Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 14;9:e12416. doi: 10.7717/peerj.12416

Table 2. Variations in phenotypic characteristics for three F2 populations.

Trait name1 Mean2 StdError3 Skewness4 Kurtosis5 Minimum6 Maximum7 W-test8
Y32 FT 66.00 6.97 −0.19 0.36 44.00 82.00 0.97
PH 111.64 24.50 −0.68 1.42 32.00 170.00 0.95
BR 6.13 2.03 0.21 −0.3 2.00 11.00 0.96
Node 23.28 15.91 8.94 84.69 9.00 24.00 0.31
Pod 146.09 64.36 0.70 1.47 13.00 373.00 0.96
Y133 FT 66.74 10.63 −0.62 −0.31 43.00 88.00 0.91
PH 99.90 25.91 −0.32 −0.25 34.00 160.00 0.97
BR 4.51 1.94 0.47 0.07 0.00 10.00 0.95
Node 19.20 3.91 −0.47 −0.41 8.00 26.00 0.95
Pod 119.97 49.60 0.92 2.31 16.00 315.00 0.95
Y159 FT 64.78 6.49 −0.23 −0.06 50.00 81.00 0.97
PH 89.89 7.09 −0.19 0.03 68.00 106.00 0.99
BR 4.14 1.94 0.31 −0.32 0.00 9.00 0.95
Node 21.10 2.89 −1.31 2.69 9.00 26.00 0.90
Pod 121.45 47.83 0.67 0.89 33.00 306.00 0.97

Notes:

1

Flowering time (FT)(unit: days), Plant height (PH)(unit: centimeters), Branch number (BR), Node numbers of main stem (Nodes), Pods per plant (Pods).

2

Mean of the phenotypic trait.

3

Standard deviation of the phenotypic trait.

4

Skewness of the phenotypic trait.

5

Kurtosis of the phenotypic trait.

6

Minimum value of the phenotypic trait.

7

Maximum value of the phenotypic trait.

8

The Shapiro Wilk W-statistic for the test of normality.