Fe2O3 magnetic nanoparticle to degrade microcrystalline cellulose’, Carbohyd. Polym., 2010, 82, pp. 600 –604 [Google Scholar]
- 157. Bosio V.E. Islan G.A. Martínez Y.N. et al.: ‘Nanodevices for the immobilization of therapeutic enzymes’, Crit. Rev. Biotechnol., 2015, 2, pp. 1 –18 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158. Meng X. Xu G. Zhou Q.L. et al.: ‘Highly efficient solvent‐free synthesis of 1,3‐diacylglycerols by lipase immobilised on nano‐sized magnetite particles’, Food Chem., 2014, 143, pp. 319 –324 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159. Swarnalatha V. Esther R.A. Dhamodharan R.: ‘Immobilization of α‐amylase on gum acacia stabilized magnetite nanoparticles, an easily recoverable and reusable support’, J. Mol. Catal. B Enzym., 2013, 96, pp. 6 –13 [Google Scholar]
- 160. Bahrami A. Hejazi P.: ‘Electrostatic immobilization of pectinase on negatively charged AOT‐Fe3O4 nanoparticles’, J. Mol. Catal. B Enzym., 2013, 93, pp. 1 –7 [Google Scholar]
- 161. Gupta K. Jana A.K. Kumar S. et al.: ‘Immobilization of amyloglucosidase from SSF of Aspergillus niger by crosslinked enzyme aggregate onto magnetic nanoparticles using minimum amount of carrier and characterizations’, J. Mol. Catal. B Enzym., 2013, 98, pp. 30 –36 [Google Scholar]
- 162. Ansari S.A. Husain Q.: ‘Immobilization of Kluyveromyceslactis? Galactosidase on concanavalin A layered aluminium oxide nanoparticles‐its future aspects in biosensor applications’, J. Mol. Catal. B Enzym., 2011, 70, pp. 119 –126 [Google Scholar]
- 163. Lee D.G. Ponvel K.M. Kim M. et al.: ‘Immobilization of lipase on hydrophobic nano‐sized magnetite particles’, J. Mol. Catal. B Enzym., 2009, 57, pp. 62 –66 [Google Scholar]
- 164. Ghasemi S. Heidary M. Faramarzi M.A. et al.: ‘Immobilization of lipase on Fe3 O4 /ZnO core/shell magnetic nanoparticles and catalysis of Michael‐type addition to chalcone derivatives’, J. Mol. Catal. B Enzym., 2014, 100, pp. 121 –128 [Google Scholar]
- 165. Sharma R. Chisti Y. Banerjee U.C.: ‘Production, purification, characterization, and applications of lipases’, Biotechnol. Adv., 2001, 19, pp. 627 –662 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166. Aravindhan R. Anbumathi P. Viruthagiri T.: ‘Lipase applications in food industry’, Indian J. Biotechnol., 2007, 6, pp. 141 –158 [Google Scholar]
- 167. Ziegler‐Borowska M. Chelminiak‐Dudkiewicz D. Siodmiak T. et al.: ‘Chitosan‐collagen coated magnetic nanoparticles for lipase immobilization – new type of ‘enzyme friendly’ polymer shell crosslinking with squaric acid’, Preprints, 2017, 7, p. 26 [Google Scholar]
- 168. Kumar V.V. Sivanesan S. Cabana H.: ‘Magnetic cross‐linked laccase aggregates‐ Bioremediation tool for decolorization of distinct classes of recalcitrant dyes’, Sci. Total Environ., 2014, 487, pp. 830 –839 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169. Balaji N. Kumar K.S. Seenuvasan M. et al.: ‘Efficacy of laccase to mineralize the aromatic amines released during the oxido‐reductive cleavage of sulphonated reactive azo dye’, Int. J. Appl. Eng. Res., 2014, 9, pp. 9116 –9118 [Google Scholar]
- 170. Kumar M.A. Vijayalakshmi A. Lincy E.A.R. et al.: ‘Biotransformation of reactive black HEBL into 3‐nitroso‐3‐azabicyclo (3.2.2) nonane by an acclimated mixed culture’, Int. J. ChemTech. Res., 2014, 6, pp. 4172 –4179 [Google Scholar]
- 171. Kumar M.A. Kumar V.V. Premkumar M.P. et al.: ‘Chemometric formulation of bacterial consortium‐AVS for improved decolorization of resonance‐stabilized and hetero‐polyaromatic dyes’, Bioresour. Technol., 2012, 123, pp. 344 –351 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172. Kunamneni A. Ghazi I. Camarero S. et al.: ‘Decolorization of synthetic dyes by laccase immobilized on epoxy‐activated carriers’, Process Biochem., 2008, 43, pp. 169 –178 [Google Scholar]
- 173. Merle G. Brunel L. Tingry S. et al.: ‘Electrode biomaterials based on immobilized laccase. Application for enzymatic reduction of dioxygen’, Mater. Sci. Eng. C, 2008, 28, pp. 932 –938 [Google Scholar]
- 174. Bayramoglu G. Yilmaz M. Arica M.Y.: ‘Reversible immobilization of laccase to poly (4‐vinylpyridine) grafted and Cu(II) chelated magnetic beads: biodegradation of reactive dyes’, Bioresour. Technol., 2010, 101, pp. 6615 –6621 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 175. Fernandes R.A. Daniel‐da‐Silva A.L. Tavares A.P.M. et al.: ‘EDTA‐Cu (II) chelating magnetic nanoparticles as a support for laccase immobilization’, Chem. Eng. Sci., 2017, 158, pp. 599 –605 [Google Scholar]
- 176. Ma X. Wang D. Yin M. et al.: ‘Characteristics of pectinase treated with ultrasound both during and after the immobilization process’, Ultrason. Sonochem., 2017, 36, pp. 1 –10 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 177. Rui Y.P. Liang B. Hu F. et al.: ‘Ultra‐large‐scale production of ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles for T1‐weighted MRI’, RSC Adv., 2016, 6, pp. 22575 –22585 [Google Scholar]
