Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2021 Sep 20;111(1):243–251. doi: 10.1002/cpt.2400

Table 2.

Treatment effect heterogeneity by EHR-continuity

Hospital Empirical example EHR-continuity HREHR+claims (95% CI) Ratio of HREHR+claims (95% CI) * p for interaction**
System 1 A-STO Top 25% 2.14 (1.25,3.65) Ref ref
Top 25–50% 1.64 (1.00,2.70) 0.76 (0.37,1.56) 0.4612
Top 50–75% 2.41 (1.32,4.38) 1.23 (0.55,2.74) 0.6213
Lower 25% 1.60 (0.75,3.42) 0.68 (0.28,1.69) 0.4094
A-LTO Top 25% 1.34 (0.86,2.11) Ref ref
Top 25–50% 1.25 (0.77,2.04) 0.97 (0.50,1.88) 0.9319
Top 50–75% 1.65 (0.97,2.79) 1.07 (0.55,2.10) 0.8418
Lower 25% 1.07 (0.52,2.19) 0.88 (0.37,2.10) 0.7785
GN-LTO Top 25% 1.63 (1.46,1.82) Ref ref
Top 25–50% 1.65 (1.49,1.82) 0.96 (0.83,1.11) 0.5911
Top 50–75% 1.63 (1.45,1.85) 0.99 (0.85,1.15) 0.8778
Lower 25% 1.63 (1.44,1.85) 0.97 (0.83,1.14) 0.7162
GG-LTO Top 25% 1.02 (0.92,1.14) Ref ref
Top 25–50% 1.10 (0.98,1.25) 1.10 (0.94,1.29) 0.2577
Top 50–75% 0.86 (0.76,0.97) 0.83 (0.71,0.98) 0.027
Lower 25% 1.09 (0.93,1.28) 1.09 (0.90,1.32) 0.3901
System 2 A-STO Top 25% 3.74 (1.47,9.49) Ref ref
Top 25–50% 1.94 (0.96,3.94) 0.60 (0.20,1.81) 0.3685
Top 50–75% 1.91 (1.08,3.40) 0.66 (0.24,1.81) 0.4231
Lower 25% 2.93 (1.44,5.95) 0.91 (0.31,2.70) 0.8687
A-LTO Top 25% 2.31 (1.05,5.11) Ref ref
Top 25–50% 1.82 (0.94,3.52) 0.80 (0.28,2.24) 0.6663
Top 50–75% 1.46 (0.89,2.38) 0.61 (0.24,1.55) 0.302
Lower 25% 1.82 (1.07,3.07) 0.73 (0.28,1.87) 0.5102
GN-LTO Top 25% 1.42 (1.20,1.68) Ref ref
Top 25–50% 1.35 (1.20,1.53) 0.93 (0.76,1.13) 0.4671
Top 50–75% 1.47 (1.30,1.66) 0.94 (0.77,1.14) 0.5187
Lower 25% 1.44 (1.27,1.62) 0.93 (0.76,1.14) 0.4888
GG-LTO Top 25% 1.12 (0.94,1.32) Ref ref
Top 25–50% 0.90 (0.79,1.03) 0.81 (0.66,0.99) 0.0393
Top 50–75% 0.91 (0.81,1.02) 0.83 (0.68,1.01) 0.0631
Lower 25% 1.04 (0.88,1.22) 0.94 (0.75,1.18) 0.5792

EHR= electronic health records, HREHR+claims = adjusted hazard ratio based on the linked EHR-claims data, CI= confidence interval, Ref= referent group

*

Ratios of adjusted HREHR+claims compared between top 25% vs. top 25–50%, 50–75%, and lower 25%of predicted EHR-continuity

**

P testing for interaction between adjusted HREHR+claims in top 25% vs. top 25–50%, 50–75%, and lower 25%of predicted EHR-continuity

A-STO: comparing the effect of two Antibiotics on a short-term outcome

A-LTO: comparing the effect of two Antibiotics effect on a long-term outcome

GN-LTO: Comparing the effect of a Gastroprotective agent vs. non-use on a long-term outcome

GG-LTO: Comparing the effect of two Gastroprotective agents on a long-term outcome