Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 17;100(50):e28165. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000028165

Table 3.

Modeling determinants of fibrosis progression.

Independent variable Univariable model Multivariable model Final model
OR (95% CI), P value OR (95% CI), P value OR (95% CI), P value
Age (continuous) 1.02 (1.00–1.03), P = .050 1.01 (0.99–1.03), P = .457 1.01 (0.99–1.03), P = .310
Sex, female vs male 0.54 (0.37–0.78), P = .001 0.60 (0.39–0.92), P = .019 0.59 (0.38–0.90), P = .016
Race/ethnicity, white vs other 0.66 (0.16–1.90), P = .500
Alcohol consumption, vs never
 Once per mo 1.57 (0.99–2.50), P = .056 1.23 (0.73–2.06), P = .441
 2 to 4 times per mo 2.43 (1.48–3.98), P < .001 1.54 (0.86–2.76), P = .142
 4 to 6 times per mo 3.14 (1.62–5.88), P < .001 1.49 (0.66–3.21), P = .317
 More than 6 times per mo 2.52 (0.55–8.46), P = .170 1.60 (0.29–6.65), P = .542
 Unknown 1.00 (0.29–2.65), P = .996 0.53 (0.13–1.68), P = .323
Smoking status, vs non-smoker
 Ex-smoker 1.31 (0.86–1.99), P = 2.00 1.20 (0.74–1.96), P = .456 1.28 (0.79–2.04), P = .311
 Current smoker 2.29 (1.38–3.76), P = .001 2.01 (1.09–3.66), P = .023 2.31 (1.30–4.03), P = .004
 Unknown 1.63 (0.71–3.38), P = .212 2.31 (0.89–5.52), P = .069 1.92 (0.77–4.40), P = .138
Employment, vs full-time
 Part-time 2.03 (1.22–3.34), P = .005 1.80 (1.02–3.13), P = .039 1.75 (1.00–3.01), P = .046
 Self-employed 1.45 (0.71–2.79), P = .283 0.91 (0.40–1.94), P = .821 0.92 (0.41–1.93), P = .830
 Student 1.79 (0.41–5.64), P = .368 1.93 (0.39–7.08), P = .360 1.83 (0.38–6.59), P = .397
 Retired 3.05 (1.72–5.31), P < .001 2.22 (1.07–4.51), P = .030 2.06 (1.01–4.14), P = .045
 Unemployed 2.47 (1.28–4.55), P = .005 2.32 (1.12–4.66), P = .020 2.08 (1.02–4.11), P = .039
 Homemaker 2.12 (0.87–4.64), P = .074 1.96 (0.73–4.79), P = .157 2.07 (0.78–5.00), P = .120
 Physically unable to work due to NASH or related complications 9.56 (1.73–52.97), P = .007 28.76 (3.37–273.34), P = .002 26.63 (3.44–238.94), P = .002
 Physically unable to work due to other reason(s) 1.19 (0.06–6.72), P = .868 0.71 (0.03–6.52), P = .799 0.54 (0.02–4.46), P = .629
Years since diagnosis (continuous) 1.18 (1.13–1.24), P < .001 1.15 (1.09–1.21), P < .001 1.17 (1.11–1.23), P < .001
Liver biopsy, yes vs no 1.30 (0.91–1.90), P = .159 1.52 (1.00–2.33), P = .053 1.49 (0.98–2.28), P = .062
Fibrosis stage at diagnosis, vs F0
 F1 1.26 (0.78–2.07), P = .356 0.99 (0.58–1.71), P = .962 1.00 (0.58–1.72), P = .987
 F2 1.22 (0.73–2.05), P = .454 0.85 (0.47–1.54), P = .592 0.87 (0.49–1.57), P = .647
 F3 0.71 (0.36–1.35), P = .304 0.39 (0.17–0.82), P = .016 0.38 (0.17–0.80), P = .014
 F4CC 0.09 (0.01–0.31), P = .001 0.06 (0.01–0.23), P = .001 0.06 (0.01–0.23), P < .001
Comorbidities
 Obesity from calculated BMI, yes vs no 1.07 (0.75–1.55), P = .700
 Obesity from physician notes, yes vs no 2.22 (1.55–3.20), P < .001 1.78 (1.15–2.76), P = .010 1.89 (1.26–2.86), P = .002
 Type 2 diabetes mellitus, yes vs no 1.26 (0.84–1.86), P = .262
 Cardiovascular disease, yes vs no 2.26 (0.93–4.98), P = .055
 Hypertension, yes vs no 1.58 (1.08–2.28), P = .016 0.99 (0.60–1.62), P = .973
 Dyslipidemia, yes vs no 1.51 (1.04–2.18), P = .027 0.95 (0.57–1.58), P = .853
Non-pharmacological NASH treatment proposed at diagnosis
 Lifestyle change, yes vs no 1.49 (1.04–2.15), P = .031 1.12 (0.71–1.76), P = .619
 Behavioral strategies, yes vs no 0.64 (0.15–1.83), P = .461
 Bariatric or intragastric surgery, yes vs no 1.51 (0.82–2.64), P = .159
 Liver transplantation, yes vs no 3.33 (1.46–7.17), P = .003 3.96 (1.35–11.40), P = .011 4.95 (1.77–13.55), P = .002
Pharmacological NASH treatment
 Lipid-lowering drugs, yes vs no 1.42 (0.89–2.21), P = .133
 Vitamin E, yes vs no 0.52 (0.27–0.94), P = .040 0.52 (0.25–1.01), P = .063 0.54 (0.27–1.02), P = .070
 Metformin, yes vs no 1.25 (0.73–2.06), P = .400
 Thiazolidinediones, yes vs no 3.95 (1.94–7.79), P < .001 2.03 (0.78–5.06), P = .135
 Other anti-diabetic medication(s), yes vs no 1.00 (0.23–3.01), P = .998
 Other medication(s), yes vs no 1.68 (0.91–2.94), P = .081

BMI = body mass index, CC = compensated cirrhosis, CI = confidence interval, NASH = nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, OR = odds ratio.

Only 6 patients reported inability to work due to NASH; this odds ratio should be interpreted with caution.

Pharmacological treatment prescribed at diagnosis and receiving it at date of last consultation.

Weight loss in the past 12 months, expressed as a percentage, was not significant in the univariable model (All P > .05).