De Deyn 2005.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods |
Study design: randomised controlled trial Study grouping: parallel group Study duration: 10 weeks Rescue medication: allowed for NPS, not for EPS |
|
Participants |
Number randomised: 208 (106 aripiprazole 102 placebo) Mean age: 81.5 years Sex (female): 72% Type of dementia: Alzheimer's disease Severity of dementia: moderate Indication: Psychosis (Baseline Psychosis NPI Psychosis: 12.4) Setting: assisted living facilities, adult communities or living with a caregiver Country: USA |
|
Interventions |
Intervention characteristics Aripiprazole
Placebo Eligible patients were randomised to aripiprazole 2 mg/d or placebo, administered once daily for 10 weeks, in this multicentre, double‐blind study. Aripiprazole could be titrated to higher doses (5, 10 mg, and 15 mg/day) at 2‐week intervals (or more rapidly based on investigator’s judgement) if the patient showed insufficient clinical response. At end point, the mean daily dose of aripiprazole was 10.0 mg. |
|
Outcomes | Psychosis: Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) Psychosis subscale Extrapyramidal symptoms Somnolence Death Any serious adverse event Discontinuation (any reason) Discontinuation due to adverse events Cognitive function: Mini‐Mental State Examination (MMSE) |
|
Identification | ||
Notes | Sponsorship source: Bristol‐Myers Squibb and Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No comments |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No comments |
Comparability of groups (selection bias) | High risk | Judgement Comment: No baseline information in main article. A clinical study report provides data on age, sex, race and weight only: small differences that might or might not be in favour of the drug. They are not adjusted for. Baseline scores for outcomes are given for analysed (not all randomised) patients only, but are adjusted for. |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | No comments |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | No comments |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Judgement Comment: Drop‐out was just below 20% and did not differ >5% between groups.It seems that not all patients were included in the analyses (see table with results on outcomes). Missing data were imputed with LOCF. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | High risk | Insufficient information about outcomes in the protocol. Lots of secondary outcomes. |
Other bias | High risk | "Following screening and a minimum 7‐day washout period for previous psychotropic medication (...)" |