Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 17;2021(12):CD013304. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013304.pub2

De Deyn 2005.

Study characteristics
Methods Study design: randomised controlled trial
Study grouping: parallel group
Study duration: 10 weeks
Rescue medication: allowed for NPS, not for EPS
Participants Number randomised: 208 (106 aripiprazole 102 placebo)
Mean age: 81.5 years
Sex (female): 72%
Type of dementia: Alzheimer's disease
Severity of dementia: moderate
Indication: Psychosis (Baseline Psychosis NPI Psychosis: 12.4)
Setting: assisted living facilities, adult communities or living with a caregiver
Country: USA
Interventions Intervention characteristics
Aripiprazole
  • dosage: flexible, 2 mg to 15 mg per day


Placebo
Eligible patients were randomised to aripiprazole 2 mg/d or placebo, administered once daily for 10 weeks, in this multicentre, double‐blind study. Aripiprazole could be titrated to higher doses (5, 10 mg, and 15 mg/day) at 2‐week intervals (or more rapidly based on investigator’s judgement) if the patient showed insufficient clinical response. At end point, the mean daily dose of aripiprazole was 10.0 mg.
Outcomes Psychosis: Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) Psychosis subscale
Extrapyramidal symptoms
Somnolence
Death
Any serious adverse event
Discontinuation (any reason)
Discontinuation due to adverse events
Cognitive function: Mini‐Mental State Examination (MMSE)
Identification  
Notes Sponsorship source: Bristol‐Myers Squibb and Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk No comments
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk No comments
Comparability of groups (selection bias) High risk Judgement Comment: No baseline information in main article. A clinical study report provides data on age, sex, race and weight only: small differences that might or might not be in favour of the drug. They are not adjusted for. Baseline scores for outcomes are given for analysed (not all randomised) patients only, but are adjusted for.
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk No comments
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk No comments
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk Judgement Comment: Drop‐out was just below 20% and did not differ >5% between groups.It seems that not all patients were included in the analyses (see table with results on outcomes). Missing data were imputed with LOCF.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) High risk Insufficient information about outcomes in the protocol. Lots of secondary outcomes.
Other bias High risk "Following screening and a minimum 7‐day washout period for previous psychotropic medication (...)"