Skip to main content
. 2022 May 1;42(3):314–320. doi: 10.3343/alm.2022.42.3.314

Table 1.

Data from a 2020 professional survey of the GC status in Korea conducted by the Genetic Counseling Committee of the Korean Society for Genetic Diagnostics

Variables Participants, N (%)
GC status (N = 54)
Providing GC 44 (81.5)
Not providing GC 10 (18.5)
Service type (N = 44)
Outpatient clinic 19 (43.2)
Consultation 18 (40.9)
Support online or by phone 33 (75.0)
Multidisciplinary team 9 (20.5)
GC cases per month (N = 44)
≤ 10 32 (72.7)
11–20 5 (11.4)
≥ 21 7 (15.9)
GC sessions per week (N = 44)
Irregular 26 (59.1)
1 4 (9.1)
2 3 (6.8)
≥3 11 (25.0)
Time spent on pre-GC activities (N = 44)
New patients
< 30 min 9 (20.5)
30–59 min 15 (34.1)
60–119 min 10 (22.7)
> 120 min 5 (11.4)
Not applicable 5 (11.4)
Follow-up patients
< 30 min 12 (27.3)
30–59 min 18 (40.9)
Not applicable 14 (31.8)
Time spent on GC (N = 44)
New patients
< 15 min 9 (20.5)
15–30 min 18 (40.9)
31–60 min 9 (20.5)
Not applicable 8 (18.2)
Follow-up patients
< 15 min 13 (29.5)
15–30 min 15 (34.1)
Not applicable 16 (36.4)
Scope of GC (N = 44)
Mendelian disorders 28 (63.6)
Cancer genetics 28 (63.6)
Family test 26 (59.1)
Genetic predisposition (genetic susceptibility) 19 (43.2)
Prenatal genetics 17 (38.6)
Other genetic disorders 12 (27.3)
GC practitioner qualification (N = 54)
Genetics and disease-related profession 35 (64.8)
Interpretation of genetic testing results 35 (64.8)
Psychological and emotional support provision 28 (51.9)
Disease management 22 (40.7)
Challenges and concerns regarding GC (N = 54)
Lack of financial support 30 (55.6)
Collaboration with other specialists for disease management 9 (16.7)
Effort load for acquiring latest medical scientific knowledge 3 (5.6)
Lack of consensus about standard GC 3 (5.6)
Lack of specialized training program 1 (1.9)

Abbreviation: GC, genetic counseling.