Table 3. Effect of Design on magnitude of CPM effect, adjusted for order effect.
Absolute data | Relative data (%) | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Design | Order | Design | Order | ||||||||||
Location | β, 95% CI | P-Value | f2 | β, 95% CI | P-value | β, 95% CI | P-Value | f2 | β, 95% CI | P-Value | |||
Mechanical | Cervical spine | −3 [−21, 15] | .723 | 0.00 | 24 [6, 43] | .009 | −6.1 [−10.1, −2.1] | .003 | 0.10 | 0.1 [−3.9, 4.1] | .967 | ||
Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT)a | Forearm | 5 [−16, 26] | .633 | 0.00 | 23 [2, 44] | .034 | −4.5 [−9.0, 0.1] | .055 | 0.04 | −0.7 [−5.3, 3.8] | .745 | ||
Lower leg | −5 [−40, 30] | .780 | 0.00 | 46 [11, 81] | .010 | −5.9 [−11.7, −0.1] | .046 | 0.05 | −0.3 [−5.4, 6.1] | .907 | |||
Thermal | Cervical spine | −1 [−5, 2] | .501 | 0.01 | 3 [−1, 6] | .120 | −5.1 [−13.4, 3.1] | .214 | 0.03 | 6.3 [−1.9, 14.5] | .129 | ||
Heat Test Stimulus (HTS)b | Forearm | −1 [ −4, 1] | .324 | 0.01 | 3 [0, 6] | .060 | −1.7 [−9.8, 6.3] | .670 | 0.00 | 5.8 [−2.2, 13.9] | .156 | ||
Lower leg | 1 [−2, 3] | .579 | 0.01 | 5 [2, 7] | <.001 | −1.9 [−8.6, 4.9] | .586 | 0.00 | 9.2 [2.4, 15.9] | .009 |
Notes.
Significant effects are printed in bold. Test location at the cervical spine is paraspinal muscles over C5/C6, at the forearm is extensor carpi radialis muscle and at the lower leg is the tibialis anterior muscle. A negative coefficient for design indicates the sequential design is lower compared to the parallel design. Order effect is based upon if the design was either first or second. A negative coefficient for order indicates that the first measurement is lower than the second measurement.
Absolute data in kPa.
Absolute data in VAS (0–100).