Study | Reason for exclusion |
---|---|
Abalos 2009 | Recruited participants up to and including ICDAS 4 |
Abalos 2012 | Recruited participants up to and including ICDAS 4 |
Abou 2016 | Artifical caries |
Abrams 2017 | Thresholds used for histology do not allow for consistent classification of sound, enamel, and dentine caries used in other studies, interesting because it does use Canary system |
Amaechi 2013 | Used index test to inform "ground truth" so no valid reference standard |
Anttonen 2004 | Follow‐up to the 2003 study which is included, no validation complete in this study |
Askaroglou 2011 | Not a DTA study, investigates correlation effects of sealants on fluorescence results |
Betrisey 2014 | Clear that severe caries were included in the sample |
Blazejewska 2016 | To be included in transillumination review as index test is DIAGNOcam |
Diniz 2016 | Included cavitated margins |
Gomez 2013 | Recruited participants up to and including ICDAS 4 |
Heinrich‐Weltzien 2005 | Study does not attempt to compare index test to a reference standard, therefore not a DTA study |
Holtzman 2014 | Recruited participants up to and including ICDAS 4 |
Jablonski‐Momeni 2011a | Selected participants with "the full range of appearances from sound to gross cavitation" |
Jablonski‐Momeni 2013 | Recruitment strategy aims to recruit dentinal lesions |
Jallad 2015 | Included teeth with occlusal surfaces of ICDAS 4 |
Kordic 2003 | Table 1 confirms that dentinal caries were included in the sample |
Marinova‐Takorova 2014 | Not a DTA study, investigates correlation only |
Melo 2015 | Participants were scheduled for restoration, therefore dentine decay will have been intentionally included |
Menem 2017 | Methods state that 30 sites were recruited with cavitated lesions, authors confirmed these to be dentinal |
Mujat 2003 | Not a DTA study |
Mujat 2004 | Not a DTA study |
Nemes 2001 | No suitable reference standard |
Parviainen 2013 | Clear from published figures that sample included frank cavitation |
Patel 2014 | Included lesions up to and including ICDAS 4 |
Pereira 2009 | Same teeth and results as Pereira 2011, this paper does not report sensitivity and specificity results, instead it focusses on treatment decision |
Rechmann 2012 | Included lesions up to and including ICDAS 6 |
Subka 2019 | Sample included teeth due for extraction which are described as "advanced caries" |
Theocharopoulou 2015 | Included frank cavitation |
Zhang 2009 | Root caries |
DTA = diagnostic test accuracy; ICDAS = International Caries Detection and Assessment System.