Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 18;33(4):mzab142. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzab142

Table 4.

Type and potential severity of medication administration errors (MAEs) before and after implementation of central automated unit dose dispensing and barcode-assisted medication administration

Pre-intervention Post-intervention
Included medication administrations, n 1490 1630
MAEs, n 316 272
Type of MAE, n (% of administrations)
Wrong administration technique 78 99
Too fast administration 51 (3.4) 83 (5.1)
Incompatibility of parenteral medication 21 (1.4) 3 (0.2)
Other 6 (0.4) 13 (0.8)
Wrong medication handling 57 (3.8) 59 (3.6)
Omission 68 (4.6) 33 (2.0)
Wrong dose 57 (3.8) 35 (2.1)
Unordered drug 25 (1.7) 26 (1.6)
Wrong dosage form 25 (1.7) 20 (1.2)
Wrong route of administration 5 (0.3) 0
Expired medication 0 0
Other 1 (0.1) 0
Potential severity of MAEsa, n (% of administrations)
Error, no harm
C 173 (11.6) 209 (12.8)
D 99 (6.6) 58 (3.6)
Error, harm
E 35 (2.3) 5 (0.3)
F 7 (0.5) 0
H 2 (0.1) 0
a

NCC MERP classification [24]: no error (category A); error, no harm (category B to D); error, harm (category E to H); and error, death (category I). C: an error occurred that reached the patient but did not cause patient harm; D: an error occurred that reached the patient and required monitoring to confirm that it resulted in no harm to the patient and/or required intervention to preclude harm; E: an error occurred that may have contributed to or resulted in temporary harm to the patient and required intervention; F: an error occurred that may have contributed to or resulted in temporary harm to the patient and required initial or prolonged hospitalization; H: an error occurred that required intervention necessary to sustain life.