Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 15;11(12):e050804. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050804

Table 5.

Patient satisfaction with the intervention received (only those who made use of each intervention component)

n Mean (95% CI)
Conventional group educational programme
Usability
Environment generated 592 9.53 (9.46 to 9.60)
Exchange of experiences with participants and educator 588 9.59 (9.53 to 9.66)
Educator’s work 587 9.79 (9.74 to 9.83)
Quality of materials 587 9.56 (9.49 to 9.64)
Personal satisfaction
The sessions helped me get to know my diabetes better 591 9.67 (9.61 to 9.73)
I found the sessions useful 593 9.60 (9.52 to 9.67)
The sessions motivated me to look after my health better 590 9.62 (9.55 to 9.69)
General
General satisfaction 589 9.70 (9.65 to 9.76)
I would recommend the sessions 588 9.77 (9.72 to 9.82)
Website platform
Usability
Access to the content 253 8.30 (8.02 to 8.58)
Usability of the web 251 8.59 (8.33 to 8.85)
Patient outcomes follow-up charts 215 8.37 (8.03 to 8.72)
Quality of materials 229 8.81 (8.53 to 9.08)
Access to videos of the sessions 216 8.76 (8.47 to 9.05)
General
General satisfaction 237 8.56 (8.30 to 8.82)
I would recommend using the website 239 8.81 (8.56 to 9.05)
Semi-automated mobile phone messages
Usability
Reading SMS 585 9.51 (9.41 to 9.61)
Usefulness of reminders 576 9.33 (9.22 to 9.45)
Personal satisfaction
They adapt to my needs 579 9.04 (8.90 to 9.18)
They motivate me to look after myself 576 9.15 (9.02 to 9.28)
I would like to continue receiving them 552 8.80 (8.59 to 9.00)
General
General satisfaction 572 9.23 (9.09 to 9.37)