Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 17;61(8):1231–1240. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnaa178

Table 4.

Multilevel Models for Moderation Effects of Stress Appraisals on the Associations Between Respite Time and Daily Affect

Positive affect Negative affect
Main effects Moderation effects Main effects Moderation effects
Variable B    (SE) B   (SE) B            (SE) B                 (SE)
Moderated by role overload
 Objective respitea 0.03*** (0.01) 0.00    (0.02) 0.00    (0.00) 0.00 (0.01)
  × Role overloadb 0.01    (0.01) 0.00 (0.00)
 Subjective respitec 0.12            (0.07) 0.07    (0.32) −0.08* (0.03) 0.10 (0.15)
  × Role overloadb 0.02    (0.11) −0.06 (0.05)
 Role overloadb −0.09            (0.10) −0.14    (0.34) 0.01    (0.05) 0.20 (0.16)
−2 log likelihood 2,330.5 2,338.9 863.5 875.0
Moderated by work conflict
 Objective respitea 0.03**   (0.01) 0.07    (0.02) 0.00    (0.00) 0.00 (0.01)
  × Work conflictd 0.03* (0.01) 0.00 (0.01)
 Subjective respitec 0.03            (0.12) 0.18    (0.39) −0.01    (0.04) −0.09 (0.14)
  × Work conflictd −0.08    (0.20) 0.04 (0.07)
 Work conflictd −0.18                (0.20) 0.06    (0.65) 0.04    (0.07) −0.09 (0.23)
−2 log likelihood 917.2 920.7 222.8 234.1

Notes: Caregiver N = 173; caregiver-day N = 1,359 for role overload moderation. Employed caregiver n = 72; caregiver-day n = 563 for work conflict moderation. Models are fully adjusted for the same within-person and between-person covariates as the previous models.

aDaily actual time away (hours); person-mean centered (i.e., time-varying). bMean scores of three items (1 = none of the time to 4 = all of the time). cPerceived breaks from caregiving; 1 = never to 4 = often (i.e., time-invariant). dMean scores of nine items (1 = none of the time to 4 = all of the time); asked only for employed caregivers.

*p < .05. **p < .01. ***p < .001.