TABLE 3.
Performance metrics for the RF classifier on the test set in various categories. Imbalance correction was applied to the NG+CR vs. LVH classification using Random Over Sampler
Features | Categories | Threshold | Accuracy (%) | Specificity (%) | Sensitivity (%) | AUC/ROC | AUC/PR |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
6 clinical | NG vs. CR + LVH | 0.5 | 79 | 73 | 84 | 0.85 | 0.82 |
6 clinical + 26 ECG | NG vs. CR + LVH | 0.5 | 87 | 75 | 97 | 0.91 | 0.89 |
6 clinical + 26 ECG + oversampling | NG + CR vs. LVH | 0.5 | 88 | 97 | 44 | 0.87 | 0.67 |
6 clinical + 26 ECG + oversampling | NG + CR vs. LVH | 0.4 | 89 | 93 | 67 | 0.89 | 0.5 |
Abbreviations: AUC/PR, area under the precision‐recall curve; AUC/ROC, area under the receiver operating curve; CR, concentric remodeling; ECG, electrocardiogram; LVH, left ventricular hypertrophy; NG, normal geometry.