Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 6;49(22):13179–13193. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab1170

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Formation and stability of modified GCPAN triplex. (A) Secondary structures of the unimolecular GCPAN triplex (left) and bimolecular GCENE•ggc(A)9 triplex (right). (B) Susceptibility of the unimolecular GCPAN triplex to 3′–5′ exoribonuclease R (RNaseR) digestion evaluated by denaturing PAGE. (C) CD spectra for ggc(A)9 (black), GCENE (red) and GCENE+ggc(A)9 mixture (blue). Distinct spectra for each sample indicate triple association in the GCENE + ggc(A)9 mixture. (D) SEC analysis indicates enhanced stability of the GCPAN triplex. The main SEC fraction was analyzed by denaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, indicating the presence of ggc(A)9 and GCENE duplex. Bands corresponding to GCENE duplex in the control sample (left lane) and main SEC fraction (right lane) are oversaturated, resulting in a shadow effect and an appearance as a light orange band. (E) MST binding plot for GCENE titrated into 5′-Cy5 labeled ggc(A)9 indicates high affinity binding of the two RNA strands. (F) EMSA analysis of binding of GCENE duplex titrated into 32P-radiolabeled ggc(A)9 also indicates high binding affinity for these two RNA strands.