Table 3.
Phase 2 trials | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Author (Trial name) | Design | Stage | Setting | Drug | Key Findings | Ref |
Kaufman | Non-randomized phase 2 | Advanced or metastatic |
|
Olaparib | ORR: 21.7% DOR: 134 days OS: 18.4 mos PFS: 4.6 mos |
44 |
Shroff (RUCAPANC) | Non-randomized phase 2 | Locally advanced or metastatic |
|
Rucaparib | ORR: 15.8% DCR: 31.6% |
45 |
Lowery | Non-randomized phase 2 | Locally advanced or Metastatic |
|
Veliparib | ORR: 0% mPFS: 1.7 mo mOS: 3.1 mo |
47 |
O’Reilly | Randomized phase 2 | Locally advanced or metastatic |
|
Gem/Cis +/− Veliparib | (veliparib vs without) ORR: 74.1% vs 65.2% (p=0.55) DCR: 100% vs 78.3% (p=0.02) mOS: 15.5 mos vs 16.4 mos (p=0.6) mPFS: 10.1 mos vs 9.7 mos (p=0.73) G3–4 heme toxicities: 48% vs 30% |
10 |
Javle | Two parallel non-randomized phase 2 | Metastatic |
|
Olaparib | ORR: mOS: 9.9 mos mPFS: 3.7 mos |
48 |
Reiss | Non-randomized phase 2 | Unresectable or metastatic | Maintenance
|
Rucaparib | mPFS: 13.1 mos mOS: 23.5 mos DCR: 66.7% DOR: 17.3 mos ORR: 41.7% |
46 |
Phase 3 trials | ||||||
Author (Trial Name) | Design | Stage | Setting | Drug | Outcomes | Ref |
Golan (POLO) | Randomized phase 3 | Metastatic |
|
Olaparib vs placebo | mPFS 7.4 mo vs 3.8 mo (HR 0.43 95%CI 0.35–0.82, p=0.004) mOS 18.9mo vs 18.1 mo (HR 0.91 95% CI 0.56–1.46, p=0.68) HRQOL between group difference −2.47 (95%CI −7.27 to 2.33) on 100-point scale |
24,49,50 |
mPFS = median progression-free survival, OS= median overall survival, HRQOL= health-related quality of life 95%CI = 95% Confidence Interval, ORR = objective response rate, DCR = disease control rate, G3–4 Heme toxicities = rates of grade 3 to grade 4 hematologic toxicity, gem= gemcitabine, cis= cisplatin. POLO HRQOL was assessed with the EORTC QLQ-C30 global health-related quality-of-life score. Javle study accepted DNA damage repair deficiencies: somatic BRCA variant, somatic or germline: ATM, PALB2, CHEK1, FANCA, BARD1, RAD50, and ARID1A.