Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 17;2021(12):CD013304. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013304.pub2

Streim 2008.

Study characteristics
Methods Study design: randomised controlled trial
Study grouping: parallel group
Study duration: 10 weeks
Rescue medication: allowed for NPS and EPS.
Participants Number randomised: 256 (131 aripiprazole125 placebo)
Mean age: 83.0 years
Sex (female): 76%
Type of dementia: Alzheimer's disease
Severity of dementia: moderate
Indication: psychosis (Psychosis NPI‐NH: 10.6)
Setting: institutionalised persons (i.e. residing in a nursing home or residential assisted‐living facility)
Country: USA
Interventions Intervention characteristics
Aripiprazole
  • dosage: flexible, 2 mg to 15 mg/ day


Placebo
Aripiprazole dosing was flexible, starting at 2 mg/day, with titration to higher doses (5 mg, 10 mg, and 15 mg/day) depending on the study physicians’ clinical judgment. The recommended titration schedule was 2 mg/day for 1 week, increasing to 5 mg/day for 2 weeks, 10 mg/day for the next 2 weeks, and 15 mg/day for the remainder of the acute phase (Weeks 6 –10). The mean daily aripiprazole dose at Week 10 was 9.0 mg (range: 0.7 mg to 15.0 mg).
Outcomes Psychosis: Neuropsychiatric Inventory–Nursing Home version (NPI‐NH) psychosis score
Number of responders for psychosis
Extrapyramidal symptoms
Somnolence
Death
Any adverse event
Any serious adverse event
Discontinuation (any reason)
Discontinuation due to adverse events
Cognitive function: Mini‐Mental State Examination (MMSE)
Functioning in activities of daily living: Alzheimer’s Disease Cooperative Study – Activities of Daily Living for Severe impairment (ADCS‐ADL‐SEV)
Identification  
Notes Sponsorship source: Bristol‐Myers Squibb Company, Wallingford, CT (CDB, Marcus); Bristol‐Myers Squibb Company, Braine l’Alleud, Belgium (RS); Otsuka America Pharmaceutical Inc., Princeton, NJ (McQuade, WHC)
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk No information
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk No information
Comparability of groups (selection bias) Unclear risk Limited set of relevant baseline characteristics shown. Small differences in set shown. Outcome score at baseline is not given for all randomized, but adjusted for in the analyses.
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk No information
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk No information
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes High risk Drop‐out was high (41%). Modified ITT was used excluding patients that did not receive one dose of study medication or an assessment after baseline (within 7 days after taking medication). Missing data was imputed with LOCF.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Insufficient information. Study protocol is available but no outcomes prespecified. Two coprimary outcomes. Multiple scales for NPS. Many additional analyses including OC comparisons. Unusual cut‐offs f.i. only weight increase of 7% or more included. Correction for multiple testing.
Other bias High risk Following screening and a minimum 7‐day psychotropic medication washout period (...)