Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Glob Implement Res Appl. 2021 Nov 8;1(4):279–290. doi: 10.1007/s43477-021-00030-3

Table 3.

CFIR Constructs and their Related Barriers or Motivators for the Engagement of Private Hospitals in TB Care

CFIR Domain CFIR construct Barrier or motivator Explanation for motivators and barriers

Intervention Characteristics Relative advantage Motivator Private hospitals were perceived to have a relative advantage of providing high-quality healthcare services and for enabling privacy and confidentiality for patients
Cost Barrier Healthcare providers perceived high costs in terms of payment for care by patients. In addition, they also noted that TB care is an indirect income generating service which makes it unattractive to venture in since most private hospitals are for-profit
Outer setting Patients’ needs and resources Motivator Private hospitals are nearer to patients thus saving them from costs involved in traveling to public health centers that are far
External policy and incentives Barrier Lack of drugs, registers, and diagnostic tools and lack of accreditation from the Ugandan Ministry of Health hinder the engagement
Inner setting Structure characteristics Barrier Limited space for keeping TB patients
Networks and communications Barrier Lack of proper follow-up mechanism for the referred patients
Characteristics of individuals Knowledge and beliefs about the intervention Barrier Lack of training and qualified human resources to manage TB disease and delayed seeking of health care by the patients
The process of implementation Engaging Motivator Formalization of partnerships between private hospitals and the government