Table 3.
CFIR Constructs and their Related Barriers or Motivators for the Engagement of Private Hospitals in TB Care
CFIR Domain | CFIR construct | Barrier or motivator | Explanation for motivators and barriers |
---|---|---|---|
| |||
Intervention Characteristics | Relative advantage | Motivator | Private hospitals were perceived to have a relative advantage of providing high-quality healthcare services and for enabling privacy and confidentiality for patients |
Cost | Barrier | Healthcare providers perceived high costs in terms of payment for care by patients. In addition, they also noted that TB care is an indirect income generating service which makes it unattractive to venture in since most private hospitals are for-profit | |
Outer setting | Patients’ needs and resources | Motivator | Private hospitals are nearer to patients thus saving them from costs involved in traveling to public health centers that are far |
External policy and incentives | Barrier | Lack of drugs, registers, and diagnostic tools and lack of accreditation from the Ugandan Ministry of Health hinder the engagement | |
Inner setting | Structure characteristics | Barrier | Limited space for keeping TB patients |
Networks and communications | Barrier | Lack of proper follow-up mechanism for the referred patients | |
Characteristics of individuals | Knowledge and beliefs about the intervention | Barrier | Lack of training and qualified human resources to manage TB disease and delayed seeking of health care by the patients |
The process of implementation | Engaging | Motivator | Formalization of partnerships between private hospitals and the government |