Table 3.
Structural validity | Internal consistency | Cross-cultural validity/ measurement invariance | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Patient-reported outcome measures | Content validity # domains |
Methods | Results | LoE | Methods | Results | LoE | Methods | Results | LoE |
BIS | 6 | NA | ? | NA | Very good | + | Low | NA | ? | NA |
Pittsburgh SQI | 8 | NA | ? | NA | Very good | - | Low | NA | ? | NA |
GSDS | 6 | NA | ? | NA | Very good | + | Low | NA | ? | NA |
PSQS | 5 | Adequate | + | Low | Very good | + | Low | NA | ? | NA |
ISI | 5 | NA | ? | NA | NA | ? | NA | NA | ? | NA |
ESS | 1 | NA | ? | NA | Very good | + | Low | NA | ? | NA |
Athens IS | 6 | NA | ? | NA | NA | ? | NA | NA | ? | NA |
Sleep SC | 9 | NA | ? | NA | NA | ? | NA | NA | ? | NA |
Reliability | Measurement Error | Hypothesis testing | Responsiveness | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Patient-reported outcome measures | Methods | Results | LoE | Methods | Results | LoE | Methods | Results | LoE | Methods | Results | LoE | Recommendation |
BIS | NA | ? | NA | NA | ? | NA | Very good | + | Low | Very good | - | Very low | A |
Pittsburgh SQI | NA | ? | NA | NA | ? | NA | Very good | + | Low | NA | ? | NA | B |
GSDS | NA | ? | NA | NA | ? | NA | Very good | + | Low | NA | ? | NA | A |
PSQS | Very good | +/- | Low | NA | ? | NA | Very good | + | Low | NA | ? | NA | C |
ISI | NA | ? | NA | NA | ? | NA | Very good | + | Low | NA | ? | NA | C |
ESS | NA | ? | NA | NA | ? | NA | Very good | + | Low | NA | ? | NA | C |
Athens IS | NA | ? | NA | NA | ? | NA | Very good | + | Very low | NA | ? | NA | B |
Sleep SC | NA | ? | NA | NA | ? | NA | Very good | + | Low | NA | ? | NA | B |
BIS = Bergen insomnia scale; Pittsburgh SQI = Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index; GSDS = General Sleep Disturbance Scale; PSQS = Postpartum Sleep Quality Scale; ISI = Insomnia Severity Index; ESS = Epworth Sleepiness Scale; Athens IS = Athens Insomnia Scale; SSC = Sleep Symptom Checklist.
Methodology reported as either: “Very good,” “Adequate,” “Doubtful,” “Inadequate” or “Not assessed” (NA).
Ratings for overall performance reported as either: sufficient (+), insufficient (–), inconsistent (±), or indeterminate (?); LoE = level of evidence using GRADE reported as: “High,” “Moderate,” “Low,” “Very low” or “Not assessed” (NA).
Recommendation: (A) evidence for sufficient content validity (≥6 domains assessed) and at least low-quality evidence for sufficient internal consistency (measures can be recommended for use); (B) measures categorized not in A or C (require further evaluation to assess quality prior to recommendation for use); (C) high quality evidence for an insufficient rated measurement property (not recommended for use).